EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 609 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 609 (2025) 07001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 609, 2025
The 7th International Conference on Multidiscipline Approaches for Sustainable Rural Development (ICMA SURE 2024)
Article Number 07001
Number of page(s) 9
Section Public Policy and Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560907001
Published online 24 January 2025
  1. S. Macdonald and B. Birdi, “The concept of neutrality: a new approach,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 333–353, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/JD-05-2019-0102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. H. H. Noer, “Portrait of the Politicization of Indonesian Bureaucracy in the 2024 Election,” International Journal of Social Service and Research, vol. 4, no. 03, pp. 752–769, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.46799/ijssr.v4i03.735. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arend Lijphart, Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. London: Yale University Press, 1984. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Hadiyantina, “The most appropriate strategy to enhance civil servants’ neutrality in the governance,” Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 61–78, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1108/jeas-03-2019-0031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Essex and N. Goodman, “Protecting Electoral Integrity in the Digital Age: Developing E-Voting Regulations in Canada,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 162–179, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1089/elj.2019.0568. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Boukes and R. Vliegenthart, “A general pattern in constructing economic newsworthiness? Analysing news factors in popular, quality, regional, and financial newspapers,” Journalism, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 279–300, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1464884917725989. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Eilders, “News factors and news decisions. Theoretical and methodological advances in Germany,” Communications, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 5–24, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1515/COMMUN.2006.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Jacobs, J. Boon, A. Wonneberger, and H. H. Salomonsen, “Exploring Media-Covered Accountability of Public Agencies,” Adm Soc, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 575–604, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1177/00953997211036353. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pamela J. Shoemaker and Timothy Vos, gatekeeping Theory, 1st ed. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Trelles, M. Altman, E. Magar, and M. McDonald, “No Accountability Without Transparency and Consistency: Evaluating Mexico’s Redistricting-by-Formula,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 80–99, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1089/elj.2021.0061. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. E. Stemler and S. Stemler, “An Overview of Content Analysis,” 2014. [Online]. Available: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17 [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Eilders, “News factors and news decisions. Theoretical and methodological advances in Germany,” Communications, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 5–24, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1515/COMMUN.2006.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D. P. Tokaji, “Laboratories of Election Reform,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 267–275, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1089/elj.2009.8312. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. B. E. Cain and J. A. Desveaux, “The Skeptical Pluralist: Nelson Polsby’s Contributions to the Study of Political Reform,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 287–300, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1089/elj.2008.7402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sri Chatun, “Netralitas Birokrasi: Menjernihkan Pola Hubungan Pemerintah dan Birokrasi,” Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 3851–3858, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.55927/mudima.v2i10.1617. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. A. Garnett, “Behind the Screens: E-Government in American State Election Administration,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 402–417, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1089/elj.2019.0586. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Anne-Lise, “The Short and Winding Road to 2030: Measuring Distance to the SDG Targets,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/unsdg [Google Scholar]
  18. Z. Sekretariat, K. Kabupaten, and H. Tengah, “MENAKAR POTENSI PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK PENYELENGGARA PEMILU: SEBUAH ANALISIS TEORI STRUKTURASI.” [Online]. Available: www.journal.kpu.go.id [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Porter and J. C. Rogowski, “Partisanship, Bureaucratic Responsiveness, and Election Administration: Evidence from a Field Experiment,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 602–617, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1093/part/muy025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. F. Anechiarico, “elj.2006.5.201,” vol. 5, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. G. Decrescenzo and K. R. Mayer, “Voter Identification and Nonvoting in Wisconsin-Evidence from the 2016 Election,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 342–359, Dec. 2019, doi:10.1089/elj.2018.0536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. J. H. Fiva, B. Geys, T. R. Heggedal, and R. Sørensen, “Political Alignment and Bureaucratic Pay,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 596–615, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1093/jopart/muaa053. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Bailey, “The Two Sides of Money in Politics: A Synthesis and Framework,” 2004. [Online]. Available: www.opensecrets.org/overview/blio.asp. [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Levy, “The Law of Deliberative Democracy: Seeding the Field,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 355–371, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1089/elj.2013.1242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Rush, “Review of Fragile Democracies by Samuel Issacharoff,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 193–195, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1089/elj.2016.0374. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mara Suttmann-Lea and Thessalia Merivaki, “Can electoral management bodies expand the pool of registered voters? Examining the effects of face-to-face, remote, traditional, and social media outreach,” pp. 377–407, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  27. P. Brassiolo, R. Estrada, and G. Fajardo, “My (running) mate, the mayor: Political ties and access to public sector jobs in Ecuador ☆,” 2020. [Google Scholar]
  28. H. Dagan, “Political Money,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 349–367, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1089/elj.2009.0040. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. J. D. Hostetter, “Portable Poll Workers: Eliminating Precinct Requirements in U.S. Elections,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 392–401, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1089/elj.2019.0565. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Kropf, “Academic Scholarship and Election Official Perspectives at the Election Science, Reform, and Administration Conference,” in Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, Mary Ann Liebert Inc., Jun. 2023, pp. 101–104. doi: 10.1089/elj.2023.29004.mkr. [Google Scholar]
  31. B. C. Burden, D. T. Canon, K. R. Mayer, and D. P. Moynihan, “Early Voting and Election Day Registration in the Trenches: Local Officials’ Perceptions of Election Reform,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 89–102, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1089/elj.2010.0082. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. R. H. Pildes, “Book Review Competitive, Deliberative, and Rights-Oriented Democracy,” 2004. [Google Scholar]
  33. G. Orr, B. Mercurio, and G. Williams, “Australian Electoral Law: A Stocktake,” 2003. [Online]. Available: www.australianpolitics.com/ [Google Scholar]
  34. K. Barbosa et al., “Occupy Government: Democracy and the Dynamics of Personnel Decisions and Public Sector Performance,” 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.nber.org/papers/w25501 [Google Scholar]
  35. guy-U. e. charles, “153312903321578232,”2003. [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Story, G. Lotta, and G. M. Tavares, “(Mis)Led by an Outsider: Abusive Supervision, Disengagement, and Silence in Politicized Bureaucracies,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 549–562, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1093/part/muad004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. L. Ennser-Jedenastik, “The politicisation of regulatory agencies: Between partisan influence and formal independence,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 507–518, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1093/part/muv022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. N. Kerr, “Manipulating Elections Across the World,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 109–114, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1089/elj.2015.0355. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. A. Lioz, “Limiting the Limits: Principles to Protect Free Expression while Fighting the Power of Big Money in Politics,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 57–74, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1089/elj.2016.0400. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. M. W. Bauer and S. Becker, “Democratic Backsliding, Populism, and Public Administration,” Perspect Public Manag Gov, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 19–31, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1093/ppmv/gvz026. [Google Scholar]
  41. R. Levy, “The deliberative case for constitutional referenda,” in Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, Mary Ann Liebert Inc., Jun. 2017, pp. 213–221. doi: 10.1089/elj.2016.0412. [Google Scholar]
  42. R. Briffault, “The Anxiety of Influence: The Evolving Regulation of Lobbying,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 160–193, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1089/elj.2014.0245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. D. S. Lee, “Lee,” 2019. Principles to Protect Free Expression. Election Law Journal. Mar. 2017, doi: 10.079/elj.2019.04200 [Google Scholar]
  44. W. Chang Kang and B. Song, “Electronic copy available,” 2016. [Online]. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2841566at:http://ssrn. com/abstract=2841566 [Google Scholar]
  45. A. C. Eggers and A. Spirling, “Incumbency effects and the strength of party preferences: Evidence from multiparty elections in the United Kingdom,” Journal of Politics, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 903–920, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1086/690617. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. S. Pailler, “Re-election incentives and deforestation cycles in the Brazilian Amazon,” J Environ Econ Manage, vol. 88, pp. 345–365, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. L. De Magalhaes, “Incumbency effects in a comparative perspective: Evidence from Brazilian mayoral elections,” Political Analysis, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 113–126, 2015, doi: 10.1093/pan/mpu012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.