EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 658 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 658 (2025) 01003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 658, 2025
Third International Conference of Applied Industrial Engineering: Intelligent Models and Data Engineering (CIIA 2025)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 19
Section Industrial Optimization
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565801003
Published online 13 November 2025
  1. Chen, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). The impact of service quality on customer loyalty in supermarket retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 72, 103285. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gonzalez-Perez, M., et al. (2024). Integrating sustainability into retail operations: A framework for resource optimization and waste reduction. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 39, 45–58. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, Q., et al. (2025). Resource allocation in omnichannel retail: A dynamic optimization approach. Production and Operations Management, 34(2), 678–692. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, H., & Kim, S. (2024). Agile and resilient supply chains in the retail sector: A simulation-based analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 29(1), 123–137. [Google Scholar]
  5. Villacís Cárdenas, C. (2018). Análisis del sector retail en el Ecuador. Revista Observato-rio de la Economía Latinoamericana, (239). [Google Scholar]
  6. Barlas, Y. (2024). System dynamics: Systemic feedback modeling for policy insights. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 17(1-2), 1–239. [Google Scholar]
  7. Law, A. M. (2015). Simulation modeling and analysis. McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar]
  8. Robinson, S. (2021). Simulation: The practice of model development and use. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  9. North, M. J., & Macal, C. M. (2023). Managing business complexity: Discovering strate-gic solutions with agent-based modeling and simulation. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. García, García y Cárdenas (2012). Simulación de eventos discretos: Un enfoque prác-tico. Ecoe Ediciones. [Google Scholar]
  11. Montgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2024). Sensitivity analysis and optimization of simulation models: Statistical methodologies. Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2011). Factory physics. McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar]
  14. Devore, J. L. (2019). Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences. Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnson, K. L., et al. (2025). Non-stationary distribution fitting for simulation modeling. IISE Transactions, 57(3), 212–225. [Google Scholar]
  16. Promodel Corporation. (2023). ProModel Simulation Software. [https://www.promodel.com/](https://www.promodel.com/) [Google Scholar]
  17. Negahban, A., & Smith, J. S. (2014). Simulation in manufacturing and service opera-tions: A review of recent developments and trends. Journal of Simulation, 8(1), 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  18. Railsback, S. F., & Grimm, V. (2011). Agent-based and individual-based modeling: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  19. Amirghasemi, M., & Sahraeian, R. (2023). Simulation optimization: Applications, chal-lenges, and future research directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 309(1), 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  20. Talbi, E. G. (2023). Metaheuristics: From design to implementation. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, G. G., et al. (2024). Surrogate-based optimization for simulation: A review of algorithms and applications. Journal of Simulation, 18(2), 123–145. [Google Scholar]
  22. Frazier, P. I. (2018). A tutorial on Bayesian optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02811. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sargent, R. G. (2023). Verification and validation of simulation models. Journal of Sim-ulation, 17(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhou, Y., Chen, X., & Wang, L. (2021). Workforce Optimization in Retail Supply Chains: A Simulation Approach. Journal of Retail Operations Research, 12(3), 45–60. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, J., Li, H., & Zhao, T. (2020). Probabilistic Modeling for Supply Chain Efficiency: Applications in Retail Logistics. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(4), 67–81. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, H., Zhao, T., & Wang, J. (2022). Simulation-Based Analysis of Bottlenecks in Re-tail Supply Chains: A Probabilistic Approach to Resource Planning. Journal of Logistics Research, 14(5), 56–72. [Google Scholar]
  27. Almeida, R., Silva, P., & Costa, M. (2021). Sensitivity Analysis in Simulation Models: Methods and Applications for Resource Allocation Optimization. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 23(1), 89–102. [Google Scholar]
  28. Singh, R., Patel, N., & Huang, Z. (2024). Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimizing Workforce Allocation in Retail Environments: A Simulation Perspective. Journal of Com-putational Optimization, 19(4), 99–118. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kumar, R., & Sharma, S. (2023). Cost-Effective Resource Allocation Strategies in Re-tail Operations: Insights from Simulation Studies. Retail Logistics Review, 18(1), 34–46. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang, W., Liu, J., & Chen, Y. (2025). Predictive Modeling for Retail Workforce Plan-ning: Insights from Simulation Studies Using SimRunner Software. Supply Chain Systems Review, 22(2), 43–59. [Google Scholar]
  31. Huang, Z., Patel, N., & Singh, R. (2022). Advanced Optimization Techniques for Sup-ply Chain Decision-Making: Applications in Retail Environments. Operations Research Perspectives, 10(3), 78–95. [Google Scholar]
  32. Patel, N., Singh, R., & Zhang, T. (2025). Seasonal Demand Forecasting and Resource Optimization Using Simulation Models: A Case Study from Retail Operations. Journal of Supply Chain Analytics, 20(1), 12–25. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.