Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 644, 2025
EUROGEO 8 - 8th European Conference on Geosynthetics
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 10
Section Sustainability and Durability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564401002
Published online 01 September 2025
  1. L. Van Schoors and F. Farcas, Représentativité des méthodes de vieillissement des géotextiles en polypropylène : état de l’art, 10èmes Rencontres Géosynthétiques, La Rochelle, France, March 24-26 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. B. V. Wiewel and M. Lamoree, Geotextile composition, application and ecotoxicology—A review, J. Hazard. Mater. 317, 640–655 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.060 [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Delannoy, S. Marceau, P. Glé, E. Gourlay, M. Guéguen-Minerbe, D. Diafi, I. Nour, S. Amziane, and F. Farcas, Aging of hemp shiv used for concrete, Mater. Des. 160, 752–762 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.016 [Google Scholar]
  4. IDRRIM, Guide des terrassements des remblais et des couches de forme : Fascicule n°1 Principes généraux, Cerema, 118 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Van Schoors, N. Beauzieres, T. Cadu, O. Sicot, and E. Keita, Relationship between physicochemical evolution and the failure process of flax fibers aged in water, J. Mater. Sci. 56 10664–10675 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-05908-z [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Li and B. Xue, Hydrothermal ageing mechanisms of unidirectional flax fabric reinforced epoxy composites, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 126, 144–158 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Wei and C. Meyer, Degradation mechanisms of natural fiber in the matrix of cement composites, Cem. Concr. Res. 73, 1–16 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.019 [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Elmoudnia, P. Faria, R. Jalal, M. Waqif, and L. Saadi, Effectiveness of alkaline and hydrothermal treatments on cellulosic fibers extracted from the Moroccan Pennisetum Alopecuroides plant: Chemical and morphological characterization, Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 5, 100276 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2022.100276 [Google Scholar]
  9. J. L. Stapper, F. Gauvin, and H. J. H. Brouwers, Influence of short-term degradation on coir in natural fibre-cement composites, Constr. Build. Mater. 306, 124906 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124906 [Google Scholar]
  10. N. F. Ismail, N. A. Mohd Radzuan, A. B. Sulong, N. Muhamad, and C. H. Che Haron, The Effect of Alkali Treatment on Physical, Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Kenaf Fiber and Polymer Epoxy Composites, Polym. 13, 2005 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13122005 [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Setswalo, O. P. Oladijo, M. Namoshe, S. Siengchin, and M. R. Sanjay, Insights into the effects of alkaline treatment and soaking duration on the properties of pterocarpus angolensis (mukwa) wood fibers, Mater. Today: Proc. 77, 1132–1136 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.239 [Google Scholar]
  12. AF OR, F E ISO 12226 Géosynthétiques : Essais généraux d’évaluation après essais de durabilité 12 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  13. AFNOR, NF EN ISO 13934-1, Textiles — Propriétés des étoffes en traction — Partie 1 : Détermination de la force maximale et de l’allongement à la force maximale par la méthode sur bande 22 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  14. AFNOR, NF EN ISO 11058 Géotextiles et produits apparentés Détermination des caractéristiques de perméabilité à l’eau normalement au plan, sans contrainte mécanique, 26 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. AFNOR, NF EN ISO 12956 Géotextiles et produits apparentés Détermination de l’ouverture de filtration caractéristique, 2 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  16. AFNOR, NFd EN ISO 9864 Géosynthétiques — éthode d’essai pour la détermination de la masse surfacique des géotextiles et produits apparentés 09 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  17. AFNOR, NF EN ISO 9863–1 Géosynthétiques — Détermination de l’épaisseur à des pressions spécifiées — Partie 1 : Couches individuelles, 13 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  18. CFG, Définition, mise en œuvre et dimensionnement des géosynthétiques, Le moniteur 5811, 39 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Thygesen, A. B. Thomsen, G. Daniel, and H. Lilholt, Comparison of composites made from fungal defibrated hemp with composites of traditional hemp yarn, Ind. Crops Prod. 25, 147–159 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. R. M. Rowell and H. P. Stout, Jute and kenaf, (Handbook of Fiber Chemistry. Boca Raton, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  21. P. H. P. M. da Silveira, M. P. Ribeiro, T. T. Silva, A. M. Lima, M. F. Lemos, A. G. B. A. M. Oliveira, L. F. C. Nascimento, A. V. Gomes, and S. N. Monteiro, Effect of Alkaline Treatment and Graphene Oxide Coating on Thermal and Chemical Properties of Hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.) Fibers, J. Nat. Fibers 19, 12168–12181 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2022.2053265 [Google Scholar]
  22. S. E. Samaei, H. A. Mahabadi, S. M. Mousavi, A. Khavanin, M. Faridan, and E. Taban, The influence of alkaline treatment on acoustical, morphological, tensile and thermal properties of Kenaf natural fibers, J. Ind. Text. 51, 8601S8625S (2022) https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083720944240 [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Thapliyal, S. Verma, P. Sen, R. Kumar, A. Thakur, A. K. Tiwari, D. Singh, G. D. Verros, and R. K. Arya, Natural Fibers Composites: Origin, Importance, Consumption Pattern, and Challenges, J. Compos. Sci. 7, 506 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7120506 [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Kumar, Y. S. Negi, V. Choudhary, and N. K. Bhardwaj, Characterization of Cellulose Nanocrystals Produced by Acid-Hydrolysis from Sugarcane Bagasse as Agro-Waste, J. Mater. Phys. Chem. 2, 1 (2014) https://doi.org/10.12691/jmpc-2-1-1 [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Y. Oh, D. I. Yoo, Y. Shin, and G. Seo, FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide, Carbohydr. Res. 340, 417–428 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2004.11.027 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.