Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 623, 2025
IV International Conference on Ensuring Sustainable Development: Ecology, Earth Science, Energy and Agriculture (AEES2024)
Article Number 03006
Number of page(s) 7
Section Problems of the Energy Complex
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562303006
Published online 08 April 2025
  1. O.E. Nikonets, K.A. Popova, Green finance and ESG transformation of the economy. Management accounting, 2-3, 528–538 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Van den Heede, N. De Belie, Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’ concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations. Cem. Concr. Compos, 34, 431–442 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Habert, J.B.D. de Lacaillerie, N. Roussel, An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends. J. Clean. Prod., 19, 1229–1238 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. I.V. Shadrunova, E.V. Zelinskaya, N.N. Orekhova, O.E. Gorlova, T.V. Chekushina, ESG-transformation in processing of man-made mineral raw materials. Mining industry, 1, 71–78 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Bhutta, M. Farooq, C. Zanotti, N. Banthia, Pull-out behavior of different fibers in geopolymer mortars: effects of alkaline solution concentration and curing. Mater. Struct., 50 (1), 1–13 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Lazarre, K. Guidedi, S. Amaria, Kolyang Modular ontology design: a state-of-art of diseases ontology modeling and possible issue. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, 3 (36), 497–501 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. B.I.A. Alves, M.T. Marvila, J.A.T.L. Júnior, C.M.F. Vieira, J. Alexandre, A.R. Garcez de Azevedo, Alkaline activation of binders: a comparative study. Materials, 17 (3), 667 (2024) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Tammam, M. Uysal, O. Canpolat, Effects of alternative ecological fillers on the mechanical, durability, and microstructure of fly ash-based geopolymer mortar. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng., 26, 5877–5900 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  9. N.I. Shestakov, K.L. Chertes, E.V. Tkach, Comparative analysis of biopositiveness of design solutions of objects of the road and transport complex. Biosphere compatibility: man, region, technology, 3 (39), 106–120 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Rakhimova, G. Slavcheva, M. Aisanova, M. Rakhimov, E. Tkach, The influence of a complex additive on the strength characteristics of concrete for road construction. International Journal of GEOMATE, 25 (110), 243–250 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. V.A.R. Bernard, S.M. Renuka, S. Avudaiappan, C. Umarani, M. Amran, P. Guindos, R. Fediuk, N.I. Vatin, Performance investigation of the incorporation of ground granulated blast furnace slag with fly ash in autoclaved aerated concrete. Crystals, 12 (8), 1024 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Torres-Carrasco, F. Puertas, Alkaline activation of different aluminosilicates as an alternative to Portland cement: Alkali activated cements or geopolymers. Rev. Ing. Constr., 32, 5–12 (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.