Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 629, 2025
2025 15th International Conference on Future Environment and Energy (ICFEE 2025)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 9
Section Carbon Emission Reduction and Policy Implementation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562903001
Published online 05 June 2025
  1. K.S. Rogge, F. Kern, M. Howlett, Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transitions, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 33 (2017), pp. 1–10 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. F.W. Geels, Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31 (8–9) (2002), pp. 1257–1274 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Fouquet, The slow search for solutions: lessons from historical energy transitions by sector and service, Energy Policy, 38 (11) (2010), pp. 6586–6596 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Stern & A. Valero, Innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions, Research Policy, Elsevier, 50(9) (2021) [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Guerría From negotiations to implementation: strengthening global responses to climate change UNFCCC (Ed.), G7 Climate Change: The New Economy. World News CLIMATE CHANGE, The New Economy, London, (2016) pp. 34–37 [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Barbhuiya, B.B. Das, and D. Adak, Roadmap to a net-zero carbon cement sector: Strategies, innovations and policy imperatives. Journal of Environmental Management. 359 (Art. 121052) (2024) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Barbhuiya, F. Kanavaris, B.B. Das, and M. Idrees, Decarbonising cement and concrete production: Strategies, challenges and pathways for sustainable development, Journal of Building Engineering, 86, (2024) pp. 2352–7102 [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Egenhofer, and M. Alessi and A. Georgiev and N. Fujiwara, The EU Emissions Trading System and Climate Policy Towards 2050: Real Incentives to Reduce Emissions and Drive Innovation?, CEPS Special Reports, (2011) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. A. Pirog, Data Will Drive Innovation In Public Policy And Management Research In The Next Decade. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(2), (2014), pp. 537–543 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Galloway, Driving Innovation: A Case for Targeted Competition Policy in Dynamic Markets, World Competition, Issue, 34(1), (2011) pp. 73–96 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. E. S. Gironés, R. van Est, G. Verbong, The role of policy entrepreneurs in defining directions of innovation policy: A case study of automated driving in the Netherlands, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Schot, & W. E. Steinmueller, Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change, Research Policy, 47(9), (2018), pp. 1554–1567 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. K. S. Rogge, and J. Schleich, Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany, Research Policy, 47(9), (2018) pp. 1639–1654 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Bergek, and C. Berggren, The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: a review of energy and automotive industry studies Ecol. Econ., 106 (2014), pp. 112–123 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Díaz-García, A. González-Moreno, F.J. Sáez-Martínez, Eco-innovation: insights from a literature review Innov.: Manag. Policy Pract., 17(1) (2015), pp. 6–23 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. OECD, Better Policies to Support Eco-Innovation. OECD Studies on Environmental Innovation. Paris (2011) [Google Scholar]
  17. G.F. Nemet, M. Jakob, J.C. Steckel, O. Edenhofer, Addressing policy credibility problems for low-carbon investment. Global Environmental Change, 42, (2017), pp. 47–57 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Scotch Whisky Economic Impact Report (2024), Accessed (Oct 2024) https://www.scotch-whisky.org.uk/media/2170/scotch-whisky-economic-impact-report-2024.pdf [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Ali and S. Markkanen Cement sector deep dive: How could demand drive low carbon innovation in the cement industry. Cambridge: Cambridge, Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL) (2023), Accessed (Oct 2024) https://www.cisl.cam.ac.uk/files/sectoral_case_study_cement.pdf [Google Scholar]
  20. Green Distilleries Competition, United Kingdom Government site, Accessed Oct (2024) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/green-distilleries-competition [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Unruh, Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28, (2000), pp. 817–830 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Auld, A. Mallett, B. Burlica, F. Nolan-Poupart, R. Slater, Evaluating the effects of policy innovations: Lessons from a systematic review of policies promoting low-carbon technology, Global Environmental Change, 29, (2014), pp. 444–458 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Pacala, R. Socolow, Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies, Science, 305 (2004), pp. 968–972 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.