EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 621 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 621 (2025) 03003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 621, 2025
Second International Conference on Green Energy, Environmental Engineering and Sustainable Technologies 2024 (ICGEST 2024)
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 9
Section Sustainable Technology for Environmental Protection
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562103003
Published online 19 March 2025
  1. Yarlagadda, S.; Gude, V.G.; Camacho, L.M.; Pinappu, S.; Deng, S. Potable water recovery from As, U, and F contaminated ground waters by direct contact membrane distillation process. Journal of hazardous materials 2011, 192, 1388-1394, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.056. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sgroi, M.; Vagliasindi, F.G.; Roccaro, P.J.C.o.i.e.S.; Health. Feasibility, sustainability and circular economy concepts in water reuse. Current opinion in environmental Science Health 2018, 2, 20-25, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.01.004. [Google Scholar]
  3. Massoud, M.A.; Kazarian, A.; Alameddine, I.; Al-Hindi, M. Factors influencing the reuse of reclaimed water as a management option to augment water supplies. Environmental monitoring assessment 2018, 190, 1-11, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6905-y. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmadi, M.S.; Sušnik, J.; Veerbeek, W.; Zevenbergen, C. Towards a global day zero? Assessment of current and future water supply and demand in 12 rapidly developing megacities. Sustainable Cities Society 2020, 61, 102295, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102295. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, Z.; Wu, Q.; Wu, G.; Hu, H.-Y. Centralized water reuse system with multiple applications in urban areas: Lessons from China’s experience. Resources, Conservation Recycling 2017, 117, 125-136, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.008. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shareef, M.E.; Abdulrazzaq, D.G. River Flood Modelling For Flooding Risk Mitigation in Iraq. Civil Engineering Journal 2021, 7, 1702-1715, doi:Doi: 10.28991/cej-2021-03091754. [Google Scholar]
  7. Baggett, S.; Jeffrey, P.; Jefferson, B. Risk perception in participatory planning for water reuse. Desalination 2006, 187, 149-158, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.075. [Google Scholar]
  8. Friedler, E.; Lahav, O.; Jizhaki, H.; Lahav, T. Study of urban population attitudes towards various wastewater reuse options: Israel as a case study. Journal of environmental management 2006, 81, 360-370, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.11.013. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nancarrow, B.E.; Leviston, Z.; Po, M.; Porter, N.B.; Tucker, D.I. What drives communities’ decisions and behaviours in the reuse of wastewater. Water Science Technology 2008, 57, 485-491, doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.160. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dolnicar, S.; Hurlimann, A.; Grün, B. What affects public acceptance of recycled and desalinated water? Water research 2011, 45, 933-943, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.030. [Google Scholar]
  11. Garcia-Cuerva, L.; Berglund, E.Z.; Binder, A.R.J.R., Conservation. Public perceptions of water shortages, conservation behaviors, and support for water reuse in the US. Resources, Conservation Recycling 2016, 113, 106-115, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.006. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hurlimann, A.; Dolnicar, S. Public acceptance and perceptions of alternative water sources: a comparative study in nine locations. In Water Reuse Policies for Potable Use, Routledge: 2018; pp. 151-174. [Google Scholar]
  13. Okun, D. Water reuse introduces the need to integrate both water supply and wastewater management at local and regulatory levels. Water Science Technology 2002, 46, 273-280, doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0689. [Google Scholar]
  14. Po, M.; Nancarrow, B.E.; Kaercher, J.D. Literature review of factors influencing public perceptions of water reuse; CSIRO Land and Water Perth: 2003; Vol. 54. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ravishankar, C.; Nautiyal, S.; Seshaiah, M. Social acceptance for reclaimed water use: a case study in Bengaluru. Recycling 2018, 3, 4, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling3010004. [Google Scholar]
  16. Buyukkamaci, N.; Alkan, H.S. Public acceptance potential for reuse applications in Turkey. Resources, Conservation Recycling 2013, 80, 32-35, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.08.001. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, W.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, W.; Lyu, S.; Jiao, W. Perceptions of different stakeholders on reclaimed water reuse: the case of Beijing, China. Sustainability 2015, 7, 9696-9710, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su7079696. [Google Scholar]
  18. Salman, R.M.; Nashaat, M.R.; Sh, M.F. Estimating the Water Properties Which Effluent From Sewage Treatment Plants of Al-Kut Province Into the Tigris River, Iraq. European Academic Research 2017, 4, 10672-10687. [Google Scholar]
  19. Al-Ansari, N. Topography and climate of Iraq. Journal of Earth Sciences Geotechnical Engineering 2021, 11, 1-13. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sheina, S.; Muhsin, M.; Girya, L. Application technology solar thermal power plant in Al-Kut. In Proceedings of E3S Web of Conferences; p. 05019. [Google Scholar]
  21. Al-Neami, M.A.; Al-Rubaee, R.H.; Kareem, Z.J.o.C.E. Evaluation of pavement condition index for roads of Al-Kut city. International Journal of Current Engineering Technology 2017, 7, 1461-1467. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.