Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 645, 2025
The 1st International Conference on Green Engineering for Sustainable Future (ICoGESF 2025)
Article Number 05003
Number of page(s) 10
Section Environmental Monitoring and Climate Change Mitigation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564505003
Published online 28 August 2025
  1. Pathak, S., H. K. Panta, T. Bhandari, and K. P. Paudel, Flood vulnerability and its influencing factors, Nat. Hazards 104, 2175 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04267-3 [Google Scholar]
  2. Fitra, J., S. M. T. Debataraja, and L. Lismawaty, Identification of flood vulnerability using the topographic wetness index method in Pantai Labu Baru village, Deli Serdang, North Sumatera, E3S Web Conf. 483, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448301014 [Google Scholar]
  3. Rakuasa, H., J. K. Helwend, and D. A. Sihasale, Sihasale, Pemetaan Daerah Rawan Banjir di Kota Ambon Menggunakan Sistim Informasi Geografis, J. Geogr. Media Inf. Pengemb. dan Profesi Kegeografian 19, 73 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayehu, G. T., T. Tadesse, B. Gessesse, and T. Dinku, Validation of new satellite rainfall products over the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia, Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11, 1921 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1921-2018 [Google Scholar]
  5. Darmawan, K., H. A. Hani’ah, and A. Suprayogi, Analisis Tingkat Kerawanan Banjir di Kabupaten Sampang Menggunakan Metode Overlay dengan Scoring Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis, J. Geod. Undip 6, 31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14710/jgundip.2017.15024 [Google Scholar]
  6. Hagos, Y.G., T.G. Andualem, M. Yibeltal, M.A. Mengie, Flood hazard assessment and mapping using GIS integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in upper Awash River basin, Ethiopia. Appl. Water Sci. 12, 148 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01674-8 [Google Scholar]
  7. K. S. Vignesh, I. Anandakumar, R. Ranjan, and D. Borah, Flood vulnerability assessment using an integrated approach of multi-criteria decision-making model and geospatial techniques, Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 7, 767 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00997-2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, X., Xie, H. A review on applications of remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) in water resources and flood risk management. Water 10, 608 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050608 [Google Scholar]
  9. Salami, A.A., J.F. Olorunfemi, A.O. Eludoyin, Multi-criteria assessment of gridded rainfall data accuracy in Nigeria using compromise programming. Earth Syst. Environ. 1-28 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-025-00601-6 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ahmed, N., M.A.A. Hoque, N. Howlader, B. Pradhan, Flood risk assessment: role of mitigation capacity in spatial flood risk mapping. Geocarto Int. 37, 8394-8416 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.2002422 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, Y., D. Wang, L. Zhang, H. Guo, J. Ma, W. Gao, Flood risk assessment of Wuhan, China, using a multi-criteria analysis model with the improved AHP-Entropy method. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 96001-96018 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29066-8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Wiwoho B. S., I. S. Astuti, I. A. G. Alfarizi, and H. R. Sucahyo, Validation of three daily satellite rainfall products in a humid tropic watershed, brantas, indonesia: Implications to land characteristics and hydrological modelling, Hydrology 8, (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8040154 [Google Scholar]
  13. Nawaz M., M. F. Iqbal, and I. Mahmood, Validation of CHIRPS satellite-based precipitation dataset over Pakistan, Atmos. Res. 248, 105289 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105289 [Google Scholar]
  14. Omar G. M., J. E. Paturel, C. Salles, G. Mahe, M. Jalludin, F. Satge, M. Ismail Nour, and A. Hassan Hersi, Comparative study from ground-based rain gauges vs. rainfall products at different time steps in the southeast of the Republic of Djibouti, Proc. Int. Assoc. Hydrol. Sci. 385, 59 (2024). https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-59-2024 [Google Scholar]
  15. Li Q., J. Wei, J. Yin, Z. Qiao, W. Peng, and H. Peng, Multiscale comparative evaluation of the GPM and TRMM precipitation products against ground precipitation observations over chinese tibetan plateau, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 14, 2295 (2021). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.