Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 668, 2025
2025 International Conference on Structural and Civil Engineering (ICSCE 2025)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Behavior of Geomaterials and Soil-Structure Systems under Complex Environmental Conditions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566801003
Published online 27 November 2025
  1. Sarsby RW, editor. Geosynthetics in civil engineering. 1. publ. Cambridge: Woodhead; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Naga L, Chikhaoui M, Cazzuffi D, Djerbal L. Effect of installation damage on the behavior of a polypropylene geogrid in an aggressive environment. Transportation Geotechnics 2025;51:101523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101523. [Google Scholar]
  3. Leshchinsky B, Berg R, Liew W, Kawakami-Selin M, Moore J, Brown S, et al. Characterization of geogrid mechanical and chemical properties from a thirty-six year old mechanically-stabilized earth wall. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2020;48:793–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.06.002. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hsuan YG, Schroeder HF, Rowe K, Müller W, Greenwood J, Cazzuffi D, et al. Long-term Performance and Lifetime Prediction of Geosynthetics 2008. [Google Scholar]
  5. Maier C, Calafut T. Polypropylene: the definitive user’s guide and databook. Norwich, NY: Plastics Design Library; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hocker S, Rhudy AK, Ginsburg G, Kranbuehl DE. Polyamide hydrolysis accelerated by small weak organic acids. Polymer 2014;55:5057–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.08.010. [Google Scholar]
  7. Woodard LN, Grunlan MA. Hydrolytic Degradation and Erosion of Polyester Biomaterials. ACS Macro Lett 2018;7:976–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00424. [Google Scholar]
  8. Suljovrujic E, Stojanovic Z, Dudic D, Milicevic D. Radiation, thermo-oxidative and storage induced changes in microstructure, crystallinity and dielectric properties of (un)oriented isotactic polypropylene. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2021;188:109564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.109564. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cazzuffi D, Mongiovi L, Torresendi M. Laboratory and field tests for the evaluation of installation damage of geosynthetics in reinforced earth structures 2001. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pinho-Lopes M, Lopes MDL. Soil-geosynthetic interaction in inclined-plane shear and geosynthetic short-term tensile response – Influence of installation damage. Construction and Building Materials 2021;274:122018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122018. [Google Scholar]
  11. Naga L, Chikhaoui M, Djerbal L. Assessment of chemical resistance of polyester and polypropylene geosynthetics in an aggressive environment. Proceeding of the 18th African Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Algeria: 2024. [Google Scholar]
  12. Naga L, Chikhaoui M, Djerbal L. INVESTIGATING THE CHEMICAL STABILITY OF POLYOLEFIN AND POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE GEOSYNTHETICS IN APPLICATIONS FOR ACIDIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT. 7th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING ISTANBUL 2024 (ICAME 2024), Istanbul: 2024. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sardehaei EA, Mehrjardi GT, Dawson A. Full-scale investigations into installation damage of nonwoven geotextiles. Geomechanics and Engineering 2019;17:81–95. https://doi.org/10.12989/GAE.2019.17.1.081. [Google Scholar]
  14. ASTM D6637. Test Method for Determining Tensile Properties of Geogrids by the Single or Multi-Rib Tensile Method 2023. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6637_D6637M-15. [Google Scholar]
  15. Broughton WR, Maxwell AS. Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 103 2007. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pinho-Lopes M, Paula AM, Lopes ML. Soil–geosynthetic interaction in pullout and inclined-plane shear for two geosynthetics exhumed after installation damage. Geosynthetics International 2016;23:331–47. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.16.00001. [Google Scholar]
  17. Baltes L, Costiuc L, Patachia S, Tierean M. Differential scanning calorimetry—a powerful tool for the determination of morphological features of the recycled polypropylene. J Therm Anal Calorim 2019;138:2399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08679-7. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tyler DR. Mechanistic Aspects of the Effects of Stress on the Rates of Photochemical Degradation Reactions in Polymers. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part C: Polymer Reviews 2004;44:351–88. https://doi.org/10.1081/MC-200033682. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lv Y, Huang Y, Kong M, Li G. Improved thermal oxidation stability of polypropylene films in the presence of β-nucleating agent. Polymer Testing 2013;32:179–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.10.008. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ketsamee P, Vryonis O, Vaughan A, Andritsch T. Thermo-Oxidative Aging Effect on Charge Transport in Polypropylene/Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Nanocomposites. Energies 2023;16:6670. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186670. [Google Scholar]
  21. Perthué A, Bussière P-O, Baba M, Larche J-F, Gardette J-L, Therias S. Correlation between water uptake and loss of the insulating properties of PE/ATH composites used in cables applications. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2016;127:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.01.020. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wu H, Zhao Y, Dong X, Su L, Wang K, Wang D. Probing into the microstructural evolution of isotactic polypropylene during photo-oxidation degradation. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2021;183:109434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109434. [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Krevelen DW, Te Nijenhuis K. Chemical Degradation. Properties of Polymers, Elsevier; 2009, p. 779–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-054819-7.00022-4. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.