EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 630 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 630 (2025) 02003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 630, 2025
2025 International Conference on Eco-environmental Protection, Environmental Monitoring and Remediation (EPEMR 2025)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 10
Section Ecosystem Resilience and Sustainable Futures under Climate Change
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202563002003
Published online 22 May 2025
  1. Zhang T, Peng J, Liang W, et al. Spatial-temporal patterns of water use efficiency and climate controls in China's Loess Plateau during 2000-2010[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 565: 105-122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang J, Yang L P, Gong E J, et al. Dynamic monitoring of eco-environmental quality in Xi'an based on GEE and adjusted RSEI[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(5): 2114-2127. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang X, Zhao X, Zhang Z, et al. Assessment of soil erosion change and its relationships with landuse/cover change in China from the end of the 1980s to 2010[J]. Catena, 2016, 137:256-268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Li H S, Wang L J, Zhang Z Q, et al. Theoretical thought and practice of eco-environment synergistic management in the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2021, 11:409-417. [Google Scholar]
  5. Xu Y, Zhou Q H, Dou S Q, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics of vegetation net primary productivity in Yangtze River Basinbased on ZGS and Thornthwaite Memorial models[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 42(1):225-232. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ouyang Z Y, Wang Q, Zheng H, et al. National ecosystem survey and assessment of China (2000— 2010) [J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2014, 29(4):462-466. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu R, Sun S, Ju L, et al. Evolutionary characteristics and spatiotemporal trend of meteorological drought in the HuangHuai-hai Plain[J]. 'Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering ('Transactions of the CSAE), 2023, 39(19): 8592. [Google Scholar]
  8. Deng J S, Li Z M, Chen S S, et al. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of drought in Panxi region based on TVDI [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2024, 42(01):252-260+269. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fu K X, Jia G D, Yu X X, et al. Ecological Environment Assessment and Driving Mechanism Analysis of Nagqu and Amdo Sections of Qinghai-Xizang Highway Based on Improved Remote Sensing Ecological Index[J]. Environmental Science, 2024, 45(3): 1586-1597. [Google Scholar]
  10. Xu H Q. A remote sensing index for assessment of regional ecological changes[J]. China Environmental Science, 2013, 33(05):889-897. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zheng Z, Wu Z, Chen Y, et al. Instability of remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI) and its improvement for time series analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 152595. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang L X, Zhao R, Liu Z, et al. Monitoring and prediction of ecological environmental quality in the YanheRiver Basin based on the remote sensing ecological index[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2022, 39(03):943-954. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang S W, Wu W. Spatiotemporal Variation of Ecological Environmental Quality and Its Response to Different Driving Factors in Jialing River Basin in Recent 31 Years[J]. Research of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 31(1):427-439. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yu H J, Zhang F M, Ma H, et al. Spatio-temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Ecological Environment Quality in the Huai River Basin Based on RSEI[J]. Environmental Science, 2024, 45(07):4112-4121. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yang X, Meng F, Fu P, et al. Spatiotemporal change and driving factors of the eco-environment quality in the Yangtze River Basin from 2001 to 2019[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 131:108214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li X Y, Yue C F, Wang Q J, et al. Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Factors of Ecological Environment Quality in MayiLake Nature Reserve [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2024, 39(01):19-27. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yang M Q, Zhu L, Wang R, et al. Spatiotemporal variation and climate responsiveness of NDVI in Liaohe River Basin[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 1-15. [Google Scholar]
  18. Willis K S. Remote sensing change detection for ecological monitoring in United States protected areas[J]. Biological Conservation, 2015, 182:233-242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Qin G X, Meng Z Y, Fu Y. Drought and water-use efficiency are dominant environmental factors affecting greenness in the Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 834:155479. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang W, Du P J, Guo S C, et al. Enhanced remote sensing ecological index andecological environment evaluation in arid area[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2023, 27(2) :299-317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Qin G X, Meng Z Y, Fu Y. Drought and water-use efficiency are dominant environmental factors affecting greenness in the Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 834:155479. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang J F, Xu C D. Geodetector: Principle and prospective [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(01):116-134. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen X. The study on the Circular Economy Developing Model in Pingliang City[D]. Lanzhou University, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  24. Xu C X, Wan H L, He R N, et al. Research on spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of urban agglomeration vulnerability in Guanzhong Plain [J]. Journal Of Desert Research, 2023, 43(06):111-120. [Google Scholar]
  25. Luo Y Z, Huang Y C, Wang T. Spatial-temporal Variation Characteristics of Ecological Environment Quality and Their Driving Forces in Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration, China[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2023, 45(6): 1316-1329. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lu Y, Zhang Q, Li X H, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of vegetation coverage and its response to climate factors in Gansu section of Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(2):232-238. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang H, Wang A M, Zhao J L, et al. Practice and exploration of ecological protection and restoration of mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes, grasslands and plateaus: A case study of Pingliang City[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2024, (07):13-18. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhu R, Ao Z J, Jiang Y Y. Assessment of ecological environment vulnerability in Tianshui city based on the CRITIC objective weighting method[J]. Journal Of Desert Research, 2024, 44(03):321-331. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yan L L, Zhang Q, Fu X D. Evaluation and Development Path of Ecological Environmental Ouality Situation in Dingxi City. [J]. Journal of Green Science and Technology, 2022, 24(22):189-192+198. [Google Scholar]
  30. Xue L, Liu Q. Spatiotemporal Varation of Ecological Environmental Quality and Its Response to Different riving Factors in the section of Yellow River Basin in Recent 3l Years[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 31(1):373-384. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gu Q, Gieng G P, Zheng R L, et al. Analysis on Spatiotemporal Varation of soil Moisture and its infuencing Factors in Weihe Rive Basin[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 31(5):199-211. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gao H L, Zhang T L, Fan H Y, et al. Quantitative Analysis of the Factors Affecting Ecological Environment Quality in Yangling Demonstration Zone Based on Geographical Detector[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2020, 35(05):185-194. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nirwan N, Kanagavel K, Siddiqui A. Identifying the impact of urban development on abutting ecology in Chandigarh using remote sensing based ecological index [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2024, (prepublish):1-33. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.