EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 644 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 644 (2025) 03019 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 644, 2025
EUROGEO 8 - 8th European Conference on Geosynthetics
Article Number 03019
Number of page(s) 10
Section Reinforcement Applications
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564403019
Published online 01 September 2025
  1. P. Jelusic and B. Zlender, Numerical Validation of Strains in Geogrids Embedded in Bridge Abutments, Lect. Notes Civ. Eng., vol. 288 LNCE, pp. 500–506, 2023. https://doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12851-6_59. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. J. Bathurst and F. M. Naftchali, Geosynthetic reinforcement stiffness for analytical and numerical modelling of reinforced soil structures, Geotext. Geomembranes, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 921–940, 2021, https://doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.01.003. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Al-Barqawi, R. Aqel, M. Wayne, H. Titi, and R. Elhajjar, Polymer geogrids: A review of material, design and structure relationships, Materials (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 16, 2021. https://doi:10.3390/ma14164745. [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Rimoldi, J. Shamrock, J. Kawalec, and N. Touze, Sustainable use of geosynthetics in dykes, Sustain., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1–31, 2021. https://doi:10.3390/su13084445. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng L, Tong L, and Chong K, Revisión de Aplicación e Innovación de Geotextiles en Ingeniería Geotécnica, Materials (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1–21, 2020, [Online]. Available: file:///C:/Users/DELL/Downloads/materials-1301774.pdf [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Yoo, Geosynthetic Solutions for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure Development, Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 22, p. 15772, 2023. https://doi:10.3390/su152215772. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Sulovska and J. Stacho, Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Structures with a Passive Facing System Using Different Computational Methods, Civ. Environ. Eng., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 500–512, 2021. https://doi:10.2478/cee-2021-0052. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Vibha and P. V. Divya, Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Walls with Sustainable Backfills, Indian Geotech. J., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1135–1144, 2021. https://doi:10.1007/s40098-020-00450-2. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Lelli, R. Laneri, and P. Rimoldi, Innovative reinforced soil structures for high walls and slopes combining polymeric and metallic reinforcements, Procedia Eng., vol. 125, pp. 397–405, 2015. https://doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.099. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. R. Khan and G. Di Emidio, Numerical analysis using FEM on the behavior of reinforced fill structure having geogrid and steel wire mesh as a reinforcing element, Geosynth. Lead. W. to a Resilient Planet, pp. 991–996, 2023. https://doi:10.1201/9781003386889-121. [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Lin, B. Huang, and S. Lin, Deformation Analyses of Gabion Structures, Proc. INTERPRAEVENT Conf., pp. 512–526, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Uray, Gabion structures and retaining walls design criteria, pp. 127–134, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  13. Z. Wang, F. Jacobs, and M. Ziegler, Experimental and DEM investigation of geogrid-soil interaction under pullout loads, Geotext. Geomembranes, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 230–246, 2016. https://doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.11.001. [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Engineering, U. Polit, and V. S. L. Technical, School of Civil Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya BarcelonaTech, Barcelona, Spain. VSL International Ltd. VSL Technical Center Barcelona, Spain. 3 Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, Canada., pp. 1–18, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Report, “Technical Report Iso / Tr, Measurement, vol. 2004, p. 14345, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. R. Khan and G. Di Emidio, Prediction of creep behaviour of Geogrid reinforced fill structure using numerical analysis: A Finite Element Method, in 9th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Mohiuddin, Analysis of laboratory and field pull-out tests of geosynthetics in clayey soils. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Kupec, Bridge Abutments from Geogrid Reinforced Soil, NZ Geomech. News, no. 102, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. S. Vadavadagi, S. Chawla, and P. Kumar, Prediction and validation of geogrid tensile force distribution in back-to-back MSE walls under rail axle load: finiteelement and intelligent techniques, Environ. Earth Sci., vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 1–22, 2024. https://doi:10.1007/s12665-024-11443-2. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Lees, Geotechnical Finite Element Analysis. ICE publishing, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Hajiazizi and M. Nasiri, The effects of strength parameters on slope safety factor in 2D & 3D analyses using numerical methods, Int. J. Min. Geo-Engineering, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 71–75, 2020. https://doi:10.22059/IJMGE.2019.257379.594740. [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Mohd Saim and A. Kasa, Effect of Mesh Coarseness on Slope Stability Analysis Using 2D and 3D Finite Element Method, J. Kejuruter., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 497–507, 2024. https://doi:10.17576/jkukm-2024-36(2)-11. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.