Open Access
Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 637, 2025
2025 International Conference on Environmental Monitoring and Ecological Restoration (EMER 2025)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01010 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Ecological Restoration Technology and Practice Research | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202563701010 | |
Published online | 16 July 2025 |
- Ahmed Z, Asghar M M, Malik M N, et al. Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China[J]. Resources Policy, 2020, 67: 101677. [Google Scholar]
- Hernández‐Blanco M, Costanza R, Chen H, et al. Ecosystem health, ecosystem services, and the well‐ being of humans and the rest of nature[J]. Global change biology, 2022, 28(17): 5027-5040. [Google Scholar]
- Li J, Xie B, Dong H, et al. The impact of urbanization on ecosystem services: Both time and space are important to identify driving forces[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2023, 347: 119161. [Google Scholar]
- Ching F, Liu X M. An analysis of the new urbanization’s ecological driving factor on the environment: based on the LMDI method[J]. Maejo International Journal of Energy and Environmental Communication, 2021, 3(3): 56-63. [Google Scholar]
- Yu D, Shi P, Liu Y, et al. Detecting land use-water quality relationships from the viewpoint of ecological restoration in an urban area[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 53: 205-216. [Google Scholar]
- Yao X, Kou D, Shao S, et al. Can urbanization process and carbon emission abatement be harmonious? New evidence from China[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2018, 71: 70-83. [Google Scholar]
- Nicholls S, Kim J. Spatial is special: The need to consider spatial effects in leisure research[J]. Leisure Sciences, 2022, 44(4): 476-496. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhang Y, et al. On the spatial relationship between ecosystem services and urbanization: A case study in Wuhan, China[J]. Science of the total environment, 2018, 637: 780-790. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao R, Lin M, Fei X, et al. Exploring the interactive coercing relationship between urbanization and ecosystem service value in the Shanghai–Hangzhou Bay Metropolitan Region[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 253: 119803. [Google Scholar]
- Ji J, Tang Z, Zhang W, et al. Spatiotemporal and multiscale analysis of the coupling coordination degree between economic development equality and eco-environmental quality in China from 2001 to 2020[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(3): 737. [Google Scholar]
- García-Nieto A P, Geijzendorffer I R, Baró F, et al. Impacts of urbanization around Mediterranean cities: Changes in ecosystem service supply[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 91: 589-606. [Google Scholar]
- Balzan M V, Caruana J, Zammit A. Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state[J]. Land use policy, 2018, 75: 711-725. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu Z, Fu W, Liu Q. Correlation between urbanization and ecosystem services in Xiamen, China[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23(1): 101-121. [Google Scholar]
- Tian Y, Zhou D, Jiang G. Conflict or Coordination? Multiscale assessment of the spatio-temporal coupling relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services: The case of the Jingjinji Region, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 117: 106543. [Google Scholar]
- Shi L, Halik Ü, Mamat Z, et al. Spatiotemporal investigation of the interactive coercing relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services in arid northwestern China[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2021, 32(14): 4105-4120. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang B, Li W, Xie G. Ecosystem services research in China: Progress and perspective[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(7): 1389-1395. [Google Scholar]
- Costanza R, d'Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S, Wang Y, Xu W, et al. Analysis of spatial and temporal variability of ecosystem service values and their spatial correlation in Xinjiang, China[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(19): 4861. [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y, Zhang X, Fang G, et al. Potential risks and challenges of climate change in the arid region of northwestern China[J]. Regional Sustainability, 2020, 1(1): 20-30. [Google Scholar]
- Cantero R, Katsri W. Transformation and Upgrading Path of Animal Husbandry Industry Based on Dynamic Shift Share Model[J]. 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Wang S, Xue J, Zhang Z, et al. An adaptive cycle resilience perspective to understand the regime shifts of social-ecological system interactions over the past two millennia in the Tarim River Basin[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(14). [Google Scholar]
- Jin J, Yin S, Yin H, et al. Eco–environmental effects of “production–living–ecological” space land use changes and recommendations for ecological restoration: A case study of the Weibei dryland in Shaanxi Province[J]. Land, 2023, 12(5): 1060. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng J, Zhou T, Tan E, et al. Evaluate the differences in carbon sink contribution of different ecological engineering projects[J]. Carbon Research, 2024, 3(1): 10. [Google Scholar]
- Pukowiec-Kurda K. The main processes responsible for landscape transformation in post-industrial urban areas in Central Europe[J]. Landscape Online, 2023: 1116-1116. [Google Scholar]
- Marcinkevičiūtė L, Vilkevičiūtė J, Žukovskis J. Legal and Managerial solutions of Public Sector Authorities for preserving ecosystem services of the lakes[J]. RESEARCH FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 35. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z, Xia F, Yang D, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics in ecosystem service value and its interaction with human activities in Xinjiang, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 110: 105826. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.