Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 650, 2025
The 10th International Conference on Energy, Environment, and Information Systems (ICENIS 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01017 | |
| Number of page(s) | 9 | |
| Section | Energy | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565001017 | |
| Published online | 10 October 2025 | |
- B. Susanto et al., “Characterization of sago tree parts from Sentani, Papua, Indonesia for biomass energy utilization,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 1, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Tangke Tosuli, Cahyadi, H. Dafiqurrohman, R. Hermawan, and A. Surjosatyo, “Gasification of sago dreg waste in a top-lit updraft fixed bed gasifier: Syngas composition and its effect with additional Al2O3 as catalyst,” Energy Convers. Manag. X, vol. 24, no. November, p. 100775, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100775. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Tangke Tosuli, Cahyadi, H. Dafiqurrohman, R. Hermawan, and A. Surjosatyo, “Gasification of sago dreg waste in a top-lit updraft fixed bed gasifier: Syngas composition and its effect with additional Al2O3 as catalyst,” Energy Convers. Manag. X, vol. 24, no. November, p. 100775, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100775. [Google Scholar]
- J. Gupta, M. Kumari, A. Mishra, Swati, M. Akram, and I. S. Thakur, “Agro-forestry waste management-A review,” Chemosphere, vol. 287, no. P3, p. 132321, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132321. [Google Scholar]
- S. Mishra and R. K. Upadhyay, “Review on biomass gasification: Gasifiers, gasifying mediums, and operational parameters,” Mater. Sci. Energy Technol., vol. 4, pp. 329–340, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.mset.2021.08.009. [Google Scholar]
- U. K. Pata, “Do renewable energy and health expenditures improve load capacity factor in the USA and Japan? A new approach to environmental issues,” Eur. J. Heal. Econ., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1427–1439, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Y. T. Tosuli, Cahyadi, H. Dafiqurrohman, R. Hermawan, and A. Surjosatyo, “Enhancing hydrogen content in syngas from sago bagasse gasification using Al2O3 catalyst,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 136, no. February, pp. 60–66, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.061. [Google Scholar]
- S. Verma et al., “Reaction engineering during biomass gasification and conversion to energy,” Energy, vol. 266, no. December 2022, p. 126458, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126458. [Google Scholar]
- D. A. Quintero-Coronel, Y. A. Lenis-Rodas, L. A. Corredor, P. Perreault, and A. Gonzalez-Quiroga, “Thermochemical conversion of coal and biomass blends in a top-lit updraft fixed bed reactor: Experimental assessment of the ignition front propagation velocity,” Energy, vol. 220, p. 119702, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119702. [Google Scholar]
- A. M. James R., C. Castorena, and W. Yuan, “Modeling Product Distribution of Top-lit Updraft Gasification,” BioResources, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 6629–6642, 2021, doi: 10.15376/biores.16.4.6629-6642. [Google Scholar]
- K. De La Hoz C and W. A. Gonzalez, “Energy performance and variability of an improved top-lit updraft biomass cookstove under a water boiling test protocol,” Energy Sources, Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff., pp. 1–20, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- A. H. Asfaw, “Development and Performance Analysis of Top Lit-Updraft-Natural Draft Gasifier Stoves with Various Feed Stocks, and Correlation of Gasifier Stove Efficiency with Charcoal End Production,” Available SSRN 3969707, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- A. Hailu, “Development and performance analysis of top lit updraft: natural draft gasifier stoves with various feed stocks,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 8, p. e10163, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10163. [Google Scholar]
- M. Di Salvo and M. Wei, “Synthesis of natural gas from thermochemical and power-to-gas pathways for industrial sector decarbonization in California,” Energy, vol. 182, pp. 1250–1264, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.212. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.