Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 632, 2025
The 5th Edition of Oriental Days for the Environment “Green Lab. Solution for Sustainable Development” (JOE5)
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 7
Section Natural Resources, Earth & Environmental Studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202563201010
Published online 03 June 2025
  1. J. Margat, Methodologie, hydrogeologie, cartographie, vulnerabilité Nappe, Vulnerabilité, Propriété (1968). [Google Scholar]
  2. A. A. Nadiri, Evaluation of multiple aquifer vulnerability using DRASTIC, SINTACS methods (2020). [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Abdullah, S. Ali, N. Al-Ansari, S. Knutsson, Groundwater vulnerability using DRASTIC and COP models: Case study of Halabja Saidsadiq Basin Iraq. Engineering, 08(11), 741–760 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4236/ eng.2016.811067 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M.Civita, Le Carte Della VulnerabilitaDegli Acquif- eri All Inquinamento: Teoria e Pratica; Pitagora Editrice: Bologna, Italy. 325–333 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Aller, T. Bennett, J.H. R. Lehr, H. Petty, G. Hackett, DRASTIC: A standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic setting. USEPA Report 600/2– 87/035, Robert S. Kerr Envi- ronmental Research Laboratory, Ada, 252 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  6. W. S. H. Al-Qurnawi, Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment and Wellhead Protection Zones of Alton Kopry Basin, Kirkuk Governorate Northeast of Iraq. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Basrah, Iraq (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Ben Abbou, Degradation of water quality in the alluvial aquifer of Wadi Larbaa by waste from the city of Taza (Morocco). Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res., 10(2), 282–294 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Kassou, et al., Assessment of the vulnerability to pollution of the water table of the Fes-Taza corridor by the DRASTIC method using GIS (2016). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Singh, S. K. Srivastav, S. Kumar, G. J. Chakrapani, A modified-DRASTIC model (DRASTICA) for assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution in an urbanized environment in Lucknow, India. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74, 5475–5490 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4558-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. C. Vidal, Une interprétation nouvelle des nappes du Prérif central (Maroc) et ses conséquences sur la structure de leur substratum autochtone. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris, Série D, 272, 24–27 (1971). [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Cirac, Le bassin sud-rifain occidental au Néogène supérieur: Évolution de la dynamique sédimentaire et de la paléogéographie au cours d'une phase de comblement. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Bordeaux I, France, 285p, (1985). [Google Scholar]
  12. F. L. Rauf, S. S. Ali, Groundwater Vulnerability of Halabja-Khurmal Sub-Basin Using Modified DRASTIC Method. Water, Air, & Soil Poll., 233(4), 1–18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05903-3 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Chatterjee, M. Raziuddin, Determination of water quality index (WQI) of a degraded river in Asansol Industrial Area, Raniganj, Burdwan, West Bengal. Nat. Environ. Poll. Technol., 1(2), 181–189 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Secunda, M. Collin, A. J. Melloul, Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive land use in Israel’s Sharon region. J. Environ. Manage., 54(1), 39–57 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1998.0213 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Ourarhi, M. Kadiri, A-E. Barkaoui, H. Bouiss, I. Amar, Y. Zarhloule, Assessment of risk intensity in the triffa plain aquifer: integration of hazard quantification, land use analysis, dynamic vulnerability GCITF, and DRASTIC method. Groundw. Sustain. Dev., 26, 101291(2024a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101291 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.