Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 569, 2024
GeoAmericas 2024 - 5th Pan-American Conference on Geosynthetics
Article Number 15003
Number of page(s) 18
Section Landfills 2
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456915003
Published online 15 November 2024
  1. R. Thiel and J.P. Giroud, Localized shear strength mobilization at geosynthetic interfaces caused by spreading soil upslope, Presented at GeoAfrica23, 4th African Regional Conference on Geosynthetics, February 20th - 23rd, 2023, Cairo, Egypt, published in E3S Web of Conferences Vol. 368, p. 02002 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Paruvakat and G. Richardson, Landfill Cover Failure Prompts Standards Upgrade, GFR Magazine, 17, No 7, IFAI (1999) [Google Scholar]
  3. D.J. Kerkes, Analysis of Equipment Loads on Geocomposite Liner Systems, Proc. of Geosynthetics ’99 held April 28-30, 1999 in Boston, MA. IFAI, pp. 1043-1054. (1999) [Google Scholar]
  4. D.R.V. Jones, N. Dixon, and A. Connell, Effect of Landfill Construction Activities on Mobilized Interface Shear Strength, Proc. EuroGeo 2000, Bologna, Italy, pp. 581-586 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Thiel and D. Narejo, Lamination strength requirements for geonet drainage geocomposite, Proceedings of the 18th Annual GRI Conference/ASCE Geofrontiers Conference, Austin, TX (2005) [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Richardson and R.M. Koerner, Geosynthetic Design Guidance for Hazardous Waste Landfill Cells and Surface Impoundments., EPA-600/2-87-097. USEPA, (1987) [Google Scholar]
  7. R.M. Koerner and T.Y. Soong, Analysis and Design of Veneer Cover Soils, Proc. of 6th Int’l Conf. on Geosynthetics, 25-29 March 1998, Atlanta, GA, IFAI, (1998) [Google Scholar]
  8. X. Qian, R.M. Koerner, and D. Gray, Geotechnical Aspects of Landfill Design and Construction, Pearson (publ), 1st Ed. (2001) [Google Scholar]
  9. S.J. Drushel and E.R. Underwood, Design of Lining and Cover System Side Slopes, Proc. of Geosynthetics ’93, Vancouver B.C. IFAI, pp. 1341-1355 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  10. J.A. McKelvey, Consideration of Equipment Loadings in Geosynthetic Lined Slope Designs, Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Siriwardane and Zaman (Eds.) Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 1371-1377 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  11. USEPA, EPA (Draft) Technical Guidance For RCRA/CERCLA Final Covers, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA 540-R-04-007, OSWER 9283.1-26, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Thiel, Selection of long-term shear strength parameters for strain softening geosynthetic interfaces, 12th International Conference on Geosynthetics – “Geosynthetics: leading the way to a resilient planet”, Biondi et al. (eds) – Roma (Italy) September 17-21 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  13. T.D. Stark, H. Choi, C. Lee, and B. Queen, Compacted Soil Liner Interface Strength Importance, ASCE JGGE, 138 N4, pp. 544-550 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. H.F. Winterkorn and H.Y. Fang, Foundation Engineering Handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1975) [Google Scholar]
  15. SAE, Standard J1265, Capacity Rating - Dozer Blades. (2003) [Google Scholar]
  16. AASHTO, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6th Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. (2011) [Google Scholar]
  17. FHWA, Friction Angles of Open-Graded Aggregates from Large Scale Direct Shear Testing, Techbrief FHWA-HRT-13-068, Federal Highway Administration, (2013) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.