EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 647 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 647 (2025) 01004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 647, 2025
2025 The 8th International Conference on Renewable Energy and Environment Engineering (REEE 2025)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Renewable Energy Technologies and Assessment of Renewable Energy Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564701004
Published online 29 August 2025
  1. IEA, Evolution of Renewable Electricity Generation in the United Kingdom, 2000-2020, IEA, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/evolution-of-renewable-electricitygeneration-in-the-united-kingdom-2000-2020. [Accessed: 19-Apr-2023]. [Google Scholar]
  2. UK Government, Net Zero Strategy, UK Government, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/net-zero-strategy. [Accessed: 07-Jul-2023]. [Google Scholar]
  3. G. M. Mudd, S. M. Jowitt, and T. T. Werner, “The world’s lead-zinc mineral resources: Scarcity, data, issues and opportunities,” Ore Geol. Rev., vol. 80, pp. 1160–1190, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Valero, A. Valero, G. Calvo, and A. Ortego, “Material bottlenecks in the future development of green technologies,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 93, pp. 178–200, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Mori, R. Stropnik, M. Sekavčnik, and A. Lotrič, “Criticality and Life-Cycle Assessment of Materials Used in Fuel-Cell and Hydrogen Technologies,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 3565, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  6. Mancini, L., Sala, S., Recchioni, M. et al. Potential of life cycle assessment for supporting the management of critical raw materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 100–116 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Deetman, H. S. de Boer, M. Van Engelenburg, E. van der Voet, and D. P. van Vuuren, “Projected material requirements for the global electricity infrastructure – generation, transmission and storage,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 164, p. 105200, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Watari, B. C. McLellan, D. Giurco, E. Dominish, E. Yamasue, and K. Nansai, “Total material requirement for the global energy transition to 2050: A focus on transport and electricity,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 148, pp. 91–103, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Mostert, B. Ostrander, S. Bringezu, and T. M. Kneiske, “Comparing Electrical Energy Storage Technologies Regarding Their Material and Carbon Footprint,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 3386, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Luderer, M. Pehl, A. Arvesen, T. Gibon, B. L. Bodirsky, H. S. de Boer, O. Fricko, M. Hejazi, F. Humpenöder, G. Iyer, S. Mima, I. Mouratiadou, R. C. Pietzcker, A. Popp, M. van den Berg, D. van Vuuren, and E. G. Hertwich, “Environmental cobenefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies,” Nat. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 5229, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Van der Voet, L. Van Oers, M. Verboon, and K. Kuipers, “Environmental Implications of Future Demand Scenarios for Metals: Methodology and Application to the Case of Seven Major Metals,” J. Ind. Ecol., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 141–155, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. E. G. Hertwich, T. Gibon, E. A. Bouman, A. Arvesen, S. Suh, G. A. Heath, J. D. Bergesen, A. Ramirez, M. I. Vega, and L. Shi, “Integrated lifecycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of lowcarbon technologies,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 112, no. 20, pp. 6277–6282, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. Mertens, J., Dewulf, J., Breyer, C. et al. From emissions to resources: mitigating the critical raw material supply chain vulnerability of renewable energy technologies. Miner Econ 37, 669–676 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  14. ISO, Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines, International Organization for Standardization, ISO14044:2015 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Schreiber, J. Marx, and P. Zapp, Comparative life cycle assessment of electricity generation by different wind turbine types, Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 561–572 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Kouloumpis and A. Azapagic, A model for estimating life cycle environmental impacts of offshore wind electricity considering specific characteristics of wind farms, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 495–506 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  17. Energy Numbers, Capacity Factors at UK Offshore Wind Farms, 2023, https://energynumbers.info/ukoffshore-wind-capacity-factors (Accessed: 2024-10-14). [Google Scholar]
  18. Ecoinvent Centre, Ecoinvent Database, 2021, http://www.ecoinvent.org/ (Accessed on: 2023-04-17). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.