Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 652, 2025
2nd International Conference on Sustainable Environment and Disaster Management (2nd SUSTAIN 2025)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 10
Section ESG, Circular Transition & Clean Energy Adoption
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565203001
Published online 15 October 2025
  1. H. V. Van, N. M. Nguyen, M. Abu Afifa, D. T. T. Vo, and D. Van Bui, “Sustainability reporting quality and firm value in ASEAN+ 3: A series moderation model,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 2207–2224, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3059. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. J. Rahman, T. Rana, H. Zhu, and Z. Dongying, “Factors Influencing Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Medicine Manufacturing Industry in China,” in Carbon Accounting for Sustainability and Environmental Management, Routledge, 2025, pp. 166–182. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Y. Perdana, A. K. Widagdo, and S. R. Ika, “Governance Attributes Driving Sustainability Reporting in Indonesia’s Mining Industry,” in E3S Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 2024, p. 15001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459315001. [Google Scholar]
  4. T. T. Nu, N. T. T. Hai, L. T. T. Huong, and D. T. N. Lan, “Factors Influencing the Disclosure of Sustainability Reports By Listed Companies on the Vietnamese Stock Market,” Financ. Credit Act. Probl. Theory Pract., vol. 2, no. 61, pp. 265–281, 2025, doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.2.61.2025.4707. [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Dissanayake, S. Dissanayake, and R. Ajward, “Do attainment discrepancy and slacks moderate the relationship between board characteristics and level of sustainability disclosure?,” Corp. Gov. Sustain. Rev., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 28–44, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv5i4p3. [Google Scholar]
  6. N. A. Shafai and H. Abd-Mutalib, “Ownership structures and sustainability reporting of Malaysian listed companies,” J. Pengur., vol. 70, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.17576/pengurusan-2024-70-2. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Osei, “Exploring the governance–digital transformation nexus: empirical evidence on sustainability reporting using 2SLS, LSDV models, heterogeneity effects, and cluster analysis,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2491686, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2491686. [Google Scholar]
  8. R. B. Adomako, P. B. Boakye, and A. Salapki, “Tech-driven governance for sustainability: enhancing environmental disclosure through corporate governance and innovation in emerging market,” SN Bus. Econ., vol. 5, no. 7, p. 86, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-025-00852-5. [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Del Gesso and R. N. Lodhi, “Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: a systematic review of accounting studies,” J. Account. Lit., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 433–461, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-08-2023-0143. [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Gezgin, G. Özer, A. K. Merter, and Y. S. Balcıoğlu, “The mediating role of corporate governance in the relationship between net profit and equity and voluntary disclosure in the context of legitimacy theory,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 10, p. 4097, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104097. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Alshaiba and B. Abu Khalaf, “The impact of board gender diversity on the Gulf Cooperation Council’s reporting on sustainable development goals,” 2024, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cbv20i1art3. [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Aladwey, A. Elgharbawy, and M. A. Ganna, “Attributes of corporate boards and assurance of corporate social responsibility reporting: evidence from the UK,” Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 748–780, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2021-0066. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Alta’any, V. Tauringana, A. Zalata, and L. O. Achiro, “Unpacking sustainability reporting dimensions: the impact of board characteristics,” J. Financ. Report. Account., no. ahead-of-print, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-09-2023-0568. [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Nuhu and A. Alam, “Ownership structure and sustainability reporting: emerging economies evidence,” Int. J. Account. Inf. Manag., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 883–908, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2023-0228. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Arieftiara, S. Widyastuti, M. Masripah, M. Miftah, and S. Wijaya, “The Role of Largest Ownership Structure in ESG Reporting, Tax Avoidance, and Firm Value: Evidence from Emerging Markets,” Qubahan Acad. J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 293–321, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n2a1682. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.