EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 621 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 621 (2025) 01007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 621, 2025
Second International Conference on Green Energy, Environmental Engineering and Sustainable Technologies 2024 (ICGEST 2024)
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 8
Section Application of Sustainable Technology in Construction Industry
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562101007
Published online 19 March 2025
  1. A. Petrillo, I. Farina, M. Travaglioni, C. Salzano, S. Puca, A. Ramondo, R. Olivares, L. Cossentino, R. Ciffi, Opportunities and future challenges of geopolymer mortars for sustainable development, Handb. Sustain. Concr. Ind. Waste Manag, Elsevier. 661–686 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Colangelo, I. Farina, M. Travaglioni, C. Salzano, R. Cioffi, A. Petrillo, Eco-efficient industrial waste recycling for the manufacturing of fiber reinforced innovative geopolymer mortars: Integrated waste management and green product development through LCA, J. Clean. Prod. 312, 127777 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Wu, B. Lu, T. Bai, H. Wang, F. Du, Y. Zhang, L. Cai, C. Jiang, W. Wang, Geopolymer, green alkali activated cementitious material: Synthesis, applications and challenges, Constr. Build. Mater. 224 930–949 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Danish, T. Ozbakkaloglu, M. Mosaberpanah, M. Salim, M. Bayram, J. Yeon, K. Jafar, Sustainability benefits and commercialization challenges and strategies of geopolymer concrete: A review, J. Build. Eng. 58 105005, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Adesina, Recent advances in the concrete industry to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions, Environ. Chall. 1 100004 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Sambucci, A. Sibai, and M. Valente, Recent advances in geopolymer technology. A potential eco-friendly solution in the construction materials industry: A review, J. Compos. Sci. 5(4) 109 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Coppola, J. M. Tulliani, P. Antonaci, P. Palmero, Role of natural stone wastes and minerals in the alkali activation process: A review, Materials. 13(10) 2284 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Nana, I.K. Tchummegne, S. Tome, A. Adesina, T. Alomayri, R. Singla, R.C. Kaze, E. Kamseu, S. Kumar, C. Leonelli, Comparison of feldspar and meta-halloysite geopolymers by alkaline and acidic activation, Constr. Build. Mater. 424 135953 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Luhar, S. Luhar, A comprehensive review on fly ash-based geopolymer, J. Compos. Sci. 6(8) 219 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  10. B.B. Jindal, Feasibility study of ambient cured geopolymer concrete–A review, Adv. Concr. Constr. 6(4), 387 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Ng, U.J. Alengaram, L.S. Wong, K.H. Mo, M.Z. Jumaat, S. Ramesh, A review on microstructural study and compressive strength of geopolymer mortar, paste and concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 186 550–576 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  12. Z. Jwaida, A. Dulaimi, N. Mashaan, and M.A. Othuman Mydin, Geopolymers: The green alternative to traditional materials for engineering applications, Infrastructures. 8(6) 98 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Dong, M. Elchalakani, and A. Karrech, Development of high strength one-part geopolymer mortar using sodium metasilicate, Constr. Build. Mater. 236 117611 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Matsimbe, M. Dinka, D. Olukanni, I. Musonda, Geopolymer: A systematic review of methodologies, Materials, 15(19) 6852 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  15. H.U. Ahmed, A.A. Mohammed, S. Rafiq, A.S. Mohammed, A. Mosavi, N.H. Sor, S.M.A. Qaidi, Compressive strength of sustainable geopolymer concrete composites: a state-of-the-art review, Sustainability. 13(24) 13502 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Kamseu, V. Alzari, D. Nuvoli, D. Sanna, I. Lancellotti, A. Mariani, C. Leonelli, Dependence of the geopolymerization process and end-products to the nature of solid precursors: Challenge of the sustainability, J. Clean. Prod. 278 123587 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  17. K.S. Yeon, K.K. Kim, J. Yeon, H.J. Lee, Compressive and flexural strengths of EVA-modified mortars for 3D additive construction, Materials. 12(16) 2600 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  18. F.N. Okoye, J. Durgaprasad, N.B. Singh, Effect of silica fume on the mechanical properties of fly ash based-geopolymer concrete, Ceram. Int. 42(2) 3000 – 3006 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Alanazi, J. Hu, Y.-R. Kim, Effect of slag, silica fume, and metakaolin on properties and performance of alkali-activated fly ash cured at ambient temperature, Constr. Build. Mater. 197 747–756 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Kaur, J. Singh, M. Kaur, Compressive strength of rice husk ash based geopolymer: The effect of alkaline activator, Constr. Build. Mater. 169 188–192 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Uysal, M.M. Al-mashhadani, Y. Aygörmez, O. Canpolat, Effect of using colemanite waste and silica fume as partial replacement on the performance of metakaolin-based geopolymer mortars, Constr. Build. Mater. 176 271–282 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  22. F. Oshani, A. Allahverdi, A. Kargari, R. Norouzbeigi, N.M. Mahmoodi, Effect of preparation parameters on properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer activated by silica fume-sodium hydroxide alkaline blend, J. Build. Eng. 60 104984 (2022). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.