Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 652, 2025
2nd International Conference on Sustainable Environment and Disaster Management (2nd SUSTAIN 2025)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 18
Section ESG, Circular Transition & Clean Energy Adoption
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565203004
Published online 15 October 2025
  1. IEA Data and Statistics; 2020; [Google Scholar]
  2. Dornburg, V.; van Vuuren, D.; van de Ven, G.; Langeveld, H.; Meeusen, M.; Banse, M.; van Oorschot, M.; Ros, J.; Jan van den Born, G.; Aiking, H.; et al. Bioenergy Revisited: Key Factors in Global Potentials of Bioenergy. Energy Environ Sci 2010, 3, 258, doi:10.1039/b922422j. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhao, G. Assessment of Potential Biomass Energy Production in China towards 2030 and 2050. International Journal of Sustainable Energy 2018, 37, 47–66, doi:10.1080/14786451.2016.1231677. [Google Scholar]
  4. Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W.M. How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines. J Bus Res 2021, 133, 285–296, doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mengist, W.; Soromessa, T.; Legese, G. Ecosystem Services Research in Mountainous Regions: A Systematic Literature Review on Current Knowledge and Research Gaps. Science of the Total Environment 2020, 702. [Google Scholar]
  6. Huff, E.S.; Mittlefehldt, S.; Bunting, E.; Welsh, J. Attitudes and Perceptions of Wood Energy Technologies in the Great Lakes Region, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 2023, 176, 106897, doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106897. [Google Scholar]
  7. Qazi, A.; Bhowmik, C.; Hussain, F.; Yang, S.; Naseem, U.; Adebayo, A.A.; Gumaei, A.; Al-Rakhami, M. Analyzing the Public Opinion as a Guide for Renewable-Energy Status in Malaysia: A Case Study. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 2023, 70, 371–385, doi:10.1109/TEM.2020.3046749. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991, 50, 179–211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis, F.D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q 1989, 13, 319–340, doi:10.5962/bhl.title.33621. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis, F.D.; Granić, A. Evolution of TAM. 2024, 19–57, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-45274-2_2. [Google Scholar]
  11. Saari, U.A.; Damberg, S.; Frömbling, L.; Ringle, C.M. Sustainable Consumption Behavior of Europeans: The Influence of Environmental Knowledge and Risk Perception on Environmental Concern and Behavioral Intention. Ecological Economics 2021, 189, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107155. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behavior: Frequently Asked Questions. Hum Behav Emerg Technol 2020, 2, 314–324, doi:10.1002/hbe2.195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gumasing, Ma.J.J.; Bayola, A.; Bugayong, S.L.; Cantona, K.R. Determining the Factors Affecting Filipinos’ Acceptance of the Use of Renewable Energies: A Pro-Environmental Planned Behavior Model. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7702, doi:10.3390/su15097702. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liobikienė, G.; Dagiliūtė, R.; Juknys, R. The Determinants of Renewable Energy Usage Intentions Using Theory of Planned Behaviour Approach. Renew Energy 2021, 170, 587–594, doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.152. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bosnjak, M.; Ajzen, I.; Schmidt, P. The Theory of Planned Behavior: Selected Recent Advances and Applications. Eur J Psychol 2020, 16, 352–356, doi:10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.