Open Access
Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 611, 2025
2nd International Symposium on Environmental and Energy Policy (ISEEP 2024)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01001 | |
Number of page(s) | 11 | |
Section | Climate Change, Sustainability, and Coastal Management | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561101001 | |
Published online | 24 January 2025 |
- M. H. C. Meijers, E. S. Smit, K. De Wildt, and S. Karvonen, “Stimulating Sustainable Food Choices Using Virtual Reality : Taking an Environmental vs Health Communication Perspective on Enhancing Response Efficacy Beliefs Stimulating Sustainable Food Choices Using Virtual Reality : Taking an Environmental vs Health,” Environ. Commun., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17524032.2021.1943700. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. M. Rice and J. L. S. Jahn, “Disaster resilience as communication practice: remembering and forgetting lessons from past disasters through practices that prepare for the next one,” J. Appl. Commun. Res., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 136–155, 2020, doi: 10.1080/00909882.2019.1704830. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Rochim, A. Bajari, N. A. Damayani, and I. Bakti, “Community-based disaster communication management,” J. Komun. Malaysian J. Commun., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 339–350, 2020, doi: 10.17576/JKMJC-2020-3604-21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gunawan, H., Kobayashi, S., Mizuno, K., & Kono, Y. (2012). Peat swamp forest types and their regeneration in Giam Siak Kecil-Bukit Batu Biosphere Reserve, Riau, East Sumatra, Indonesia. Mires & Peat, 10. [Google Scholar]
- Mubarak, S. Sutikno, A. Defarian, K. Murakami, and K. Yamamoto, “Numerical simulation of detached breakwaters for mangrove restoration in Bengkalis Island, Indonesia,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 276, p. 04005, 2019, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201927604005. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- W. S. Rice, “Exploring common dialectical tensions constraining collaborative communication required for post-2020 conservation,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 316, no. May, p. 115187, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. K. Gislason, L. Galway, C. Buse, M. Parkes, and E. Rees, “Place-based Climate Change Communication and Engagement in Canada’s Provincial North: Lessons Learned from Climate Champions,” Environ. Commun., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 530–545, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17524032.2020.1869576. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Degeling and R. Koolen, “Communicating Climate Change to a Local but Diverse Audience: On the Positive Impact of Locality Framing,” Environ. Commun., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 243–261, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17524032.2021.1998177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Buncag, M. J. J. (2021). Community-based mangrove forest management sustainability: The case of some Asian countries. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 10(4), 918–26. Buncag, M. J. J. (2021). Community-based mangrove forest management sustainability: The case of some Asian countries. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 10(4), 918–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kongkeaw, C., Kittitornkool, J., Vandergeest, P., & Kittiwatanawong, K. (2019). Explaining success in community based mangrove management: Four coastal communities along the Andaman Sea, Thailand. Ocean & Coastal Management, 178, 104822. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. N. Tamalene, H. M. I. Al Muhdhar, S. Endang, and R. Fatkhur, “The Practice of Local Wisdom of Tobelo Dalam (Togutil) Tribal Community in Forest Conservation in Halmahera, Indonesia,” Int. J. Plant Res., vol. 2014, no. 4A, pp. 1–7, 2014, doi: 10.5923/s.plant.201401.01. [Google Scholar]
- L. Mercer et al., “Towards more inclusive and solution orientated community-based environmental monitoring,” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 18, no. 6, p. 64003, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/accfb0. [Google Scholar]
- A. P. Meidina and A. Murfi, “Environmental communication and disaster mitigation by mobile application and website,” J. Kaji. Komun., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 60–79, 2024, doi: 10.24198/jkk.v12i1.53996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N. W. Primayanti and V. Puspita, “Local wisdom narrative in environmental campaign,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 9, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2022.2090062. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N. Suryandari and Q. N. Wijayani, “Environmental Communication, Local Wisdom, and Mitigation of Sampang Flood,” Komunikator, vol. 13, no. 1, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jkm/article/view/10666. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. A. Baudoin, S. Henly-Shepard, N. Fernando, A. Sitati, and Z. Zommers, “From Top-Down to ‘Community-Centric’ Approaches to Early Warning Systems: Exploring Pathways to Improve Disaster Risk Reduction Through Community Participation,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 163–174, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s13753-016-0085-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ting-Toomey, S., & Dorjee, T. (2018). Communicating across cultures. Guilford Publications. [Google Scholar]
- M. E. Villar, “Community Engagement and Co-creation of Strategic Health and Environemtnal Communication: Collaborative Storytelling and Game-building,” JCOM, vol. 20, no. 01, pp. 1–9, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- P. Waititu, “Creating Community Based Environmental Awareness with Social Media: A Kenyan perspective,” South. African J. Environ. Educ., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 27–42, 2021, doi: 10.4314/sajee.v37i1.2. [Google Scholar]
- R. Han and Y. Cheng, “The influence of norm perception on pro-environmental behavior: A comparison between the moderating roles of traditional media and social media,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 19, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197164. [Google Scholar]
- M. M. Bayrak, “Does Indigenous tourism contribute to Indigenous resilience to disasters? A case study on Taiwan’s highlands,” Prog. Disaster Sci., vol. 14, p. 100220, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Nurzaman, R. Shaw, and M. S. Roychansyah, “Measuring community resilience against coastal hazards: Case study in Baron Beach, Gunungkidul Regency,” Prog. Disaster Sci., vol. 5, p. 100067, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100067. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Nkombi and G. J. Wentink, “The role of public participation in disaster risk reduction initiatives: The case of Katlehong township,” Jamba J. Disaster Risk Stud., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1203. [Google Scholar]
- P. Baxter and S. Jack, “Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers,” Qual. Rep., no. January, 2015, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573. [Google Scholar]
- K. M. Alpi and J. J. Evans, “Distinguishing case study as a research method from case reports as a publication type,” J. Med. Libr. Assoc., vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2019, doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.615. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Lin, “Social media for collaborative planning: A typology of support functions and challenges,” Cities, vol. 125, no. July 2022, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103641. [Google Scholar]
- D. Purworini, D. Purnamasari, and D. P. Hartuti, “Crisis communication in a natural disaster: A chaos theory approach,” J. Komun. Malaysian J. Commun., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 35–48, 2019, doi: 10.17576/JKMJC-2019-3502-03. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. A. Sattar et al., “Disaster vulnerability and mitigation of humanitarian issues in coastal Bangladesh: Local evidence and knowledge gaps,” Prog. Disaster Sci., vol. 8, p. 100138, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Paton and M. Irons, “Communication, Sense of Community, and Disaster Recovery: A Facebook Case Study,” Front. Commun., vol. 1, no. July, 2016, doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2016.00004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. C. Boerman, M. H. C. Meijers, and W. Zwart, “The Importance of Influencer-Message Congruence When Employing Greenfluencers to Promote Pro-Environmental Behavior,” Environ. Commun., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17524032.2022.2115525. [Google Scholar]
- P. Mazzoglio, S. Macchia, E. Gallo, J. Winter, and P. Claps, “Disaster Tales as Communication Tool for Increasing Risk Resilience,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 341–354, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13753-021-00341-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.