Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 644, 2025
EUROGEO 8 - 8th European Conference on Geosynthetics
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02004 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | Testing and Quality | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564402004 | |
| Published online | 01 September 2025 | |
- R.H. Chen, Y.W. Huang, F.C. Huang, Confinement effect of geocells on sand samples under triaxial compression. Geotext. Geomembr., 37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.01.004 [Google Scholar]
- R.J. Bathurst, R. Karpurapu, Large-Scale Triaxial Compression Testing of GeocellReinforced Granular Soils. Geotech. Test. J., 16, 13 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10050J [Google Scholar]
- X. Sun, X. Tang, W. Zhang, Magnified resilient behavior of recycled aggregates due to lateral restraint of geosynthetic under cyclic loading. Transp. Geotech., 45, 101206 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101206 [Google Scholar]
- A. Krishna, G.M. Latha, Fabrication and Testing of Low Strength Geocells Using 3D Printed Polypropylene Sheets. Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-024-00547-1 [Google Scholar]
- H. Lei, T. Ma, S. Feng, L. Wang, Confinement effect of geocell on the mechanical characteristics of reinforced sand subgrade. Transp. Geotech., 48, 101336 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101336 [Google Scholar]
- I. Amurane, M. Zhang, T. Li, H. Jiang, Optimization of 3D printed geocells based on numerical simulation and experimental investigation. Earth Environ. Sci., 233, 032043 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/233/3/032043 [Google Scholar]
- American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2011). D 2487–11 Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) [Google Scholar]
- European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (2012). EN ISO 933-1:2012 Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates — Part 1: Determination of particle size distribution — Sieving method [Google Scholar]
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2004). ISO/TS 17892-12:2004 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil — Part 12: Determination of Atterberg Limits [Google Scholar]
- American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2007). D1557-07 Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)) [Google Scholar]
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2004). ISO/TS 17892-3:2004 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil — Part 3: Determination of particle density [Google Scholar]
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2004). ISO/TS 17892-9:2004 Geotechnical investigation and testing — Laboratory testing of soil — Part 9: Consolidated triaxial compression tests on water-saturated soils [Google Scholar]
- D.J. Henkel, G.C. Gilbert, The Effect of Rubber Membranes on the Measured Triaxial Compression Strength of Clay Samples. Geotechnique, 3, 1 (1952) https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1952.3.1.20 [Google Scholar]
- M. Budhu, Soil mechanics and foundations (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2010) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.