Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 652, 2025
2nd International Conference on Sustainable Environment and Disaster Management (2nd SUSTAIN 2025)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Biodiversity – Conservation & Restoration
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565201003
Published online 15 October 2025
  1. N. Firdaus, Supriatna, and J. Supriatna, “Ecosystem services research trends in Indonesia: a bibliometric analysis,” Biodiversitas, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1105–1117, 2022, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d230255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Sanka et al., “Synthetic biology in Indonesia: Potential and projection in a country with mega biodiversity,” Biotechnol. Notes, vol. 4, no. December 2022, pp. 41–48, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.biotno.2023.02.002. [Google Scholar]
  3. UNESCO, “Statutes of the International Geoscience and Geoparks Programme,” UNESCO Program. Meet. Doc., p. IGGP/2015/ST, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260675.page=1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Yanuar, Z. Anna, P. Hindayani, M. F. Rosana, Z. Zulfiadi, and A. Sudradjat, “Prospective Analysis of Sustainable Development Strategy of Geopark Tourism of Ciletuh-Palabuhanratu West Java Indonesia,” Int. J. Curr. Innov. Res., vol. 4, no. 2(a), pp. 1033–1039, 2018, doi: 10.24327/IJCIR. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. I. Pulido-Fernández and Y. López-Sánchez, “Are tourists really willing to pay more for sustainable destinations?,” Sustain., vol. 8, no. 12, 2016, doi: 10.3390/su8121240. [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Rahmafitria, V. Sukmayadi, and H. Purboyo, “The Real and Actual Tourism Accessibility in Protected Areas,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 501, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/501/1/012047. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Stefanica, C. B. Sandu, G. I. Butnaru, and A. P. Haller, “The nexus between tourism activities and environmental degradation: Romanian tourists’ opinions,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 16, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13169210. [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Aziza, E. K. S. Harini Muntasib, and R. Hermawan, “Impact of Tourism Activity in Ciletuh-Palabuhanratu Geopark (Cpg), Sukabumi, West Java,” Media Konserv., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2023, doi: 10.29244/medkon.28.1.43-50. [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Jurado-Rivas and M. Sánchez-Rivero, “Investigating Change in the Willingness to Pay for a More Sustainable Tourist Destination in a World Heritage City,” Land, vol. 11, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.3390/land11030439. [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Hindayani, A. S. Bratanegara, and A. R. Pratama, “Willingness To Pay (WTP) Wisatawan dalam Pelestarian Lingkungan Paska Perubahan Cagar Alam Kamojang ke Taman Wisata Alam Kamojang,” Ilmu Lingkung., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 2024, doi: 10.14710/jil.22.1.43-49. [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Witt, “Tourists’willingness to pay increased entrance fees at Mexican protected areas: A multi-site contingent valuation study,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 11, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11113041. [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Boto-García, P. Mariel, J. B. Pino, and A. Alvarez, “Tourists’ willingness to pay for holiday trip characteristics: A Discrete Choice Experiment,” Tour. Econ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 349–370, 2022, doi: 10.1177/1354816620959901. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Maynard, D. James, and A. Davidson, “The development of an ecosystem services framework for South East Queensland,” Environ. Manage., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 881–895, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9428-z. [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Ambarwati, D. Hastuti, and L. R. Wijayanti Faida, “Carrying Capacity Based on Ecosystem Services for Biodiversity Conservation in the Petungkriyono Essential Ecosystem Area Candidate,” J. Ilmu Kehutan., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 96–105, 2023, doi: 10.22146/jik.v17i1.5762. [Google Scholar]
  15. F. Rahmafitria, H. P. H. Putro, A. Rosyidie, P. Dirgahayani, H. P. D. Setiyorini, and G. R. Nurazizah, “Navigating Conservation Access: Unraveling Ignorant Tourist Behavior and Typologies in Komodo National Park,” J. Manaj. Hutan Trop., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 237–245, 2024, doi: 10.7226/jtfm.30.2.237. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.