Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 617, 2025
2024 International Conference on Environment Engineering, Urban Planning and Design (EEUPD 2024)
Article Number 03020
Number of page(s) 7
Section Study on Sustainable Urban and Rural Development and Spatial Planning
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561703020
Published online 21 February 2025
  1. Dikken, J., van den Hoven, R. F. M., van Staalduinen, W. H., Hulsebosch-Janssen, L. M. T. & van Hoof, J. (2020). How Older People Experience the Age- Friendliness of Their City: Development of the Age- Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 17, 6867. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ann, B., Denise. (2001). Elder-friendly plans and planners’ effort to involve older citizens in the plan- making process. (University of New Orleans.). [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen Chongxian, Luo Weijing, Li Haiwei, Xia Yu, & Xie Chao. (2021). Research Progress on the Relationship Between Residential Area Landscape Environment and Elderly Health. Southern Architecture, 22–28. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhuang Yini & Chen Dan. (2019). The Impact of Residential Area Plant Landscapes on Elderly Neighbors' Social Interaction—A Case Study of Hongkou District, Shanghai. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Agricultural Science Edition), 37, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng Xuefei, Wang Shufen, & Wu Qingru. (2017).Research and Application on the Correlation Between Community Landscape Environment and Outdoor Activities of Elderly People. In Sustainable Development and Rational Planning—Proceedings of the 2017 China Urban Planning Annual Conference (Housing Construction Planning) (ed. Chinese Society of Urban Planning), 22 (China Architecture & Building Press, Dongguan, Guangdong, China). [Google Scholar]
  6. Marston, H. R. & van Hoof, J. (2019). “Who Doesn’t Think about Technology When Designing Urban Environments for Older People?” A Case Study Approach to a Proposed Extension of the WHO’s Age-Friendly Cities Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 16, 3525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang Yiming, Li Xue, & Li Bin. (2021). Research on the Functional Integration Strategies of Community Day Care Facilities Based on the Needs of the Elderly. Modern Urban Research, 65–71, 105. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hao Liang. (2016). Building a Community-Based Home Care Service Supply System—A Demand- Oriented Approach for the Elderly. Modern Business, 190–191. [Google Scholar]
  9. Conway, S. F., Farrell, M., McDonagh, J. & Nolan, N. (2024). Creating an Age-Friendly Environment in Farming – The Farmer’s Yards Approach. J. Agromedicine. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gallagher, E., Menec, D. V. & Keefe, D. J. (2006). Age-friendly rural and remote communities: A guide. Public Health Agency Can. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, Y., Pan, Z., Liu, Y. & Li, Z. (2023). Can living in an age-friendly neighbourhood protect older adults’ mental health against functional decline in China? Landsc. Urban Plan. 240, 104897. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yu Yifan, Zhu Feiyang, Jia Shuying, Guo Yuting, & Hu Yuting. (2020). Research on the Evaluation System of Elderly-Friendly Communities. Shanghai Urban Planning, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  13. Guo Yawen, Fu Hua, Tang Yuyang, Lü Zhe, & Ding Xiaocang. (2016). Survey Results Analysis of Core Indicators for Elderly-Friendly Cities. Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 717–723, 751. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li Shan & Yang Zhongzhen. (2012). Research on the Connotation and Evaluation System of Urban Elderly-Friendly Communities. Northwest Population, 33, 17–21, 26. [Google Scholar]
  15. An Haoyuan. (2014). Research on the Evaluation System of Elderly-Friendliness in Urban Community Housing. (Tianjin University). [Google Scholar]
  16. Mei, W.-B., Hsu, C.-Y. & Ou, S.-J. (2020). Research on Evaluation Indexes and Weights of the Aging- Friendly Community Public Environment under the Community Home-based Pension Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 17, 2863. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Torku, A., Chan, A. P. C. & Yung, E. H. K. (2021). Age-friendly cities and communities: a review and future directions. Ageing Soc. 41, 2242–2279. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Saaty, T. L. (2005). Analytic Hierarchy Process. in Encyclopedia of Biostatistics (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.