Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 611, 2025
2nd International Symposium on Environmental and Energy Policy (ISEEP 2024)
Article Number 05003
Number of page(s) 10
Section International Cooperation, Economic, and Technological Implications
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561105003
Published online 24 January 2025
  1. Y. Lu et al., “Major threats of pollution and climate change to global coastal ecosystems and enhanced management for sustainability,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 239, pp. 670–680, Aug. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Kraska, “National Security Considerations for a Binding Instrument on Managing Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction,” AJIL Unbound, vol. 112, pp. 150–154, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2018.43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. W. H. Hananto, “Current Developments of Legal Instruments to Prevent and Control of Pollution in The Straits of Malacca,” Administrative Law and Governance Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 721–732, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i4.721-732. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Beckman, “Singapore Strives to Enhance Safety, Security, and Environmental Protection in Its Port and in The Straits of Malacca and Singapore,” Ocean and Coastal Law Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 167–200, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/oclj http://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/oclj/vol14/iss2/3 http://www.singstat.gov.sg/stats/themes/people/hist/popn.html. [Google Scholar]
  5. X. Qu and Q. Meng, “The economic importance of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore: An extreme-scenario analysis,” Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 258–265, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.08.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. N. Tabish and T. Chaur-Luh, “Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships: A Review of Cybersecurity Challenges, Countermeasures, and Future Perspectives,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 17114–17136, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3357082. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. G. A. Bowen, “Document analysis as a qualitative research method,” Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 27–40, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 7th Edition. New Jersey: Wiley, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 4th Edition. Washington, DC: SAGE Publications, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Akbar, A. Setiawan, R. Prayuda, A. Putra, A. Aznor, and W. E. Yudiatmaja, “Community Preparedness on Transboundary Oil Spill Governance in Bintan Island,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1655, no. 1, p. 012144, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. L. Ning, Z. L. Chen, C. Y. Wang, and W. J. Xie, “Analysis of Marine Oil Spill Pollution Monitoring Based on Satellite Remote Sensing Technology,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 392, p. 042045, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/392/4/042045. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Buzan and Ole. Wæver, Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. A. Sulistyani, “Diplomasi Pertahanan Littoral States di Selat Malaka Melalui Kerangka Patroli Selat Malaka,” Jurnal Pertahanan dan Bela Negara, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 41–50, 2019. Accessed: Nov. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.idu.ac.id/index.php/JPBH/article/view/563 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Supriyatno, Tentang Ilmu Pertahanan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Simamora, Peluang dan Tantangan Diplomasi Pertahanan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Till, Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-First Century. UK: Routledge, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Putri, R. Windiani, and M. Hanura, “Kerjasama Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Singapura di Selat Malaka,” Journal of International Relations, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 250–257, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14710/jirud.v2i3.12495. [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Brewster, “An Indian Sphere of Influence in the Indian Ocean?,” Security Challenges, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–20, 2010. Accessed: Nov. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26459796 [Google Scholar]
  19. P. G. Harris, Environmental Change and Foreign Policy Theory and Practice, 1st Edition. UK: Routledge, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Chao, C. Liu, Y. Li, X. Lin, and Y. Yan, “Characteristics of the sea ice reflectance spectrum polluted by oil spills based on field experiments in the Bohai Sea,” Acta Oceanologica Sinica, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 73–79, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-017-0995-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Teramoto, S. Y. Queck, and K. Ohnishi, “Specialized Hydrocarbonoclastic Bacteria Prevailing in Seawater around a Port in the Strait of Malacca,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 6, p. e66594, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066594. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Li, H. Yu, J. Yan, and J. Liao, “Analysis of Offshore Oil Spill Pollution Treatment Technology,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 510, no. 4, p. 042011, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/510/4/042011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sentinel Success Stories, “Copernicus Sentinels help monitor ship traffic.” Accessed: Nov. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sentiwiki.copernicus.eu/web/sentinel-2 [Google Scholar]
  24. ISPRS Archives, “AIS and SAR Applications for Maritime Surveillance.” Accessed: Nov. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.isprs.org/publications/archives.aspx [Google Scholar]
  25. R. O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.