EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 647 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 647 (2025) 03001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 647, 2025
2025 The 8th International Conference on Renewable Energy and Environment Engineering (REEE 2025)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 9
Section Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564703001
Published online 29 August 2025
  1. Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M, Andrady A, et al. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science. 2015;347(6223):768–71. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Li J, Liu H, Paul Chen J. Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review on occurrence, environmental effects, and methods for microplastics detection. Water Res 2020;175:115702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115702 [Google Scholar]
  3. De Feo G, Maffei PL, Ferrara C, Napoli RMA. Historical development of the Augustan Aqueduct in Southern Italy: Twenty centuries of works from Serino to Naples. Water Sci Technol Water Supply. 2014;14(6):1066–74. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2014.059 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnes DKA, Galgani F, Thompson RC, Barlaz M. Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1526):1985–98. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0205 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ryan PG. A Brief History of Marine Litter Research. In: Bergmann M, Gutow L, Klages M, editors. Marine Anthropogenic Litter. Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Derraik JGB. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: A review. Sea Pollut Bull. 2002;44(9):842–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00220-5 [Google Scholar]
  7. Turton A, Ceglinski P. Seabin Project: A solution to ocean pollution. Int J Environ Stud. 2018;75(2):268–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2017.1392991 [Google Scholar]
  8. Khuntia S, Majumder SK, Ghosh P. Microbubbleaided water and wastewater purification: A review. Rev Chem Eng. 2015;31(3):265–302. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2014-0037 [Google Scholar]
  9. Agarwal A, Ng WJ, Liu Y. Principle and applications of microbubble and nanobubble technology for water treatment. Chemosphere. 2011;84(9):1175–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.054 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Temesgen T, Bui TT, Han M, Kim T, Park H. Micro and nanobubble technologies as a new horizon for water-treatment techniques: A review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;246:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2017.06.011 [Google Scholar]
  11. Slat B, Fanini L, Doorenweerd C, van Sebille E. The Ocean Cleanup: Creating the first scalable cleanup system. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53(21):12229–37. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01464 [Google Scholar]
  12. Lindquist A. The Mr. Trash Wheel: Case study on the integration of sustainable technology in Baltimore’s Inner Harbor. J Environment Manage. 2017;193:314–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.014 [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang Z, Xiao Y, Li D. Autonomous marine vehicle path planning in the presence of obstacles and ocean currents: A bio-inspired approach. J Mar Sci Technol. 2019;24(4):1257–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0607-6 [Google Scholar]
  14. Schmaltz E, Melvin EC, Diana Z, Gunady EF, Rittschof D, Somarelli JA, et al. Plastic pollution solutions: Emerging technologies to prevent and collect marine plastic pollution. Environ Int 2020;144:106067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106067 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cózar A, González-Gordillo JI, Morales-Caselles C, Ruiz J. The plastic trap: Self-contamination of surface water by accumulation of plastic waste. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(14):9982–93. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02095 [Google Scholar]
  16. Li Y, Wolanski E, Dai Z, Lambrechts J, Tang C, Zhang H. Emerging technologies for marine debris removal: A review. Sci Total Environment. 2022;806:150682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150682 [Google Scholar]
  17. Brennecke D, Duarte B, Paiva F, Caçador I, CanningClode J. Integrated approach for removal of microplastics, pollutants and associated microbes in water treatment. Sci Total Environment. 2019;667:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.344 [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang X, Chen W. Nanobubble technology for enhancing water treatment: A review on formation, properties, and applications. Environ Sci Water Res Technol. 2020;6(10):2832–49. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EW00658K [Google Scholar]
  19. Rochman CM, Cook AM, Koelmans AA. Plastic debris and policy: Using current scientific understanding to invoke positive change. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2016;35(7):1617–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3408 [Google Scholar]
  20. Tsuge H. Microand nanobubbles: Fundamentals and applications. Bread Stanford Publishing; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17679 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ushikubo FY, Furukawa T, Nakagawa R, Enari M, Makino Y, Kawagoe Y, et al. Evidence of the existence and the stability of nano-bubbles in water. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2010;361(1-3):31–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gammons CH, Nimick DA, Parker SR, Snyder DM, McCleskey RB, Amils R, et al. Photoreduction fuels biogeochemical cycling of iron in Spain’s acid rivers. Chem Geol. 2013;360-361:203–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.10.015 [Google Scholar]
  23. Aguilera A, Gómez EB, Kaštovský J, Echenique RO, Salerno GL. The diversity of cyanobacteria on Andean microbial mats and their ecological implications. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2016;78(2):117–33. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01808 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lim MH, Seah H, Ong YT, Ashokkumar M, Kentish SE. Nanoand microbubbles in water and wastewater treatment. Curr Opinion Environ Sci Health. 2018;2:51–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hernández-Martínez JA, Ponce-Robles L, SalmerónGarcía I. Cost-effectiveness analysis of emerging technologies for water restoration in Latin America: Case studies and future directions. J Water Process Eng 2023;51:103400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103400 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cordova-Lepe F, Gutiérrez-Jara JP, Muñoz-Gajardo S. Low-energy hydrodynamic systems for water quality improvement: Modeling and applications. Water Resour Manag. 2021;35(4):1189–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02776-9 [Google Scholar]
  27. Basto RM, Figueiredo C, Ondina M, Silveira T, Soares A, Tato R, et al. Bubble Barrier technology for trapping floating debris in urban canals: An Amsterdam case study. Sea Pollut Bull. 2022;180:113773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113773 [Google Scholar]
  28. He J, Liu Y, Chen Y, Wang Z, Lai W, Hong Y, et al. Development and field testing of an autonomous robotic system for collecting floating plastic waste in reservoirs. J Clean Prod. 2021;315:128175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128175 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim JO, Jung JT, Yeom IT, Aoh GH. Effect of electric fields on the electrolysis of reverse osmosis concentrate using three-dimensional electrodes. Desalination. 2020;506:114959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114959 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.