Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 644, 2025
EUROGEO 8 - 8th European Conference on Geosynthetics
Article Number 02014
Number of page(s) 10
Section Testing and Quality
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564402014
Published online 01 September 2025
  1. C. H. Benson, D. E. Daniel, and G. P. Boutwell, Field performance of compacted clay liners, J Geotech and Geoenviron Eng 125, 390 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  2. X. Qian, R. M. Koerner, and D. H. Gray, Geotechnical aspects of landfill design and construction (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Alston, D. E. Daniel, and D. J. Devroy, Design and construction of sand-bentonite liner for effluent treatment lagoon, marathon, Ontario, Canadian Geotechnical Journal 134, 841 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  4. C. H. Benson, A. H. Ören, and W. P. Gates, Hydraulic conductivity of two geosynthetic clay liners permeated with a hyperalkaline solution, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 28, 206 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. H. Ören, S. Durukan, and A. Ş. Kayalar, Influence of compaction water content on the hydraulic conductivity of sand bentonite and zeolite-bentonite mixtures, Clay Miner 49, 109 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  6. R. M. Koerner, Designing with geosynthetics, Fifth Edition (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  7. C. D. Shackelford, C. H. Benson, T. Katsumi, T. B. Edil, and L. Lin, Evaluating the hydraulic conductivity of GCLs permeated with non-standard liquids, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 18, 133 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Y. Jo, T. Katsumi, C. H. Benson, and T. B. Edil, Hydraulic conductivity and swelling of nonprehydrated GCLs permeated with single-species salt solutions, J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127, 557 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  9. D. C. Kolstad, C. H. Benson, T. B. Edil, and H. Y. Jo, Hydraulic conductivity and swell of nonprehydrated geosynthetic clay liners permeated with multispecies inorganic solutions, J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 11, 1236 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Katsumi, H. Ishimori, M. Onikata, and R. Fukagawa, Long-term barrier performance of modified bentonite materials against sodium and calcium permeant solutions, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 26, 14 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  11. A. H. Ören and R. Ç. Akar, Swelling and hydraulic conductivity of bentonites permeated with landfill leachates, Appl Clay Sci 142, 81 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  12. R. K. Rowe and S. Hamdan, Effect of wet-dry cycles on standard & polymer-amended GCLs in covers subjected to flow over the GCL, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 49, 1165 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  13. J.-M. Lee and C. D. Shackelford, Concentration dependency of the prehydration effect for a geosynthetic clay liner, Soils and Foundations 45, 27 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  14. J.-M. Lee, C. D. Shackelford, C. H. Benson, H.-Y. Jo, and T. B. Edil, Correlating index properties and hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners, J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131, 1319 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Scalia IV, C. H. Benson, G. L. Bohnhoff, T. B. Edil, and C. D. Shackelford, Longterm hydraulic conductivity of a bentonite-polymer composite permeated with aggressive inorganic solutions, J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Demir Sürer, T. Özdamar Kul, and A. Hakan Ören, Hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners to trona ash leachate: effects of mass per unit area, bundles of fiber existence, and preydration conditions, Waste Management 174, 351 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  17. M. H. Gleason, D. E. Daniel, and G. R. Eykholt, Calcium and sodium bentonite for hydraulic containment applications, J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123, 438 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  18. R. J. Petrov and R. K. Rowe, Geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) Chemical compatibility by hydraulic conductivity testing and factors impacting its performance, Canadian Geotechnical Journal 34, 863 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  19. J. L. Ruhl and D. E. Daniel, Geosynthetic clay liners permeated with chemical solutions and leachates, J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123, 369 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  20. A. H. Ören and H. Demirkıran, [Geosentetik kil örtülerin hidrolik iletkenliklerinin laboratuvarda belirlenmesi üzerine bir çalışma], İMO Teknik Dergi 26, 7191 (2015) (Article in Turkish). [Google Scholar]
  21. R. J. Petrov, R. Kerry Rowe, and R. M. Quigley, Comparison of laboratory-measured GCL hydraulic conductivity based on three permeameter types, Geotechnical Testing Journal, GTJODJ 20, 49 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  22. R. J. Petrov, R. K. Rowe, and R. M. Quigley, Selected factors influencing GCL hydraulic conductivity, J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123, 683 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  23. B. S. Olek, Experimental insights into consolidation rates during one-dimensional loading with special reference to excess pore water pressure, Acta Geotech 15, 3571 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Katsumi, H. Ishimori, A. Ogawa, S. Maruyama, and R. Fukagawa, Long-term barrier performance of modified bentonite materials against sodium and calcium permeant solutions, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 26, 14 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  25. ASTM D2216-10, Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  26. ASTM D5993-18, Standard test method for measuring mass per unit of geosynthetic clay liners, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Demirci, Investigating the Volume Change of Geosynthetic Clay Liners (GCLs) under Different Loading and Pore Fluid Conditions, Dokuz Eylül University, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  28. N. Demirci and A. H. Ören, Measuring vertical deformations of geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) during hydraulic conductivity tests by modifying flexible wall permeameter, Proceedings of 3rd International Civil Engineering and Architecture Conference Volume 1: Civil Engineering (ICEARC’23) (Golden Light Publishing, 2024). [Google Scholar]
  29. ASTM D5856-15, Standard test method for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of porous material using a rigid-wall, compaction-mold permeameter, (2015). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.