Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 617, 2025
2024 International Conference on Environment Engineering, Urban Planning and Design (EEUPD 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03012 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Study on Sustainable Urban and Rural Development and Spatial Planning | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561703012 | |
| Published online | 21 February 2025 | |
- Yuan, X., Li, Z., Xu, J., & Shang, L. (2022). ESG disclosure and corporate financial irregularities: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 332, 129-992. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Y., Zhao, D., & Cao, Y. (2024). The impact of ESG perfor- mance, reporting framework, and reporting assurance on the tone of ESG disclosures: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142-698. [Google Scholar]
- Mallin, C., Michelon, G., & Raggi, D. (2013). Monitoring intensity and stakeholders’ orientation: How does governance affect social and environmental disclosure? Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 29-43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Panwar, R., Nawani, S., & Pandey, V. (2018). Legislated CSR: A Brief Introduction. In: Corporate Social Responsibility; Business and Society 360. Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 133-146. [Google Scholar]
- Bifulco, G. M., Savio, R., Paolone, F., & Tiscini, R. (2023). The CSR committee as moderator for the ESG score and market value. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(6), 3231-3241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cordazzo, M., Bini, L., & Marzo, G. (2020). Does the EU directive on non-financial information influence the value relevance of ESG disclosure? Italian evidence. Business Strategy and the Environ- ment, 29(8), 3470-3483. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ali, W., Frynas, J. G., & Mahmood, Z. (2017). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 273-294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bravo, F., & Reguera-Alvarado, N. (2018). Sustainable develop- ment disclosure: Environmental, social, and governance reporting and gender diversity in the audit committee. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 418-429. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, E. P.-Y., Guo, C. Q., & Luu, B. V. (2018). Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value. Business Strategy and The Environment, 27, 987-1004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gjergji, R., Vena, L., Sciascia, S., & Cortesi, A. (2020). The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosure on the cost of capital in small and medium enterprises: The role of family business status. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 683-693. [Google Scholar]
- Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior. New York: The Free Press. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. [Google Scholar]
- Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 613-624. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kolk, A. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in the coffee sector: The dynamics of MNC responses and code development. European Management Journal. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Q., & Lu, Y. (2018). “ Following the Trend” or “ Strategic Choice”: Response Mechanisms of Corporate Social Responsibility. Nankai Business Review, 21(4), 169-181. (in China) [Google Scholar]
- Bardos, K. S., Ertugrul, M., & Gao, L. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility, product market perception, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(46), 124-135. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, T., Xiao, X., & Zhang, B. (2021). Economic policy uncer- tainty and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 12(5), 1003-1026. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.