EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 621 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 621 (2025) 03016 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 621, 2025
Second International Conference on Green Energy, Environmental Engineering and Sustainable Technologies 2024 (ICGEST 2024)
Article Number 03016
Number of page(s) 11
Section Sustainable Technology for Environmental Protection
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562103016
Published online 19 March 2025
  1. B. Borah, B. Mech Das, “A review on applications of bio-products employed in drilling fluids to minimize environmental footprint”, Environmental Challenges, vol. 6, pp. 100411, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. D. S. Ibrahim, N. A. Sami, N. Balasubramanian, “Effect of barite and gas oil drilling fluid additives on the reservoir rock characteristics”, J. of Pet. Exploration and Production Technology, vol.7, pp.281-292, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Sonmez, K. M. Versan, R. Özel, “Performance analysis of drilling fluid liquid lubricants”, J Pet Sci Eng, vol. 108, pp.64–73, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. M. Salem, “Innovative Drilling Fluid Design Using Nano Materials”, Pet. Eng. Dept. Future University in Egypt, and Suez University, Egypt. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Zakaria, M. M. Husein, G. Harland, “Novel Nanoparticle Based Drilling Fluid with Improved Characteristics”, In SPE International Oilfield Nanotechnology Conference and Exhibition; Society of Petroleum Engineers, The Netherlands, June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Li, L. Yu, W. Liu, L. Cai, Y. Hu, “Toxicity Evaluation of Common Drilling Fluid Additives and Applicability Comparison of Marine Toxicity Test Organisms”, J Marine Sci Res Dev, vol. 9, pp. 270, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. J.F. Aslan, L.I. Weber, J. Iannacone, J. J. Lugon, V.B. Saraiva, M.M. Oliveira, “Toxicity of drilling fluids in aquatic organisms: a review”, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Contam., vol.14, pp. 35-47, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. X. Xie, G. C. Jiang, M. Chen, H. Deng, Y. Xu, “Study and Application of Green Throwing Drilling Fluid”, Pet. Sci. and Tech,m vol. 30, pp.443-452, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. E. B.Ekeinde, E. E. Okoro, A. Dosunmu, S. Iyuke, “Optimizing aqueous drilling mud system viscosity with green additives”, J. Pet. Expl. and Prod. Tech, vol. 9, pp. 315–318, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Ramasamy, K. A. Mohammad, “Sustainable and Green Drilling Fluid Additives Development, the Offshore Technology”, Conference Asia, Virtual and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, March 22–25, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Mohamed, S. Elkatatny, A. Al-Majed, “Removal of Calcium Carbonate Water-Based Filter Cake Using a Green Biodegradable Acid”, Sustainability, vol. 12, pp. 994, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  12. J.A Sampey,” Sugar cane additive for filtration control in well working compositions”, US Patent 7094737B1, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. F.X. Li, G.C. Jiang, Z.K. Wang, M.R. Cui, “Drilling fluid from natural vegetable gum”, Pet. Sci. Technol, vol., 32, pp. 738–744, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Wajheeuddin, M. E. Hossain, “Development of an Environmentally-Friendly Water-Based Mud System Using Natural Materials”, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 43, pp.2501–2513, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. M. Sharif, N.V. Nagalakshmi, R. S. Srigowri, G. Vasanth, U. K. Sankar, “Drilling Waste Management and Control the Effects”, Journal of Advanced J Chemical Engineering, vol. 7, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Seyedmohammadi, “The effects of drilling fluids and environment protection from pollutants using some models”, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, vol. 3, pp. 23, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. J.I. Ellis, G. Fraser, J. Russell, “Discharged drilling waste from oil and gas platforms and its effects on benthic communities”, Mar Ecol Prog Ser, vol. 456, pp. 285–352, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Siddique, L. Kwoffie, K. Addae-Afoakwa, K. Yates, J. Njuguna, “Oil Based Drilling Fluid Waste: An Overview on Environmentally Persistent Pollutants”, OP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 195, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Chenu, C.H. Pons, M. Robert, “Interaction of kaolinite and montmorillonite with neutral polysaccharides”, Proceedings of International Clay Conference, Denver, Indiana, USA, 375-381, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  20. I. M. Magzoub, A. H. Ibnelwaleed, S. N. Mustafa, M. Mahmoud, S. S. Abdullah, A. Benamor, “An Investigation of the Swelling Kinetics of Bentonite Systems Using Particle Size Analysis”, J. Dispersion Science and Technology, vol.41, pp. 817-827, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  21. B. A. Hamad, M. He, X. Mingbiao, W. Liu, M. Mpelwa, S. Tang, L. Jin, J. Song, “A Novel Amphoteric Polymer as a Rheology Enhancer and Fluid-Loss Control Agent for Water-Based Drilling Muds at Elevated Temperatures”, ACS Omega, vol. 5, pp. 8483−8495, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Wang, H. Du, “Rheological Properties of KCL/Polymer Type Drilling Fluids Containing Particulate Loss Prevention Material”, Appl. Rheol., vol. 28, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. H. J. Skadsem, A. Leulseged, E. Cayeux, “Measurement of Drilling Fluid Rheology and Modeling of Thixotropic Behavior”, Applied Rheology, vol. 29, pp. 1-11, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. W. sniowski, K. Skrzypaszek, T. Małachowski, “Selection of a Suitable Rheological Model for Drilling Fluid Using Applied Numerical Methods”, Energies, vol. 13, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. M.V. Kok, “Determination of rheological models for drilling fluids (a statistical approach)”, Energy Sources, vol. 26, pp. 153 – 165, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  26. American Petroleum Institute RP13B1, Recommended Practice for Field Testing Water-Based Drilling Fluids, American Petroleum Institute, Bellevue, USA, 3rd edition, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  27. O. Mark, “Statistical characterization of performance of biopolymer drill-in fluid for different rheological models”, Msc thesis, African university of science and technology, Abuja, Nigeria, 2010. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.