EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 664 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 664 (2025) 01006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 664, 2025
4th International Seminar of Science and Applied Technology: “Green Technology and AI-Driven Innovations in Sustainability Development and Environmental Conservation” (ISSAT 2025)
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 8
Section Artificial Intelligence and Human-Computer Interaction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566401006
Published online 20 November 2025
  1. IBM Security, Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023, (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  2. Verizon, 2023 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR), (Verizon, Basking Ridge, NJ, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Thakkar, R. Lohiya, A Review of the Deep Learning and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 29, 2379–2403 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09641-x [Google Scholar]
  4. S. H. H. Madni, M. S. A. Latiff, S. M. M. S. H. Coulibaly, Y., A survey on threats, attacks and counter-measures on DNS. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. 14, 906 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Khraisat, I. Gondal, P. Vamplew, J. Kamruzzaman, A. Alazab, A survey of intrusion detection systems: techniques, datasets and challenges. Cybersecurity 2, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-019-0038-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Sharafaldin, A.H. Lashkari, A.A. Ghorbani, Toward generating a new intrusion detection dataset and intrusion traffic characterization. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP), pp. 108-116 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5220/0006639801080116 [Google Scholar]
  7. A.S. Sikeridis, E.P. Karyda, L.G. Papageorgiou, A semi-supervised approach for network intrusion detection. Inf. Sci. 546, 392-407 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.067 [Google Scholar]
  8. J.E. Van Engelen, H.H. Hoos, A survey on semi-supervised learning. Machine Learning 109, 373–440 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6 [Google Scholar]
  9. M. A. Ambusaidi, X. He, P. Nanda, Z. Tan, Building an intrusion detection system using a filter-based feature selection algorithm. IEEE Trans. Comput. 65, 2986-2998 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2016.2549132 [Google Scholar]
  10. N.V. Chawla, K.W. Bowyer, L.O. Hall, W.P. Kegelmeyer, SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321-357 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. N.V. Kovács, A. Kertész, The forgotten problem of high-dimensional imbalanced data sets. Inf. Sci. 611, 456-479 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.08.069 [Google Scholar]
  12. I. Goodfellow, J. Shlens, C. Szegedy, Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6572 (2014). https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572 [Google Scholar]
  13. D. B. Rawat, C. C. Sankey, C. A. Kamhoua, K. K. R. Bentum, K. P. Dahal, Characterizing Adversarial Attacks Against Deep Learning Models for Network Intrusion detection. IEEE Access 9, 34555-34567 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3061690 [Google Scholar]
  14. S. M. Kasongo, Y. Sun, A deep learning method with filter-based feature engineering for wireless intrusion detection system. IEEE Access 8, 38561-38576 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2975635 [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Xin, L. Kong, Z. Liu, Y. Chen, Y. Li, H. Zhu, M. Zhang, A. V. Vasilakos, Machine learning and deep learning methods for cybersecurity. IEEE Access 6, 35365-35381 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2836950 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Fitriani, S. Mandala, M. A. Murti, Review of semi-supervised method for intrusion detection system. 2016 Asia Pacific Conference on Multimedia and Broadcasting, (2016). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.