Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 611, 2025
2nd International Symposium on Environmental and Energy Policy (ISEEP 2024)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 11
Section Energy, Environment Communication, and Awareness
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561102003
Published online 24 January 2025
  1. A. Pena-Vega, “A consciência da incerteza: os desafios de uma política de “TerraPátria,” EccoS – Revista Científica, no. 57, pp. 1–18, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.5585/eccos.n57.20271. [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Kaul, “Environmental Crisis and the Role of Media,” International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, vol. Volume-1, no. Issue-4, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.31142/ijtsrd2217. [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Liu and S. S. Wu, “Green finance, sustainability disclosure and economic implications,” Fulbright Review of Economics and Policy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–24, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1108/FREP-03-2022-0021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Zhang, “Impact of green finance and environmental protection on green economic recovery in South Asian economies: mediating role of FinTech,” Economic Change and Restructuring, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 2069–2086, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10644-023-09500-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. F. D. Sulaksana, “Green Financing : One Effort Achieving Sustainable Development,” Banking and Management Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1592–1603, May 2023, doi: 10.52250/bmr.v11i2.562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Weiss, “The reproduction of capital through financial education,” Econ Soc, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 312–328, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1080/03085147.2019.1690278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. S. Sukirman and W. Dianawati, “Green intellectual capital and financial performance: The moderate of family ownership,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 10, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2200498. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. H. V. Jariwala, “Do financial education workshops enhance parent–adolescent communication about money?,” Managerial Finance, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 829–846, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1108/MF-09-2021-0469. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. G. Payne, “Families, Homes and Environmental Education,” Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 21, pp. 81–95, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1017/S0814062600000975. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. M. Rohim, A. Haryono, and C. Wardoyo, “The Effect of Financial Education in The Family, Financial Literature, and Self-Control on Financial Management through Consumption Rationality,” Journal of Economics Education and Entrepreneurship, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.20527/jee.v3i1.5131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Khalatur and O. Dubovych, “Financial Engineering of Green Finance as an Element of Environmental Innovation Management,” Marketing and Management of Innovations, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 232–246, 2022, doi: 10.21272/mmi.2022.1-17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. K. Ozili, “Theories of Sustainable Finance,” Managing Global Transitions, vol. 21, no. 1, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.26493/1854-6935.21.5-22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Filipava and F. Murshudli, “The Development of the Global Green Finance Market: The Role of Banks and Non-banking Institutional Investors,” 2023, pp. 27–46. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-29031-2_2. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. A. Sitnik, “Green Finance: The Concept and System,” Actual Problems of Russian Law, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 63–80, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.17803/1994-1471.2022.135.2.063-080. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Anderson and D. T. Robinson, “Financial Literacy in the Age of Green Investment,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3353534. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Petro, R. Octavia, and M. I. Diarsyad, “Pengaruh Corporate Governance Terhadap Green Banking Disclosure(Studi Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Di Indonesia Yang Terdaftar Di BEI Periode 2018 –2020),” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Global Masa Kini, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 7–14, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.36982/jiegmk.v14i1.2814. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. F. Couto, K. F. B. Maracajá, and P. de A. Machado, “Financial Education and Sustainability: A Conceptual Framework,” Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, vol. 23, no. 3, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.13058/raep.2022.v23n3.2239. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. C. M. C. Chandran and B. Sathiyabama, “Consumer education on green banking for sustainable environment,” Int J Health Sci (Qassim), pp. 1328–1340, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.5558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Lončar and S. Poljak Istenič, “Local (Traditional) Knowledge as the Key for Sustainable Rural Development: Utopia or Reality? (Introduction to thematic section),” Studia ethnologica Croatica, vol. 28, pp. 11–20, 2016, doi: 10.17234/SEC.28.1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Nath, “Tales, Toys, and Traditions: Enacting a Culture of Sustainable Lifestyles,” Child Educ, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 24–31, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080/00094056.2023.2232278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Qasim, W. Ahmed, and R. Frooghi, “Influence of employees’ beliefs and values on shaping green work culture for boosting firm’s environmental performance,” International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJOES-062022-0120. [Google Scholar]
  22. I. B. Neumann, “Ethnography,” in Routledge Handbook of Foreign Policy Analysis Methods, London: Routledge, 2022, pp. 39–50. doi: 10.4324/9781003139850-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Skukauskaitė, “Ethnography: foundations, challenges, and spaces of possibilities,” in International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition), Elsevier, 2023, pp. 92–101. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.11011-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Waring and J. Clarke, “Ethnography,” in Implementation Science, London: Routledge, 2022, pp. 106–107. doi: 10.4324/9781003109945-30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. F. L. Sosenko and G. Bramley, “Smartphone-based Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS): A methodological advance in surveying small or ‘hard-to-reach’ populations,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 7, p. e0270673, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270673. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. H. Lee and M. Hong, “Efficient Management of Government Advertising : Focusing on Expert Depth Interviews,” Journal of Media Economics & Culture, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 41–71, May 2023, doi: 10.21328/JMEC.2023.5.21.2.41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Pervin and M. Mokhtar, “The Interpretivist Research Paradigm: A Subjective Notion of a Social Context,” International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, vol. 11, no. 2, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/12938. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Y. Taylor, F. Edgar, and A. M. Everett, “Insights From the Application of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in Management Research,” 2023, pp. 23–42. doi: 10.1108/S1479-838720220000014003. [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Morgan, “Conducting a Qualitative Document Analysis,” The Qualitative Report, vol. 27, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044. [Google Scholar]
  30. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual Res Psychol, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. B. I. Collier-Reed, Å. Ingerman, and A. Berglund, “Reflections on trustworthiness in phenomenographic research: Recognising purpose, context and change in the process of research,” Education as Change, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 339–355, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1080/16823200903234901. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Hamal, “Trust in Ethnography: Narrating the Difficulties, Rewards and Dilemmas of Entry, Engagement and Exit (3Es) in the Research Field,” Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, vol. 14, pp. 97–105, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3126/dsaj.v14i0.28521. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. P. J. Fisher, “Income Uncertainty and Household Saving in the United States,” Fam Consum Sci Res J, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 57–74, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.15523934.2010.02045.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Y. Wen, “Saving and Growth under Borrowing Constraints: -Explaining the ‘High Saving Rate’ Puzzle,” St. Louis, MO, USA, 2009. doi: 10.20955/wp.2009.045. [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Franziska, “Saving and wealth in the context of extreme inequality,” 2017. Accessed: Aug. 30, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/102743 [Google Scholar]
  36. L. Hamilton, “Assets and Household Stability,” 2020, pp. 61–77. doi: 10.1007/9783-030-37121-0_4. [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Shoham and M. Malul, “The role of cultural attributes in savings rates,” Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 304–314, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1108/13527601211247062. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. A. B. Dar, N. Bhanja, M. Paul, and U. Farooq, “Shaping a greener tomorrow: Analysing the impact of environment-friendly technology on ecological footprints in emerging asian economies,” J Clean Prod, vol. 452, p. 142130, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. R. Kurniadi, W. Nia Puspita, P. Sari, and M. Agustin, “Pengelolaa Sumber Daya Berorientasi Green Economy,” Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan STIE Muhammadiyah Palopo, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 141–157, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.35906/JEP.V9I1.1467. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. V. Mayasari, R. Haribowo, and H. Siswoyo, “Local wisdom technology, management of water and land resources, as an effort to anticipate and mitigate climate change,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 1359, no. 1, p. 012085, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1359/1/012085. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. R. Kurniadi, “PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR PENDIDIKAN LINGKUNGAN BERBASIS KEARIFAN LOKAL,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Lingkungan dan Pembangunan, vol. 19, no. 02, pp. 27–38, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.21009/PLPB.192.03. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. L. Volosciuc and V. Josu, “Ecological Agriculture to Mitigate Soil Fatigue,” in Soil as World Heritage, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014, pp. 431–435. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6187-2_45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. I. K. Aryani and R. B. W. Kertopati, “Local wisdom tradition of maintenance of the upstream river,” JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), vol. 10, no. 2, p. 439, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.29210/020243945. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.