Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 611, 2025
2nd International Symposium on Environmental and Energy Policy (ISEEP 2024)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Climate Change, Sustainability, and Coastal Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561101005
Published online 24 January 2025
  1. P. W. A. A. R. S. B. Rima Wahyu Utari; Muhammad Iqbal: Alda Rahayu Felia Manurung, “Kebijakan Perlindungan Ekosistem Lahan Gambut (Konversi Lahan Gambut) Terhadap Ketahanan Lingkungan di Daerah Aliran Sungai Kapuas, Desa Teluk Empening, Kecamatan Terentang, Kabupaten Kubu Raya, Kalimantan Barat,” pp. 1–36, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. D. N. Pratiwi, “Pengaruh Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan Gambut terhadap Lingkungan Hidup,” Artik. PN Pulang Pisau, pp. 1–11, 2022, Online.. Available: http://kpm.ipb.ac.id/karyailmiah/index.php/studipustaka/article/view/7420 [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Ortiz-Miranda et al., “The future of small farms and small food businesses as actors in regional food security: A participatory scenario analysis from Europe and Africa,” J. Rural Stud., vol. 95, no. August 2021, pp. 326–335, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Suryana, “MENUJU KETAHANAN PANGAN INDONESIA BERKELANJUTAN 2025 : TANTANGAN DAN PENANGANANNYA Toward Sustainable Indonesian Food Security 2025 : Challenges and Its Responses,” pp. 123–135, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Agus and I. G. M. Subiksa, Lahan Gambut : Potensi untuk Pertanian dan Aspek Lingkungan. 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.031. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Nurdiana, Y. Setiawan, H. Pawitan, L. B. Prasetyo, and P. A. Permatasari, “Land Changes Monitoring Using MODIS Time-series Imagery in Peat Lands Areas, Muaro Jambi, Jambi Province, Indonesia,” Procedia Environ. Sci., vol. 33, no. April, pp. 443–449, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.095. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. P. Kirana, I. S. Sitanggang, and L. Syaufina, “Hotspot Pattern Distribution in Peat Land Area in Sumatera Based on Spatio Temporal Clustering,” Procedia Environ. Sci., vol. 33, no. April, pp. 635–645, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Mockshell and R. Birner, “Donors and domestic policy makers: Two worlds in agricultural policy-making?,” Food Policy, vol. 55, no. August 2015, pp. 1–14, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.05.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. S. Saint Ville, G. M. Hickey, and L. E. Phillip, “How do stakeholder interactions influence national food security policy in the Caribbean? The case of Saint Lucia,” Food Policy, vol. 68, pp. 53–64, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.01.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. K. A. Brown et al., “Moving towards sustainable food systems: A review of Indian food policy budgets,” Glob. Food Sec., vol. 28, no. August 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100462. [Google Scholar]
  11. N. W. Smith, Food Policy. Elsevier, 2016. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100596-5.03428-4. [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Béné, D. Bakker, M. J. Chavarro, B. Even, J. Melo, and A. Sonneveld, “Global assessment of the impacts of COVID-19 on food security,” Glob. Food Sec., vol. 31, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100575. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Kalimullina and M. (Shamil) Orlov, “Islamic finance and food commodity trading: is there a chance to hedge against price volatility and enhance food security?,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11, p. e05355, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05355. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Leach, N. Nisbett, L. Cabral, J. Harris, N. Hossain, and J. Thompson, “Food politics and development,” World Dev., vol. 134, p. 105024, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Ericksen et al., “The value of a food system approach,” Food Secur. Glob. Environ. Chang., no. August 2016, pp. 25–45, 2012, doi: 10.4324/9781849776615-11. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Arcuri, B. Minotti, and F. Galli, “Food policy integration in small cities: The case of intermunicipal governance in Lucca, Italy,” J. Rural Stud., vol. 89, no. November 2021, pp. 287–297, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.12.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Doernberg, P. Horn, I. Zasada, and A. Piorr, “Urban food policies in German city regions: An overview of key players and policy instruments,” Food Policy, vol. 89, no. June 2017, p. 101782, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101782. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Alpha and E. Fouilleux, “How to diagnose institutional conditions conducive to intersectoral food security policies? The example of Burkina Faso,” NJAS Wageningen J. Life Sci., vol. 84, no. August 2017, pp. 114–122, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.njas.2017.07.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Briones Alonso, L. Cockx, and J. Swinnen, “Culture and food security,” Glob. Food Sec., vol. 17, no. February, pp. 113–127, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2018.02.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. E. K. Ilboudo Nébié, D. Ba, and A. Giannini, “Food security and climate shocks in Senegal: Who and where are the most vulnerable households?,” Glob. Food Sec., vol. 29, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100513. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Elo, M. Kääriäinen, O. Kanste, T. Pölkki, K. Utriainen, and H. Kyngäs, “Qualitative Content Analysis,” SAGE Open, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 215824401452263, 2014, doi: 10.1177/2158244014522633. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.