Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 625, 2025
5th International Conference on Environment Resources and Energy Engineering (ICEREE 2025)
Article Number 01015
Number of page(s) 5
Section Energy Transition and Low Carbon Technology Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562501015
Published online 17 April 2025
  1. IPHE, IEA, and Center on Global Energy Policy. (2024). Hydrogen Strategies and Roadmaps. https://www.iphe.net/partners. [Google Scholar]
  2. Moral, G., Ortiz-Imedio, R., Ortiz, A., Gorri, D., Ortiz, I. (2022). Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative Analysis of Technical Alternatives. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. American Chemical Society, 61, 6106–6124. [Google Scholar]
  3. Razzaq, R., Li, C., Zhang, S. (2013). Coke oven gas: Availability, properties, purification, and utilization in China. Fuel. 113, 287–299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. ISO. (2018). ISO 14064-1:2018 Greenhouse gases Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66453.html [Google Scholar]
  5. ISO. (2018).ISO 14067:2018 Greenhouse gases — Carbon footprint of products — Requirements and guidelines for quantification (1st ed.). ISO (the International Organization for Standardization). [Google Scholar]
  6. IPCC. (2023). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. [Google Scholar]
  7. China Hydrogen Alliance. (2020). Standard and Evaluation of Low-Carbon Hydrogen, Clean Hydrogen and Renewable Hydrogen: T/CAB 0078- 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., Weidema, B. (2016). The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21, 1218–1230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Jianping, H., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.- F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., Hua, Z. (2013). Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Google Scholar]
  10. IPHE. (2023). Methodology for Determining the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with the Production of Hydrogen. IPHE. [Google Scholar]
  11. TÜV. (2021). TÜV SÜD Standard CMS 70 Production of green hydrogen (GreenHydrogen). TÜV. German. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ji, C., Hui, W., Zhao, H., Zhou, Q., Yu, Y. (2024). Analysis on carbon dioxide emission in hydrogen production from coke oven gas. Modern Chemical Industry. 44, 224–227. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang, Y., Tian, Z., Chen, X., Xu, X. (2022). Technology-environment-economy assessment of high-quality utilization routes for coke oven gas. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 47, 666–685. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, J., Ma, X., Liu, H., Zhang, X. (2018). Life cycle assessment and economic analysis of methanol production from coke oven gas compared with coal and natural gas routes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 299–308. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Di, Z., Lei, F., Jing, J., Peng, H., Lu, X., Cheng, F. (2024). Technical alternatives for coke oven gas utilization in China: A comparative analysis of environment-economic-strategic perspectives. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 21, 100395. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.