EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 647 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 647 (2025) 03003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 647, 2025
2025 The 8th International Conference on Renewable Energy and Environment Engineering (REEE 2025)
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564703003
Published online 29 August 2025
  1. Zhang, Y. and Zhang, T., 2023. Culturing the uncultured microbial majority in activated sludge: a critical review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 53(5), pp.601–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2022.2077063 [Google Scholar]
  2. Begmatov, S., Dorofeev, A.G., Kadnikov, V.V., Beletsky, A.V., Pimenov, N.V., Ravin, N.V. and Mardanov, A.V., 2022. The structure of microbial communities of activated sludge of large-scale wastewater treatment plants in the city of Moscow. Scientific Reports, 12(1), p.3458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07132-4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang, Y., Wang, L., Xiang, F., Zhao, L. and Qiao, Z., 2020. Activated sludge microbial community and treatment performance of wastewater treatment plants in industrial and municipal zones. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), p.436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020436 [Google Scholar]
  4. Michałkiewicz, M., 2018. Comparison of wastewater treatment plants based on the emissions of microbiological contaminants. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 190(11), p.640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7035-2 [Google Scholar]
  5. Siatou, A., Manali, A. and Gikas, P., 2020. Energy consumption and internal distribution in activated sludge wastewater treatment plants of Greece. Water, 12(4), p.1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041204 [Google Scholar]
  6. Borzooei, S., Amerlinck, Y., Panepinto, D., Abolfathi, S., Nopens, I., Scibilia, G., Meucci, L. and Zanetti, M.C., 2020. Energy optimization of a wastewater treatment plant based on energy audit data: small investment with high return. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(15), pp.17972–17985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08277-3 [Google Scholar]
  7. Mehrdadi, N., Aghabalaei, V., Mardani, S. and Tabeshnia, M., 2021. The Importance of Optimizing Energy Consumption in Wastewater Treatment Plants-A Case Study of East Mashhad Wastewater Treatment Plant. Science and Engineering (JWWSE), 5(4), pp.41–52. https://www.academia.edu/download/97528407/article_119439_dad6b7d0b49c39d0612cbe0fe3188d3c.pdf [Google Scholar]
  8. Dąbrowski, W., Żyłka, R. and Malinowski, P., 2017. Evaluation of energy consumption during aerobic sewage sludge treatment in dairy wastewater treatment plant. Environmental research, 153, pp.135–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ekholm, J., de Blois, M., Persson, F., Gustavsson, D.J., Bengtsson, S., van Erp, T. and Wilén, B.M., 2023. Case study of aerobic granular sludge and activated sludge—Energy usage, footprint, and nutrient removal. Water Environment Research, 95(8), p.e10914. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10914 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fawzy, S., Osman, A.I., Doran, J. and Rooney, D.W., 2020. Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 18, pp.2069–2094 [Google Scholar]
  11. Abbass, K., Qasim, M.Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H. and Younis, I., 2022. A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(28), pp.42539–42559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6 [Google Scholar]
  12. NOAA National Centers for Environmental information, Climate at a Glance: Global Time Series, published July 2024, retrieved on July 16, 2024 from https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series [Google Scholar]
  13. Metcalf & Eddy, Burton, F.L., Stensel, H.D., Tchobanoglous, G., 2003. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, Fifth Edition. McGraw Hill. New York [Google Scholar]
  14. Rajesh, M. and Rehana, S., 2022. Impact of climate change on river water temperature and dissolved oxygen: Indian riverine thermal regimes. Scientific Reports, 12(1), p.9222. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12996-7 [Google Scholar]
  15. Walczyńska, A. and Sobczyk, Ł., 2017. The underestimated role of temperature–oxygen relationship in large ‐ scale studies on size ‐ to ‐ temperature response. Ecology and Evolution, 7(18), pp.7434–7441. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3263 [Google Scholar]
  16. Patel, A., Arkatkar, A., Singh, S., Rabbani, A., Medina, J.D.S., Ong, E.S., Habashy, M.M., Jadhav, D.A., Rene, E.R., Mungray, A.A. and Mungray, A.K., 2021. Physico-chemical and biological treatment strategies for converting municipal wastewater and its residue to resources. Chemosphere, 282, p.130881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130881 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bartha, C., Tókos, A., Jipa, M., Caramitu, A., Voina, A., Circiumaru, G., Micu, D.D. and Lingvay, I., 2023. Saving Energy in Biological Wastewater Treatment by Using Extremely Low-Frequency Electric Field—Pilot-Scale Study. Sustainability, 15(15), p.11670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511670 [Google Scholar]
  18. Aghabalaei, V., Nayeb, H., Mardani, S., Tabeshnia, M. and Baghdadi, M., 2023. Minimizing greenhouse gases emissions and energy consumption from wastewater treatment plants via rational design and engineering strategies: A case study in Mashhad, Iran. Energy Reports, 9, pp.2310–2320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.017 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bertanza, G., Baroni, P., Garzetti, S. and Martinelli, F., 2021. Reducing energy demand by the combined application of advanced control strategies in a full scale WWTP. Water Science and Technology, 83(8), pp.1813–1823. [Google Scholar]
  20. APHA. 2012. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation [Google Scholar]
  21. Muloiwa, M., Dinka, M.O. and Nyende-Byakika, S., 2023. Impact of temperature and airflow rate on the removal of organic pollutants and inorganic pollutants in the biological treatment process. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 43(1), pp.245–256. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejcchemeng-v43-n1-a22 [Google Scholar]
  22. Balku, Ş., 2018. Influence of temperature on activated sludge systems. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, 14(1), pp.77–80. DOI: 10.18466/cbayarfbe.357348 [Google Scholar]
  23. Pawlita-Posmyk, M., Wzorek, M. and Płaczek, M., 2018. The influence of temperature on algal biomass growth for biogas production. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 240, p. 04008). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824004008 [Google Scholar]
  24. Alisawi. H.A.O. 2020. Performance of wastewater treatment during variable temperature. Applied Water Science. 10(4). pp.1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-1171-x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ricci, S., Pinette, M.G., Wax, J.R., Craig, W., Forrest, L. and Dragoni, C., 2020. The effect of temperature on bacterial growth in the presence of nonsterile ultrasound coupling gel. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 222(2), p.188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cao, H. and Zhang, X., 2023, January. An image stitching algorithm with improved Sigmoid function weights. In International Conference on Optical and Photonic Engineering (icOPEN 2022) (Vol. 12550, pp. 276–281). SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2666584 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.