Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 645, 2025
The 1st International Conference on Green Engineering for Sustainable Future (ICoGESF 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 06014 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Educational Sciences | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564506014 | |
| Published online | 28 August 2025 | |
- L. Wang, X. Chen, C. Wang, L. Xu, R. Shadiev, dan Y. Li, “ChatGPT’s capabilities in providing feedback on undergraduate students’ argumentation: A case study,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 51, no. August 2023, hal. 101440, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101440. [Google Scholar]
- A. S. Espartinez, “Exploring student and teacher perceptions of ChatGPT use in higher education: A Q-Methodology study,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, no. June, hal. 100264, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100264. [Google Scholar]
- S. Groothuijsen, A. van den Beemt, J. C. Remmers, dan L. W. van Meeuwen, “AI chatbots in programming education: Students’ use in a scientific computing course and consequences for learning,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, no. September 2023, hal. 100290, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100290. [Google Scholar]
- V. Geckin, E. Kiziltaş, Dan Ç. Çinar, “Assessing second-language academic writing: AI vs. Human raters,” J. Educ. Technol. Online Learn., vol. 6, no. 4, hal. 1096-1108, 2023, DOI: 10.31681/jetol.1336599. [Google Scholar]
- M. F. Teng, “‘ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies’: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, no. July, hal. 100270, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270. [Google Scholar]
- J. Steiss dkk., “Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing,” Learn. Instr., vol. 91, no. March, hal. 101894, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Jiang, J. Hao, M. Fauss, dan C. Li, “Detecting ChatGPT-generated essays in a large- scale writing assessment: Is there a bias against non-native English speakers?,” Comput. Educ., vol. 217, no. November 2023, hal. 105070, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105070. [Google Scholar]
- M. Asadi, S. Ebadi, dan L. Mohammadi, “The Impact of Integrating ChatGPT with Teachers’ Feedback on EFL Writing Skills,” Think. Ski. Creat., hal. 101766, 2025, DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101766. [Google Scholar]
- M. D. C. Hampton, R. Rosenblum, C. D. Hill-Williams, L. Creighton-Wong, dan W. A. Randall, “Scientific writing development: Improve DNP student skill and writing efficiency,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 112, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105334. [Google Scholar]
- S. Toscu, “ChatGPT: Is It Reliable as an Automated Writing Evaluation Tool?,” Anadolu J. Educ. Sci. Int., vol. 15, no. 1, hal. 329-349, 2024, DOI: 10.18039/ajesi.1463503. [Google Scholar]
- T. Yamasaki dan A. Hiramatsu, “Experiments of Automatic Scoring Using Generative AI in a Summary Essay Learning System,” tters Institutional Res., vol. 004, no. LIR294, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.52731/lir.v004.294Experiments. [Google Scholar]
- M. Liu dan H. Reinders, “Do AI chatbots impact motivation? Insights from a preliminary longitudinal study,” System, vol. 128, no. March 2024, hal. 103544, 2025, DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2024.103544. [Google Scholar]
- S. Tobler, “Smart grading: A generative AI-based tool for knowledge-grounded answer evaluation in educational assessments,” MethodsX, vol. 12, no. November 2023, hal. 102531, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102531. [Google Scholar]
- A. Pack, A. Barrett, dan J. Escalante, “Large language models and automated essay scoring of English language learner writing: Insights into validity and reliability,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 6, no. April, hal. 100234, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100234. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.