EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 648 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 648 (2025) 01002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 648, 2025
International Conference on Civil, Environmental and Applied Sciences (ICCEAS 2025)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 14
Section Civil Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564801002
Published online 08 September 2025
  1. D. Adjidjonu and J. Burgett, Assessing the Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Photogrammetric Survey, IJCER, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 85–96, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2020.1717683 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ł. Marchel, C. Specht, and M. Specht, Assessment of the Steering Precision of a Hydrographic USV along Sounding Profiles Using a High-Precision GNSS RTK Receiver Supported Autopilot, Energies, vol. 13, no. 21, (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13215637 [Google Scholar]
  3. E. N. Arroyo-Suarez, J. L. Riley, G. F. Glang, and D. L. Mabey, Evaluating a global differential GPS system for hydrographic surveying, in Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE, 3, 2557-2563, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2005.1640155 [Google Scholar]
  4. L. H. Pitcher et al., Advancing Field-Based GNSS Surveying for Validation of Remotely Sensed Water Surface Elevation Products, Frontiers in Earth Science, 8, 278, (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00278 [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Hofer, G. Strauß, K. Koulechov, and A. Dietz, Definition of accuracy and precision —evaluating CAS-systems, International Congress Series, 1281, 548–552, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.03.290 [Google Scholar]
  6. Khalil, R., The Accuracy of GIS Tools for Transforming Assumed Total Station Surveys to Real World Coordinates. Journal of Geographic Information System, 5, 486-491, (2013). https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2013.55045 [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Varbla, R. Puust, and A. Ellmann, Accuracy assessment of RTK-GNSS equipped UAV conducted as-built surveys for construction site modelling, Survey Review, vol. 53, 381, 477–492, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2020.1830544 [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Kumar, S. Chaudhary, G. Shukla, and S. Kumar, Assessment of Positional Accuracy of DGPS: A Case Study of Indian School of Mines Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India, IJAES, 2, 1–7, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  9. M. N. Ono, E.S. O., and O. O. F., Comparative Analysis of DGPS and Total Station Accuracies for Static Deformation Monitoring Of Engineering Structures, IOSR-JESTFT, 12, 19–29, (2018). https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-1206011929 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Harwin and A. Lucieer, Assessing the Accuracy of Georeferenced Point Clouds Produced via Multi-View Stereopsis from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery, Remote Sensing, 4, 1573–1599, (2012). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4061573 [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Amirthavarshini., Vasanthakumar, and M. R. Kannan, Evaluation of Land Surveying and Mapping using Total Station, GPS and GIS, IJERT, 7, 11, (2019). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:213862458 [Google Scholar]
  12. I. Asma, T. Ibraheem, Z. Mahdi, and I. Thikranajah, Comparison Between The Use of Modern and Old Surveying Equipment Through The Updating of Digital Maps, IJARET, 5, 37-42, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Scaioni, R. Perko, and M. R. Veronez, Applications of surveying in land management, Earth Science Informatics, 7, 69–70, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-014-0162-6 [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Gao, X. Shen, and M. Abdel-Salam, Global Differential GPS Positioning without Using a Base Station, Geographic Information Sciences, 8, 9–15, (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/10824000209480568 [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Wu, J. Zhu, Z. Yu, J. Zhuge, and B. Xue, A total station spatial positioning method based on rotary laser scanning and ultrasonic ranging, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 87, 115104, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4966982 [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Lastilla, R. Ravanelli, and M. Crespi, First test of agisoft metashape satellite image processing for DSM generation: A case study in Trento with pléiades imagery, IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 897–900, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS39084.2020.9323197 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.