EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 656 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 656 (2025) 01003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 656, 2025
2025 6th International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science (ICUEMS 2025)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Urban Infrastructure and Safety
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565601003
Published online 30 October 2025
  1. "EPA PROHIBITS USE OF DIAZINON ON GOLF COURSES AND SOD FARMS". Deseret News. 31 March 1988. Retrieved 3 July 2023. [Google Scholar]
  2. Golf and the Environment (pdf) https://www.auduboninternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/GE-Golf-and-the-Environment.pdf. Retrieved 01 May 2025. [Google Scholar]
  3. EnviroLogic Resources, Inc. " Environmental Stewardship Guidelines: Best Management Practices for Washington Golf Courses " (2020). [Google Scholar]
  4. Uyan, Mevlut. "GIS-based solar farms site selection using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Karapinar region, Konya/Turkey." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 28 (2013): 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nguyen, Thu, Thi, et, al. "Cooling effects of urban vegetation: the role of golf courses." Remote Sensing 14.17 (2022): 4351. [Google Scholar]
  6. White, C. LeAnn, and Main, Martin B. "Wildlife in Urban Landscapes: Use of Golf Course Ponds by Wetlands Birds: WEC 188/UW207, 12/2004." EDIS 2005.1 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  7. https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/geospatial-platform/overview. Retrieved 04 May 2025. [Google Scholar]
  8. Rikalovic, Aleksandar, Ilija Cosic, and Djordje Lazarevic. "GIS based multi-criteria analysis for industrial site selection." Procedia engineering 69 (2014): 1054–1063. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bahrani, Sara, et, al. "Modeling landfill site selection by multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy functions in GIS, case study: Shabestar, Iran." Environmental Earth Sciences 75 (2016): 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kang, Yllah Okin, et al. "Optimal landfill site selection using arcgis multi-criteria decision-making (mcdm) and analytic hierarchy process (ahp) for kinshasa city." Environmental Challenges 14 (2024): 100826. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ismail, Elkhrachy, Alhamami, Ali, Alyami, Saleh, H., 2023. Landfill Site Selection, Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Remote Sensing Data, and Geographic Information System Tools in Najran City, Saudi Arabia. Remote Sens 15, 3754. [Google Scholar]
  12. Susnjar, S, Golijanin, J, Pecelj, M, Lukic Tanovic, M, Valjarevic, A, 2022. Environmental Suitability of the City of East Sarajevo for the Location of Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Site Using a GIS Based Multi-Criteria Analysis. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 31 (1), 857–870. [Google Scholar]
  13. Utility 01 (2023). Importance of GIS data design in land use planning and zoning. [Google Scholar]
  14. Demir, Gülay, Muhammad Riaz, and Muhammet Deveci. "Wind farm site selection using geographic information system and fuzzy decision making model." Expert systems with applications 255 (2024): 124772. [Google Scholar]
  15. Demir, G., Damjanovi´c, M., Matovi´c, B., & Vujadinovi´c, R. (2022). Toward sustainable urban mobility by using fuzzy-FUCOM and fuzzy-CoCoSo methods: The case of the SUMP podgorica. Sustainability., 14(9), 4972. [Google Scholar]
  16. Moslem, S. (2023). A novel parsimonious best worst method for evaluating travel mode choice. IEEE Access, 11, 16768–16773. [Google Scholar]
  17. Abbas, M., & Zhang, D. (2023). Revolutionizing low- carbon marine transportation: Prediction of wave energy via adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference framework in East China Sea. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 48, 15353–15375. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vahidinia, A., & Hasani, A. (2023). A comprehensive evaluation model for smart supply chain based on the hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics., 1(1), 219–237. [Google Scholar]
  19. Baker, M. R., Alamoodi, A., Albahri, O., Albahri, A., Garfan, S., Alamleh, A., Shuwandy, M. L., & Alshakhatreh, I. (2023). Comparison of machine learning approaches for detecting COVID-19- lockdown-related discussions during recovery and lockdown periods. Journal of Operations Intelligence, 1(1), 11–29. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rezazadeh, J., Bagheri, R., Karimi, S., Nazarian-Jashnabadi, J., & Zahedian Nezhad, M. (2023). Examining the impact of product innovation and pricing capability on the international performance of exporting companies with the mediating role of competitive advantage for analysis and decision making. Journal of Operations Intelligence, 1(1), 30–43. [Google Scholar]
  21. Demir, G. (2023). Evaluation of sustainable green building indicators by fuzzy multicriteria decision making. In L. Sahoo, T. Senapati, & R. R. Yager (Eds.), Real Life Applications of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques in Fuzzy Domain. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing (vol 420). Singapore: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bird-Friendly Golf Courses | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Retrieved 10 May 2025. [Google Scholar]
  23. Benton County Comprehensive Plan update in February 2018. P5, P30 [Google Scholar]
  24. Anchor, QEA, LLC. "Benton County comprehensive plan update" 2018 [Google Scholar]
  25. Shapefiles—ArcGIS Online Help | Documentation. Retrieved 11 May 2025. [Google Scholar]
  26. What is raster data?—ArcMap | Documentation. Retrieved 11 May 2025. [Google Scholar]
  27. Washington State Visitor’s Guide 2018. P111, P112 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.