Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 657, 2025
2nd International Conference on Sustainability and Technology in Climate Change (2nd IC-STCC 2025)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 10
Section Political Ecology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565703001
Published online 03 November 2025
  1. R. Ø. Nielsen, E. Sørensen, and J. Torfing, “Drivers of collaborative governance for the green transition,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 3715–3740, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2358321. [Google Scholar]
  2. Z. Konwar, Y. Wei, G. Wood, and J. E. Cheah, “The public as a definitive stakeholder of corporate environmental sustainability practices : A cross-national institutional approach,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 370, no. August, p. 122666, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122666. [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Wickert and A. Van Witteloostuijn, “Taking the P in political corporate social responsibility seriously,” J. Int. Bus. Stud., vol. 54, no. 00, pp. 928–937, 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41267-022-00572-0. [Google Scholar]
  4. R. W. Carney, S. El Ghoul, O. Guedhami, J. W. Lu, and H. Wang, “Political corporate social responsibility : The role of deliberative capacity,” J. Int. Bus. Stud., vol. 53, no. July, pp. 17661784, 2022, doi: 10.1057/s41267-022-00533-7. [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Sulemana, L. Cheng, O. A. Agyemang, A. Osei, and M. T. Nagriwum, “Stakeholders and sustainability disclosure: Evidence from an emerging market,” Sustain. Futur., vol. 9, no. November 2024, p. 100445, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100445. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Scheidel et al., “Global impacts of extractive and industrial development projects on Indigenous Peoples ’ lifeways, lands, and rights,” Sci. Adv., vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 33–35, 2023, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade9557. [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Al-esia, A. Crane, and K. Iatridis, “Political CSR and Populism: Toward an Theory of Political CSR,” Bus. Soc., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 373–408, 2024, doi: 10.1177/00076503231168078. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Field, DISCOVERING STATISTICS USING SPSS, Thousand Oaks, California 91320 SAGE: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Buckley, “Conducting Power Analyses to Determine Sample Sizes in Quantitative Research: A Primer for Technology Education Researchers Using Common Statistical Tests,” chnology Education Researchers Using Common Statistical Tests,” J. Technol. Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 81–109, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. F. J. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Third edit. United States of America Library: Los Angeles : SAGE, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Fifth Edit. United States of America: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2018. [Google Scholar]
  12. U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research Methods for Business, Fifth Edit. United Kingdom: Wiley John and Sons Ltd, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  13. B. G. Tabachnick and L. S. Fidell, Using Multivariate Statistics, SIXTH EDIT. California State University: Pearason, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. G. Scherer, A. Rasche, G. Palazzo, and A. Spicer, “Managing for Political Corporate Social Responsibility : New Challenges and Directions for PCSR 2.0,” J. Manag. Stud., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 273–298, 2016, doi: 10.1111/joms.12203. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. N. Gujarati and D. C. Porter, Econometría, Quinta edi. Mexico: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Inc, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Brammer, A. Millington, and B. Rayton, “The Contribution of Corporate Social Responsibility to Organisational Commitment,” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1701–1719, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. M. Bryson, B. C. Crosby, and L. Bloomberg, “Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 445–456, 2019, doi: 10.1111/puar.12238. [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Ansell and A. Gash, “Collaborative governance in theory and practice,” “Collaborative governance in theory and practice,” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 543–571, 2007, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032. [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Emerson and T. Nabatchi, “Public Performance & Management Review Evaluating the Productivity of Collaborative Governance Regimes : A Performance Matrix,” ty of Collaborative Governance Regimes : A Performance Matrix,” Public Perform. Manag. Rev., vol. 38, no. June 2015, pp. 717–747, 2015, doi: 10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. C. Suchman, “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic And Institutional Approaches,” vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 571–610, 1995. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.