Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 652, 2025
2nd International Conference on Sustainable Environment and Disaster Management (2nd SUSTAIN 2025)
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 15
Section Disaster Risk Reduction, Hazard Detection & Spatial Vulnerability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565204003
Published online 15 October 2025
  1. A. M. Asbi, D. Mardiatno, and D. Ruslanjari, “Tsunami hazard area zonation using run- up modeling in the coastal area of Bandar Lampung City,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1479, no. 1, p. 012007, 2025, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1479/1/012007. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Vicuña, J. León, and S. Guzmán, “Urban form planning and tsunami risk vulnerability: Analysis of 12 Chilean coastal cities,” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci., vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1967–1979, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221075635 [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Woessner and R. J. Farahani, “Tsunami inundation hazard across Japan,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 49, p. 101654, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101654 [Google Scholar]
  4. H. A. Vardar et al., “Scenario-based tsunami hazard assessment for the northwestern coast of Marmara Sea,” Geo-Mar. Lett., vol. 43, no. 3, p. 12, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-023-00752-3 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. K. Kondarathi et al., “Tsunami modeling for a possible tsunamigenic earthquake from the 1762 Arakan source region and its effect along the South Andaman Coast,” J. Geol. Soc. India, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 866–871, 2025, https://doi.org/10.17491/jgsi/2025/174175 [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Tufekci-Enginar, M. L. Suzen, and A. C. Yalciner, “The evaluation of public awareness and community preparedness parameter in GIS-based spatial tsunami human vulnerability assessment (MeTHuVA),” Nat. Hazards, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 2639–2658, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04416-8 [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Cugliari, A. Cerase, and A. Amato, “Tsunami risk perception, a state-of-the-art review with a focus in the NEAM region,” Front. Earth Sci., vol. 10, p. 995536, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.995536 [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Salah and J. Sasaki, “Knowledge, awareness, and attitudes toward tsunamis: A local survey in the southern coast of Iran,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 449, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020449 [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Dhellemmes et al., “Tsunami awareness and preparedness in Aotearoa New Zealand: The evolution of community understanding,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 65, p. 102576, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102576 [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Wood et al., “Multi-hazard risk analysis for the US Department of the Interior: an integration of expert elicitation, planning priorities, and geospatial analysis,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 82, p. 103385, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103385 [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Alwi and B. W. Mutaqin, “Geospatial mapping of tsunami susceptibility in Parangtritis coastal area of Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” Arab. J. Geosci., vol. 15, no. 15, p. 1332, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10608-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Biswas and A. Sil, “Tsunami vulnerability assessment and multi-criteria decision making analysis of Eastern Coast of India using GIS-based tools,” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1270–1287, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-1493-y [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Biswas and A. Sil, “Tsunami vulnerability assessment using GIS and AHP technique for Southern Coastal Region of India,” Nat. Hazards Rev., vol. 25, no. 3, p. 04024019, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1594 [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Usman et al., “Assessing coastal population capacity in tsunami-prone areas: A grid-based approach,” Jàmbá: J. Disaster Risk Stud., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2024, https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1685 [Google Scholar]
  15. Z. Hidayah, N. N. Rohmah, and M. K. Wardhani, “Coastal vulnerability study on potential impact of tsunami and community resilience in Pacitan Bay East Java,” Forum Geogr., vol. 36, no. 1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.23917/forgeo.v36i1.17160 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.