Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 648, 2025
International Conference on Civil, Environmental and Applied Sciences (ICCEAS 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02013 | |
| Number of page(s) | 9 | |
| Section | Environmental Sciences | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564802013 | |
| Published online | 08 September 2025 | |
- B. H. Nam, S. Choi, T. Copeland, and Y. J. Kim, "Social Vulnerability and Geohazards: Review and Implications," in Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol. 51, Cham: Springer, pp. 3–37 (2023). doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-24541-1_1. [Google Scholar]
- Asian Development Bank, ADB Climate Change Programs: Facilitating Integrated Solutions in Asia and the Pacific. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/adb-climate-change-programs-brochure.pdf [Accessed: May 3, 2025]. [Google Scholar]
- H. Irin and M. Ashekur,“Cyclone and Bangladesh: A Historical and Environmental Overview from 1582 to 2020,” International Medical Journal, vol. 25, no. 06, pp. 2595–2614, (2020). [Google Scholar]
- Department of Disaster Management, Bangladesh (DDM), Department of Disaster Management. [Online]. Available: https://ddm.gov.bd/. [Accessed: Apr. 25, 2025]. [Google Scholar]
- Department of Agricultural Extension, Bangladesh (DAE), Department of Agricultural Extension. [Online]. Available: https://dae.gov.bd/. [Accessed: Apr. 27, 2025]. [Google Scholar]
- J. C. Rodgers, A. W. Murrah, and W. H. Cooke,“The impact of Hurricane Katrina on the coastal vegetation of the Weeks Bay Reserve, Alabama from NDVI data,” Estuaries and Coasts, vol. 32, pp. 496–507, (2009). [Google Scholar]
- L. Di, E. Yu, R. Shrestha, and L. Lin, "DVDI: A new remotely sensed index for measuring vegetation damage caused by natural disasters," in Proc. Int. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. (IGARSS), Jul. (2018), pp. 9067–9069. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8518022. [Google Scholar]
- X. Chen et al.,“Post-typhoon forest damage estimation using multiple vegetation indices and machine learning models,” Weather and Climate Extremes, vol. 38, p. 100494, (2022). doi: 10.1016/J.WACE.2022.100494. [Google Scholar]
- R. Subhani, S. E. Saqib, M. A. Rahman, M. M. Ahmad, and S. Pradit,“Impact of Cyclone YAAS 2021 aggravated by COVID-19 pandemic in the southwest coastal zone of Bangladesh,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 23, p. 13324, (2021). doi: 10.3390/SU132313324. [Google Scholar]
- A. M. Carrington et al.,“Deep ROC analysis and AUC as balanced average accuracy, for improved classifier selection, audit and explanation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 329–341, (2022). doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3153406. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Feng, R. I. Negron-Juárez, and J. Q. Chambers,“Remote sensing and statistical analysis of the effects of Hurricane María on the forests of Puerto Rico,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 247, p. 111940, (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111940. [Google Scholar]
- Q. Zhang, Z. Wu, and P. Tarolli,“Investigating the role of green infrastructure on urban waterlogging: Evidence from metropolitan coastal cities,” Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 12, p. 2341, (2021). [Google Scholar]
- Y. Yu et al.,“Disturbance types play a key role in post-disturbance vegetation recovery in boreal forests of Northeast China,” Ecol. Indic., vol. 168, p. 112745, (2024). [Google Scholar]
- H. Niwa, M. Kamada, S. Morisada, and M. Ogawa,“Assessing the impact of storm surge flooding on coastal pine forests using a vegetation index,” Landscape and Ecological Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 151–159, (2023). [Google Scholar]
- Y. Liu, F. Wang, F. Ji, L. Zhang, J. Zhao, C. Zheng, and J. Chen,“The response characteristics and stability evaluation of vegetated slope under strong wind,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 29045, (2024). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.