EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 647 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 647 (2025) 01002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 647, 2025
2025 The 8th International Conference on Renewable Energy and Environment Engineering (REEE 2025)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 11
Section Renewable Energy Technologies and Assessment of Renewable Energy Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564701002
Published online 29 August 2025
  1. A. Ajanovic, A. Glatt, and R. Haas, “Prospects and impediments for hydrogen fuel cell buses,” Energy, vol. 235, p. 121340, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121340. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Manoharan et al., “Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles; Current Status and Future Prospect,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 11, p. 2296, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9112296. [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Trencher, “Strategies to accelerate the production and diffusion of fuel cell electric vehicles: Experiences from California,” Energy Reports, vol. 6, pp. 2503–2519, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.09.008. [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Wen, B. Rogie, M. R. Kærn, and E. Rothuizen, “A first study of the potential of integrating an ejector in hydrogen fuelling stations for fuelling high pressure hydrogen vehicles,” Applied Energy, vol. 260, p. 113958, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113958. [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Charton, C. Perret, and H. T. Phan, “Analysis of Supersonic Flows inside a Steam Ejector with Liquid–Vapor Phase Change Using CFD Simulations,” Thermo, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/thermo4010001. [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Rogié, M. Ryhl Kærn, C. Wen, and E. Rothuizen, “Numerical optimization of a novel gas-gas ejector for fuelling of hydrogen vehicles,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 41, pp. 21905–21919, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.169. [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Rogié, C. Wen, M. R. Kærn, and E. Rothuizen, “Optimisation of the fuelling of hydrogen vehicles using cascade systems and ejectors,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 14, pp. 9567–9579, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.098. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Feng, J. Han, Z. Pang, and X. Peng, “Designing Hydrogen Recirculation Ejectors for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Systems,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 1201, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16031201. [Google Scholar]
  9. N. A. A. Qasem and G. A. Q. Abdulrahman, “A Recent Comprehensive Review of Fuel Cells: History, Types, and Applications,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 2024, no. 1, p. 7271748, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1155/2024/7271748. [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Fan, Z. Tu, and S. H. Chan, “Recent development of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies: A review,” Energy Reports, vol. 7, pp. 8421–8446, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.08.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Sammes, R. Bove, and K. Stahl, “Phosphoric acid fuel cells: Fundamentals and applications,” Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 372–378, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2005.01.001. [Google Scholar]
  12. V. Patil et al., “Degradation mechanisms in PEM fuel cells: A brief review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, p. S221478532301670X, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.603. [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Zhang et al., “The experiment and the control of hydrogen circulation of fuel cell based on of fuel ejector: A review,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 50, pp. 1415–1431, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.307. [Google Scholar]
  14. B. El Zohbi, N. Bukharin, H. H. Assoum, K. Abed-Meraim, A. Sakout, and M. El Hassan, “Investigation of the effects of the jet nozzle geometry and location on the performance of supersonic fluid ejectors,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 228–233, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.029. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. El Hassan, “Numerical Investigation of the Flow Dynamics Inside Supersonic Fluid Ejector,” Arab J Sci Eng, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 909–919, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13369-019-04179-w. [Google Scholar]
  16. N. Bukharin and M. El Hassan, “Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Supersonic Binary Fluid Ejector Performance,” Fluids, vol. 8, no. 7, p. 197, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/fluids8070197. [Google Scholar]
  17. B. M. Tashtoush, M. A. Al-Nimr, and M. A. Khasawneh, “A comprehensive review of ejector design, performance, and applications,” Applied Energy, vol. 240, pp. 138–172, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.185. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. El Hassan and N. Bukharin, “Numerical investigation of the flow dynamics inside single fluid and binary fluid ejectors,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1276, no. 1, p. 012012, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1276/1/012012. [Google Scholar]
  19. M. El Hassan, H. H. Assoum, N. Bukharin, K. Abed-Meraim, and A. Sakout, “Investigation of thermo-physical fluid properties effect on binary fluid ejector performance,” Energy Reports, vol. 6, pp. 287–292, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.076. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. El Hassan, “System COP of Ejector-Based Ground-Source Heat Pumps,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 22, p. 8509, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15228509. [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Chen, C. Cai, J. Luo, and H. Zhang, “Quasi One-Dimensional characteristic analysis of ejector nozzle for turbofan propulsion system,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 239, p. 122112, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.122112. [Google Scholar]
  22. E. S. Ali, H. Muhammad Asfahan, M. Sultan, and A. A. Askalany, “A novel ejectors integration with two-stages adsorption desalination: Away to scavenge the ambient energy,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 48, p. 101658, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101658. [Google Scholar]
  23. Q. Han et al., “Working condition expansion and performance optimization of two-stage ejector based on optimal switching strategy,” Energy, vol. 282, p. 128376, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128376. [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Koirala, Q. L. Ve, B. Zhu, K. Inthavong, and A. Date, “A Review on Process and Practices in Operation and Design Modification of Ejectors,” Fluids, vol. 6, no. 11, p. 409, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/fluids6110409. [Google Scholar]
  25. J.-H. Lee, A. Sameen, V. Sanal Kumar, H.-D. Kim, C. Bo-Gyu, and K.-H. Kim, “Studies on Ejector Systems for Hydrogen Fuel Cell,” in 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Tucson, Arizona: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Jul. 2005. doi: 10.2514/6.2005-3590. [Google Scholar]
  26. K. Nikiforow, P. Koski, H. Karimäki, J. Ihonen, and V. Alopaeus, “Designing a hydrogen gas ejector for 5 kW stationary PEMFC system - CFD-modeling and experimental validation,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, no. 33, pp. 14952–14970, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.122. [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Fan, D. Fan, W. Xiao, and C. Ye, “Simulation and optimization design of hydrogen ejector in proton exchange membrane fuel cell system,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 2360, no. 1, p. 012035, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2360/1/012035. [Google Scholar]
  28. Z. Xu, B. Liu, Y. Tong, Z. Dong, and Y. Feng, “Modeling and Control of Ejector-Based Hydrogen Circulation System for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Systems,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 11, p. 2460, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17112460. [Google Scholar]
  29. C. Antetomaso, A. Irimescu, S. S. Merola, B. M. Vaglieco, S. Di Micco, and E. Jannelli, “Ejector design for PEM fuel cells and assessment of its scalability,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 95, pp. 1235–1241, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.433. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rothuizen, Erasmus Damgaard, “Hydrogen Fuelling Stations: A Thermodynamic Analysis of Fuelling Hydrogen Vehicles for Personal Transportation.,” PhD, University of Denmark. Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/108702334/Hydrogen_Fuelling_Stations.pdf [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Alazemi and J. Andrews, “Automotive hydrogen fuelling stations: An international review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 48, pp. 483–499, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.085. [Google Scholar]
  32. V. P. Utgikar and T. Thiesen, “Safety of compressed hydrogen fuel tanks: Leakage from stationary vehicles,” Technology in Society, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 315–320, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.005. [Google Scholar]
  33. J. Kurtz, S. Sprik, and T. H. Bradley, “Review of transportation hydrogen infrastructure performance and reliability,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 23, pp. 12010–12023, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Genovese, D. Blekhman, M. Dray, and P. Fragiacomo, “Hydrogen losses in fueling station operation,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 248, p. 119266, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119266. [Google Scholar]
  35. K. Reddi, A. Elgowainy, and E. Sutherland, “Hydrogen refueling station compression and storage optimization with tube-trailer deliveries,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 39, no. 33, pp. 19169–19181, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.09.099. [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Gökçek and C. Kale, “Optimal design of a Hydrogen Refuelling Station (HRFS) powered by Hybrid Power System,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 161, pp. 215–224, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. S. S. Bhogilla and H. Niyas, “Design of a hydrogen compressor for hydrogen fueling stations,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 55, pp. 29329–29337, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.171. [Google Scholar]
  38. J. Chen et al., “Dynamic simulation of the potential of integrating a turbo-expander in a hydrogen refueling station,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 202, p. 117889, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117889. [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Genovese, V. Cigolotti, E. Jannelli, and P. Fragiacomo, “Hydrogen Refueling Process: Theory, Modeling, and In-Force Applications,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 6, p. 2890, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16062890. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.