Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 650, 2025
The 10th International Conference on Energy, Environment, and Information Systems (ICENIS 2025)
Article Number 02017
Number of page(s) 12
Section Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565002017
Published online 10 October 2025
  1. A. Sonwai, P. Pholchan, and N. Tippayawong, “Machine learning approach for determining and optimizing influential factors of biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 383, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129235. [Google Scholar]
  2. Angelina, C. M. Tahara, M. Audrey, T. Evelyne, V. Y. San, and E. Rukmini, “Community education approaches for food waste reduction in Indonesia: A systematic review,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1324, no. 1, p. 012113, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012113. [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Biswal, K. P. Shadangi, and P. K. Sarangi, “Application of Nanotechnology in the Production of Biohydrogen: A Review,” Chemical Engineering and Technology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 218–233, 2023, doi: 10.1002/ceat.202000565. [Google Scholar]
  4. L. J. Martínez-Mendoza, R. Lebrero, R. Muñoz, and O. García-Depraect, “Influence of key operational parameters on biohydrogen production from fruit and vegetable waste via lactate-driven dark fermentation,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 364, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128070. [Google Scholar]
  5. R. F. Tiegam Tagne, P. Costa, S. Casella, and L. Favaro, “Optimization of biohydrogen production by dark fermentation of African food-processing waste streams,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 49, pp. 266–276, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.348. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Domińska, “The Influence of Inoculum Source and Pretreatment on the Biohydrogen Production in the Dark Fermentation Process,” Chemical and Process Engineering New Frontiers, pp. 63–63, 2024, doi: 10.24425/cpe.2024.149458. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Panin, W. Setthapun, A. A. Elizabeth Sinsuw, H. Sintuya, and C.-Y. Chu, “Biohydrogen and biogas production from mashed and powdered vegetable residues by an enriched microflora in dark fermentation,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 27, pp. 14073–14082, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.246. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Vázquez-López and I. Moreno-Andrade, “Biohydrogen production by co-digestion of food waste and corn industry wastewater,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.03.315. [Google Scholar]
  9. J.-Y. Nam, “Optimum Conditions for Enhanced Biohydrogen Production from a Mixture of Food Waste and Sewage Sludge with Alkali Pretreatment,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16073281. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Hangri et al., “Combining pretreatments and co-fermentation as successful approach to improve biohydrogen production from dairy cow manure,” Environmental Research, vol. 246, p. 118118, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118118. [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Villanueva-Galindo, M. Pérez-Rangel, and I. Moreno-Andrade, “Biohydrogen production from lactic acid: Use of food waste as substrate and evaluation of pretreated sludge and native microbial community as inoculum,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.202. [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Kim, H. Yang, J. Lee, and K.-S. Cho, “Comparative analysis of hydrogen production and bacterial communities in mesophilic and thermophilic consortia using multiple inoculum sources,” Chemosphere, vol. 350, p. 141144, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141144. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Cao et al., “Potato peel waste for fermentative biohydrogen production using different pretreated culture,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 362, p. 127866, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127866. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Rodríguez-Valderrama, C. Escamilla-Alvarado, J.-P. Magnin, P. Rivas-García, I. Valdez-Vazquez, and E. Ríos-Leal, “Batch biohydrogen production from dilute acid hydrolyzates of fruits-and-vegetables wastes and corn stover as co-substrates,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 140, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105666. [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Dauptain, E. Trably, G. Santa-Catalina, N. Bernet, and H. Carrere, “Role of indigenous bacteria in dark fermentation of organic substrates,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 313, p. 123665, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123665. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.