Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 628, 2025
2025 7th International Conference on Environmental Prevention and Pollution Control Technologies (EPPCT 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02009 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Exploration of Dynamic Changes in Environmental Ecosystems and Protection Strategies | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562802009 | |
| Published online | 16 May 2025 | |
- Armbrust, E. V. (2009). The life of diatoms in the world’s oceans. Nature, 459(7244), 185–192. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smol, J. P., & Stoermer, E. F. (2010). The diatoms: Applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wu, N., Faber, C., & Qu, Y. (2020). Diatom-based bioassessment in China: Progress under the Water Framework Directive. Ecological Indicators, 118, 106701. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H., Zhang, R., & Chen, J. (2023). Diatom community responses to microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Pollution, 316, 120682. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Piredda, R., et al. (2021). Diatom DNA metabarcoding for water quality assessment: A comparative analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources, 21(3), 789–805. [Google Scholar]
- Pollanen, M. S., & Chiasson, D. A. (1996). The role of diatoms in the diagnosis of drowning: a critical review. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 41(3), 413–420. [Google Scholar]
- Nécrot, N., & Giroud, C. (2019). Diatoms in drowning: a review. Forensic Science International, 299, 1–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, X., et al. (2021). Application of diatom analysis in forensic identification of drowning cases in different water environments. Forensic Science Review, 33(2), 135–148. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y., et al. (2020). Advances in molecular techniques for diatom identification in forensic science. Forensic Science Research, 5(4), 267–274. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C., Hu, S., Wen, J., et al. (2019). Technical Specification for Diatom Examination in Forensic Science: Microwave Digestion-Vacuum Filtration-Microscopy Method (GA/T 1662-2019). [Google Scholar]
- Rimet, F., et al. (2019). Diatom-based assessment of river ecological status: A review. Ecological Indicators, 99, 172–185. [Google Scholar]
- European Parliament. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC: Water Framework Directive. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y., et al. (2023). Diatom-based pollution tracking in urban watersheds. Science of the Total Environment, 856, 159112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lavoie, I., et al. (2020). Diatom-based indices for monitoring water quality. Water Research, 168, 115160. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- B-Béres, V., et al. (2022). Diatom functional traits in biomonitoring: A meta-analysis. Ecological Indicators, 135, 108567. [Google Scholar]
- Saros, J. E., et al. (2021). Climate-driven shifts in diatom assemblages. Limnology and Oceanography, 66(4), 1234–1245. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L., et al. (2023). Microplastic interactions with freshwater diatoms. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(8), 3201–3210. [Google Scholar]
- Stevenson, R. J., et al. (2019). Freshwater Algae of North America. Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J., et al. (2021). Diatom biodiversity patterns in subtropical rivers. Hydrobiologia, 848, 4567–4581. [Google Scholar]
- Gibson, C. E., et al. (2022). Diatom community dynamics in temperate lakes. Freshwater Biology, 67(3), 512–525. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, X., et al. (2022). Forensic implications of diatom size in drowning cases. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 67(5), 1892–1901. [Google Scholar]
- Spaulding, S. A., Jewson, D. H., Bixby, R. J., et al. (2012). Automated measurement of diatom size. Limnology and Oceanography Methods, 10(11), 882–890. DOI: 10.4319/lom.2012.10.882. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.