EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 646 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 646 (2025) 00046 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 646, 2025
Global Environmental Science Forum “Sustainable Development of Industrial Region” (GESF-2025)
Article Number 00046
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564600046
Published online 28 August 2025
  1. R. Sadeghbeigi, Fluid catalytic cracking handbook: An expert guide to the practical operation, design, and optimization of FCC units (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/C2010-0-67291-9 [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Bai, U.J. Etim, Z. Yan, S. Mintova, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhong, X. Gao, Fluid catalytic cracking technology: current status and recent discoveries on catalyst contamination. Ca. Rev. 61(3), 333 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2018.1549011 [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Basu, Combustion and gasification in fluidized beds (CRC press, Boca Raton, 2006) https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420005158 [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Özkaya, A.H. Kaksonen, E. Sahinkaya, J.A. Puhakka, Fluidized bed bioreactor for multiple environmental engineering solutions. Water Res. 150, 452 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.11.061 [Google Scholar]
  5. H. de Lasa (ed.), Chemical Reactor Design and Technology: Overview of the New Developments of Energy and Petrochemical Reactor Technologies. Projections for the 90’s (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  6. S.A. Solov’ev, A.G. Egorov, A.A. Lamberov, S.R. Egorova, A.N. Kataev, A.N. Effect of the design of a feedstock injection device in a fluidized bed reactor on the efficiency of the reaction, using the dehydrogenation of iso-paraffins in a fluidized chromia-alumina catalyst bed as an example. Catalysis in Industry. 8(1), 48 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S207005041601013X [Google Scholar]
  7. H.Q. Che, H.G. Wang, L.J. Xu, R.H. Ge. Investigation of gas-solid heat and mass transfer in a Wurster coater using a scaled CFD-DEM model. Powder Technology. 406, 117598. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117598 [Google Scholar]
  8. S.K.D. Singh, J.-F. Dietiker, K. Lu. Polysiloxane coatings on microspheres based on multiphase flow with interface exchange - discrete element modelling. Particuology. 69, 88 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2021.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Lu. GPU accelerated MFiX-DEM simulations of granular and multiphase flows. Particuology. 62, 14 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2021.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Shi, A. Komrakova, P. Nikrityuk. Fluidized beds modeling: Validation of 2D and 3D simulations against experiments. Powder Technology. 343, 479 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.11.043 [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Wang. Continuum theory for dense gas-solid flow: A state-of-the-art review. Chemical Engineering Science. 215, 115428 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.115428 [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Li, Y. Shen. Numerical simulation of multiphase flow in a full coal-direct chemical looping combustion process. Chemical Engineering Science. 248, 117233 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117233 [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Loha, H. Chattopadhyay, P.K. Chatterjee, Euler-Euler CFD modeling of fluidized bed: Influence of specularity coefficient on hydrodynamic behavior. Particuology. 11(6), 673 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2012.08.007 [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Bian, X. Chen, J. Wang, A critical comparison of two-fluid model? Discrete particle method and direct numerical simulation for modeling dense gas-solid flow of rough spheres. Chem. Eng. Sci. 210, 115233 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.115233 [Google Scholar]
  15. G.G.B. Antunes, A. Bück, F.P. Mariano, A.G. Girardi, D.A. dos Santos, Particle dynamics in a pseudo-2D spouted bed: Experiments and Euler–Lagrange simulations. Chem. Eng. J. 491, 152007. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.152007 [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Tianqi, Y. He, A. Ren, T. Wang, Experimental study and DEM numerical simulation of dry/wet particle flow behaviors in a spouted bed. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58(33), 15353 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02448 [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Thornton, Granular dynamics, contact mechanics and particle system simulations: DEM study (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18711-2 [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Pietsch, S. Heinrich, K. Karpinski, M. Müller, M. Schonherr, F.K. Jager, CFD-DEM modeling of a three-dimensional prismatic spouted bed. Powder Technol. 316, 245 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.12.046 [Google Scholar]
  19. Q.W. Zhang, C. Cai, D. Lu, H. Gidaspow, Modified MFIX code to simulate hydrodynamics of gas-solids bubbling fluidized beds: A model of coupled kinetic theory of granular flow and discrete element method. Powder Technol. 357, 417 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.08.056 [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Sanfilippo, I. Miracca, Dehydrogenation of paraffins: synergies between catalyst design and reactor engineering. Cat. Today. 111 (1-2), 133 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.10.012 [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Sanfilippo, Dehydrogenations in fluidized bed: Catalysis and reactor engineering. Cat. Today. 178 (1), 142 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2011.07.013 [Google Scholar]
  22. S.A. Solovev, O.V. Soloveva, G.E. Bekmukhamedov, S.R. Egorova, A.A. Lamberov, CFD-simulation of isobutane dehydrogenation for a fluidized bed reactor. ChemEng. 6(6), 98 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering6060098 [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Gidaspow, Multiphase Flow and Fluidization (Academic Press, Cambridge, 1994) [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Ogawa, A. Umemura, N. Oshima, On the equation of fully fluidized granular materials. J. App. Math. Phys. 31, 483 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01590859 [Google Scholar]
  25. C.K.K. Lun, S.B. Savage, D.J. Jeffrey, Kinetic theories for granular flow: Inelastic particles in couette flow and slightlyinelastic particles in a general flow field. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 223 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112084000586 [Google Scholar]
  26. D.J. Gunn, Transfer of heat or mass to particles in fixed and fluidized beds. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 21, 467 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(78)90080-7 [Google Scholar]
  27. S.A. Solovev, O.V. Soloveva, Study of the influence of the mean particle diameter choice and the fractions number on the quality of fluidized bed numerical simulation. Processes. 12(11), 2528 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112528 [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Wang, L.-S. Fan, Particle characterization and behavior relevant to fluidized bed combustion and gasification systems, in: Fluid. Bed Technol. Near-Zero Emiss. Combust. Gasif. (Elsevier, 2013) https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098801.1.42 [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Gobin, H. Neau, O. Simonin, J. Llinas, V. Reiling, J. Selo, Numerical simulations of a gas-phase polymerization reactor. In: Proceedings of European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Wales. (2001) [Google Scholar]
  30. J.T. Cornelissen, F. Taghipour, R. Escudie, N. Ellis, J.R. Grace, CFD modelling of a liquid–solid fluidized bed. Chem. Eng. Sci. 62, 6334 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.07.014 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.