Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 650, 2025
The 10th International Conference on Energy, Environment, and Information Systems (ICENIS 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02021 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| Section | Environment | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565002021 | |
| Published online | 10 October 2025 | |
- C. Mao, Q. Shen, W. Pan, and K. Ye, “Major barriers to off-site construction: The developer’s perspective in China,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 31, no. 3, p. 4014043, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- M. Kamali, K. Hewage, and R. Sadiq, “Conventional versus modular construction methods: A comparative cradle-to-gate LCA for residential buildings,” Energy Build., vol. 204, p. 109479, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. M. Kamar, Z. Abd Hamid, and N. A. Azman, “Industrialized building system (IBS): Revisiting issues of definition and classification,” Int. J. Emerg. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 120, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- O. Cf, “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” United Nations, New York, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- M. F. Musa, M. R. Yusof, M. F. Mohammad, R. Mahbub, S. Alam, and F. Com, “Characteristics of modular construction: meeting the needs of sustainability and innovation,” in Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering, 2014, pp. 216–221. [Google Scholar]
- C. Goodier and A. Gibb, “Future opportunities for offsite in the UK,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 585–595, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- R. E. Smith, Prefab architecture: A guide to modular design and construction. John Wiley & Sons, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- M. B. Institute, “Modular Advantage for the Commercial Modular Construction Industry: The Offsite Construction Issue.” Modular Building Institute’s Quarterly Publication Toronto, ON, Canada, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- H. Hakim and T. Endangsih, “The application of green building concept through fabrication modular construction system in special house construction,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 12033. [Google Scholar]
- S. S. Muthu, Assessing the environmental impact of textiles and the clothing supply chain. Woodhead publishing, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- J. Monahan and J. C. Powell, “An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study using a lifecycle assessment framework,” Energy Build., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 179–188, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Hammond, C. Jones, E. F. Lowrie, and P. Tse, “Embodied carbon,” Invent. carbon energy (ICE). Version, vol. 16, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- V. Tavares, N. Lacerda, and F. Freire, “Embodied energy and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of a prefabricated modular house: The ‘Moby’ case study,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 212, pp. 1044–1053, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Pervez, Y. Ali, and A. Petrillo, “A quantitative assessment of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from conventional and modular construction: A case of developing country,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 294, p. 126210, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.