EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 654 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 654 (2025) 03006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 654, 2025
Energy and Sustainability Conference (ESC2025)
Article Number 03006
Number of page(s) 7
Section Green Finance and Business
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565403006
Published online 21 October 2025
  1. Olabode E. Ogunmakinde, “The Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: From Research to Practice”, Journal of Circular Economy 2 (2024), no. 3. https://doi.org/10.55845/DHNN3429. [Google Scholar]
  2. Clarence P. Ginga, Jason Maximino C. Ongpeng and Ma Klarissa M. Daly, “Circular Economy on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Material Recovery and Production”, Materials 13 (2020), no. 13, p. 2970. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13132970. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Tianqi Liu, Lin Chen, Mingyu Yang, Malindu Sandanayake, Pengyun Miao, Yang Shi and Pow-Seng Yap, “Sustainability Considerations of Green Buildings: A Detailed Overview on Current Advancements and Future Considerations”, Sustainability 14 (2022), no. 21, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tuomo Joensuu, “Circular economy practices in the built environment”, Journal of Cleaner Production 276 (2020), no. 124215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124215. [Google Scholar]
  5. Urszula Kozminska, “Circular design: reused materials and the future reuse of building elements in architecture. Process, challenges and case studies”, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 225 (2019), no. 1, p. 012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012033. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rand Askar, Luís Bragança and Helena Gervásio, “Design for Adaptability (DfA)— Frameworks and Assessment Models for Enhanced Circularity in Buildings”, Applied System Innovation 5 (2022), no. 1, p. 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5010024. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mahadev Bera, Sumanta Das, Sourav Garai, Suman Dutta, Malini Roy Choudhury, Sudipta Tripathi and Gautam Chatterjee, “Advancing energy efficiency: innovative technologies and strategic measures for achieving net zero emissions”, Carbon Footprints 4 (2025), no. 1. https://doi.org/10.20517/cf.2024.48. [Google Scholar]
  8. David Pearlmutter, Dimitra Theochari, Thomas Nehls, Pedro Pinho, Patrizia Piro, Alisa Korolova, Spiros Papaefthimiou, Mari Carmen Garcia Mateo, Cristina Calheiros, Irene Zluwa, Ulrike Pitha, Paul Schosseler, Yaakov Florentin, Shahar Ouannou, Erez Gal, Andreas Aicher, Killian Arnold, Erika Igondová and Bernhard Pucher, “Enhancing the circular economy with nature-based solutions in the built urban environment: green building materials, systems and sites”, Blue-Green Systems 2 (2019), no. 1, pp. 46–72. https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2019.928. [Google Scholar]
  9. Alexander Koutamanis, “From Building Information Modelling to Digital Twins: Digital Representation for a Circular Economy” in A Circular Built Environment in the Digital Age (Catherine De Wolf et al., eds.), Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2024, pp. 3–20. Online at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39675-5_1 (accessed April 15, 2025). [Google Scholar]
  10. Janaine Fernanda Gaelzer Timm, Vinícius Gonçalves Maciel and Ana Passuello, “Towards Sustainable Construction: A Systematic Review of Circular Economy Strategies and Ecodesign in the Built Environment”, Buildings 13 (2023), no. 8, p. 2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082059. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mayara Regina Munaro, Sergio Fernando Tavares and Luís Bragança, “The ecodesign methodologies to achieve buildings’ deconstruction: A review and framework”, Sustainable Production and Consumption 30 (2022), pp. 566–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.032. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mitchell Jones, Andreas Mautner, Stefano Luenco, Alexander Bismarck and Sabu John, “Engineered mycelium composite construction materials from fungal biorefineries: A critical review”, Materials & Design 187 (2020), p. 108397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108397. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nima Asghari and Ali M. Memari, “State of the Art Review of Attributes and Mechanical Properties of Hempcrete”, Biomass 4 (2024), no. 1, pp. 65–91. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4010004. [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Heisel, D.E. Hebel and W. Sobek, “Resource-respectful construction – the case of the Urban Mining and Recycling unit (UMAR)”, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 225 (2019), p. 012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012049. [Google Scholar]
  15. Felix Heisel and Sabine Rau-Oberhuber, “Calculation and evaluation of circularity indicators for the built environment using the case studies of UMAR and Madaster”, Journal of Cleaner Production 243 (2020), p. 118482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118482. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.