Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 618, 2025
6th International Symposium on Architecture Research Frontiers and Ecological Environment (ARFEE 2024)
Article Number 03008
Number of page(s) 6
Section Ecological Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561803008
Published online 27 February 2025
  1. Sun, Q. Zhou, L. & Wang. B. (2023). Spatial simulation of composite flood disasters in coastal mega cities under the background of climate change. Journal of Earth Information Science, 25 (12): 2427-2438. [Google Scholar]
  2. Feng, G. (2023). Study on flood risk and insurance in Xunjiang Flood Protection Zone of the Pearl River Basin. Xi'an University of Technology. [Google Scholar]
  3. He, Y. Xu, F. & Yu, S. (2015). Preliminary Study on Composite Simulation Technology of Complex Dynamic Processes in the Pearl River Estuary .In: Collection of the 27th National Hydrodynamics Seminar (Volume II) Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. 2015:8. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, X. (2021).Study on the evolution characteristics, mechanism and planning intervention of urban water relations in the Pearl River Delta. South China University of Technology. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liao, W. Wu, Q. Luo, R. etc. (2017). Analysis and Evaluation of Mountain Floods in Xilin County. Guangdong Water Resources and Hydropower, 2017 (10): 1-4 [Google Scholar]
  6. Liao, W. Wu, Q. Luo, R. etc. (2018). Rationality analysis of flood calculation results for mountain flood disasters. Guangdong Water Resources and Hydropower, 2018 (03): 35-37. [Google Scholar]
  7. Song, L. Li, Q. Hu, X. etc. (2019). Parallel Computational Model for River Network Hydrodynamics Based on Finite Volume Method. Journal of Changjiang Academy of Sciences, 36 (05): 7-12 [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, D. Quan, J. Ma, J. etc. (2015). Simulating the Flow Movement of Complex River Network Open Channels Using Godunov Format. Journal of Applied Basic and Engineering Sciences, 23(06): 1088-1096 [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhu, D. Chen, Y. Wang, Z. etc. (2011) Numerical Model of Hydrodynamics in Complex River Networks. Progress in Water Science, 22 (02): 203-207 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hou, J. Liang, Q. Zhang, H. et al. (2015) An efficient unstructured MUSCL scheme for solving the 2D shallow water equations. Environmental Modelling & Software, 66:131-152 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yu, C. & Duan. J. (2014). Closure to “Two-dimensional depth-averaged finite volume model for unsteady turbulent flow. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 52(1): 599-611 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hou, J. Li, G.Y. Li, G.D. etc. (2018). Application research of efficient and high-precision hydrodynamic model in flood routing. Journal of Hydroelectric Power Generation, 37 (02): 96-107 [Google Scholar]
  13. Begnudelli, L., Sanders, B. F., & Bradford, S. F. (2008). Adaptive Godunov-based model for flood simulation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(6), 714-725. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dazzi, S., Vacondio, R., Dal Palù, A., & Mignosa, P. (2018). A local time stepping algorithm for GPU-accelerated 2D shallow water models. Advances in water resources, 111, 274-288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Song L. & Xu Z. (2019). Research progress on hydrological hydrodynamic coupling model of urban rainstorm waterlogging Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science Edition) (05), 581-587. [Google Scholar]
  16. Luo, Y. and Fan. (2013). The application of SWMM and MIKE11 coupling model in urban tidal river network. China Rural Water Conservancy and Hydropower, ( 03 ), 98-102. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jelesnianski, C. P. (1965). A numerical calculation of storm tides induced by a tropical storm im**ing on a continental shelf. Monthly Weather Review, 93(6), 343-358. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Duan, Y. & Qin, Z. (1997). Numerical study on the nonlinear interaction between astronomical tides and storm surges along the coast of Shanghai. Oceans and Lakes (01), 80-87 [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhou, X. & Sun, W. (2000). Nonlinear interaction between storm surges and astronomical tides in the waters outside the Yangtze River estuary. Journal of Qingdao Ocean University (Natural Science Edition) (02), 201-206. [Google Scholar]
  20. Luo, Z. Tan, C. Huang, B. etc. (2022). Sensitivity of storm surge to runoff in the the Pearl River Estuary: a case study of typhoon Shanzhu. Journal of Tropical Meteorology (04), 521-528. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ye, R. Qian Y., Kong J., etc. (2013). The establishment and verification of the storm surge mathematical model of the large system in the Pearl River Delta. People 's Yangtze River, (21), 76-80. [Google Scholar]
  22. Su, C. Chen, X. Tang, Y. etc. (2018). Analysis of the Impact of River Terrain Changes on Flood and Tide Water Surface Lines: A Case Study of the Northwest River Delta River Network. Hydrology (03), 13-20+28 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gu, L. Li, H. & Zheng, G. (2014). Study on the influence of estuary extension on river network dynamics in the Pearl River Delta China. Water Transport (Second Half) (12), 272-274+301 [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, W. Jie, H. & Song, L. (2020). Application of Integrated Flood Forecasting and Dispatch Model and System in Xizhi River Basin. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Academic Symposium on Urban Water Security and Water Management and the 4th Academic Symposium on Urban Flood Control and Drainage. 116-122. [Google Scholar]
  25. Feng, G. Huang, Q. Fang, etc. (2024). Flood risk assessment of Xunjiang Flood Protection Zone in the Pearl River Basin Journal of Changjiang Academy of Sciences (07), 79-86+93 [Google Scholar]
  26. Tian, Z. Liu, J. Zhang, W. etc. (2022). Application research of integrated technology for real-time flood forecasting and dispatching evolution in the Xizhi River Basin Guangdong Water Resources and Hydropower (11), 30-34 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.