EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 641 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 641 (2025) 01013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 641, 2025
The 17th International Scientific Conference of Civil and Environmental Engineering for the PhD. Students and Young Scientists – Young Scientist 2025 (YS25)
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 12
Section Civil Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564101013
Published online 12 August 2025
  1. F. Niedermeier, G. Lovasz and H. de Meer, Chapter Three – Quantifying IT Energy Efficiency, Advanced in Computers 87, pp. 55-87 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-396528-8.00003-1. [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Dincer and Y. Bicer, Chapter 2 – Fundamentals of energy systems, Integrated Energy Systems for Multigeneration, pp. 33-83 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809943-8.00002-9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cambridge Dictionary, Efficiency. Cambridge University Press. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/efficiency. Accessed on 23.7.2024. [Google Scholar]
  4. Oxford Learner's Dictionaries, Efficiency. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/efficiency. Accessed on 23.7.2024. [Google Scholar]
  5. S.S. Martins, A.C.J. Evangelista, A.W.A. Hammad, V.W.Y. Tam and A. Haddad, Evaluation of 4D BIM tools applicability in construction planning efficiency, International Journal of Construction Management 22, pp. 2987-3000 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1837718. [Google Scholar]
  6. E.F. Xiao and C.J. Qi, Model Construction of Efficiency Evaluation of Family Farms by DEA, Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics 18, pp. 307-320 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2015.1040658. [Google Scholar]
  7. I.M. Horta, A.S. camanho, T.G. Dias and S. Niza, The Assessment of Municipal Services: Environmental Efficiency of Buildings Construction, Exploring Services Science 247, pp- 237-250 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32689-4_18. [Google Scholar]
  8. Green Policy Platform, Global status report: Buildings and construction 2024. https://www.greenpolicyplatform.org/research/global-status-report-buildings-and-construction-2024. Accessed on 24.7.2024. [Google Scholar]
  9. CTBUH, Explore data on skyscrapers and tall buildings. The Skyscraper Center. https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/explore-data. Accessed on 24.7.2024. [Google Scholar]
  10. World Population Review, Skyscrapers by country. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/skyscrapers-by-country. Accessed on 24.7.2024. [Google Scholar]
  11. UNESCO, UNESCO official website. https://www.unesco.org/en. Accessed on 24.7.2024. [Google Scholar]
  12. UNESCO, World Heritage List. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/?&mode=list. Accessed on 24.7.2024. [Google Scholar]
  13. P.A. Jensen, E. Maslesa, J.B. Berg and C. Thuesen, 10 questions concerning sustainable building renovation, Buildings and Environment 143, pp. 130-137 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.051. [Google Scholar]
  14. United Nations, Institutional frameworks and international cooperation for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/institutionalframeworks-international-cooperation. Accessed on 24.7.2024. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Risholt, B. Time and A.G. Hestnes, Sustainability assessment of nearly zero energy renovation of dwellings based on energy, economy and home quality indicators, Energy and Buildings 60, pp. 217-224 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.12.017. [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Rezgui, S. Hamini and A. Ramdani, Sustainable Renovation through Modular semantic prefabrication, IEEE (2022). 10.1109/ICE/ITMC-IAMOT55089.2022.10033157. [Google Scholar]
  17. Institute for Sustainability, Low carbon domestic retrofit guides. https://www.instituteforsustainability.co.uk/retrofitguides.html. Accessed on 24.7.2024. [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Meijer, A. Straub and E. Mlecnik, Consultancy Centres and Pop-Ups as Local Authority Policy Instruments to Stimulate Adoption of Energy Efficiency by Homeowners, Sustainability 10 (8), 2734 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082734. [Google Scholar]
  19. L.F. Cabeza, L. Rincon, V. Vilarino, G. Perez and A. Castell, Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29, pp. 394-416 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Passer, C. Ouellet-Plamondon, P. Kenneally, V. John and G. Habert, The impact of future scenarios on building refurbishment strategies towards plus energy buildings, Energy and Buildings 124, pp. 153-163 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.008. [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Nemry et al., Options to reduce the environmental impacts of residential buildings in the European Union – Potential and costs, Energy and Buildings 42 (7), pp.9763-984 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.01.009. [Google Scholar]
  22. G.A. Blengini and T. Di Carlo, Energy-savings policies and low-energy residential buildings: An LCA case study to support decision makers in piedmont (Italy), International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15 (7), pp. 652-665 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0190-5. [Google Scholar]
  23. O. Pons and A. Aguado, Integrated value model for sustainable assessment applied to technologies used to build schools in Catalonia, Spani, building and Environment 53, pp. 49-58 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.007. [Google Scholar]
  24. K. Mjornell, A. Boss, M. Lindahl and S. Molnar, A tool to evaluate different renovation alternatives with regard to sustainability, Sustainability 6 (7), pp. 4227-4245 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/su6074227. [Google Scholar]
  25. Y.Ch. Huang et al., Building users perceptions of importance of indoor environmental quality in long-term care facilities, Building and Environment 67, pp. 224-230 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.05.004. [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Teng, W. Wang, X. Mu and Ch. Xu, Assessing energy efficiency of green measures for residential buildings: the simulation case of the Changchun city in China, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 36, pp. 1103-1117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09793-x. [Google Scholar]
  27. M.A. Calvo-Serrano et al., The Church Tower of Santiago Apostol in Montilla: An Eco-Sustainable Rehabilitation Proposal, Sustainability 12 (17), 7104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177104. [Google Scholar]
  28. R. Moschetti, H. Brattebo, K. Stenerud Skeie and A. Gunnarshaug Lien, Performing quantitative analyses towards sustainable business models in building energy renovation projects: Analytic process and case study, Journal of Cleaner Production 199, pp. 1092-1106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.091. [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Femenias, K. Mjornell and L. Thuvander, Rethinking deep renovation: The perspective of rental housing in Sweden, Journal of Cleaner Production 195, pp. 1457-1467 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.282. [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Rudisser, G. Leitinger and U. Schirpke, Application of the Ecosystem Service Concept in Social-Ecological Systems – from Theory to Practice, Sustainability 12 (7), 2960 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072960. [Google Scholar]
  31. G.E. Kim and J.R. Lee, The impact of Historic Building Preservation in Urban Economics: Focusing on Accomodation Prices in Jeonju Hanok Village, Southe Korea, Sustainability 12 (12), 5005 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125005. [Google Scholar]
  32. B.A. Khatib, Y.S. Poh and A. El-Shafie, Materials Challenges in Reconstruction of Historical Projects: A Case Study of the Old Riwaq Project, Sustainability 11 (17), 4533 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174533. [Google Scholar]
  33. M.A. Sanchez, Integrating sustainability issues into project management, Journal of Cleaner Production 96, pp. 319-330 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.087. [Google Scholar]
  34. L.Y. Schem et al., A checklist for assessing sustainability performance of construction projects, Journal of Ciliv Engineering and management 13 (4), pp. 273-281 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2007.9636447. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.