Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 669, 2025
6th International Conference on Environmental Design and Health (ICED2025)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Climate Change
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566903004
Published online 26 November 2025
  1. M. Somireddy, A. Czekanski, C. Singh, Development of constitutive material model of 3D printed structure via FDM. Mater. Today Commun. 15, 143 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  2. A.H. Alami, A. Ghani Olabi, A. Alashkar, S. Alasad, H. Aljaghoub, H. Rezk, M.A. Abdelkareem, Additive manufacturing in the aerospace and automotive industries: Recent trends and role in achieving sustainable development goals. Ain Shams Eng. J., 14, 102516 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102516 [Google Scholar]
  3. J. A. Scott, N. Gupta, C. Weber, S. Newsome, Additive Manufacturing: Status and Opportunities. Sci. Technol. Policy Inst. (2112). [Google Scholar]
  4. O. Bouzaglou, O. Golan, N. Lachman, Process Design and Parameters Interaction in Material Extrusion 3D Printing: A Review. Polymers, 15, 2280 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102280 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Garg, K. Tai, M.-M. Savalani, M.M., State-of- the-art in empirical modelling of rapid prototyping processes, Rapid Prototyp. J., 20, 164 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2012-0072 [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Serra, J.-A. Planell, M. Navarro, High-Resolution PLA-Based Composite Scaffolds via 3-D Printing Technology. Acta Biomater., 9, 5521 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.041 [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Ziemian, M. Sharma, S. Ziemian, Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling. In Mechanical Engineering. InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 159 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/34233 [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Melocchi, M. Uboldi, M. Cerea, A. Foppoli, A. Maroni, S. Moutaharrik, L. Palugan, L. Zema, A. Gazzaniga, A Graphical Review on the Escalation of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D Printing in the Pharmaceutical Field. J. Pharm. Sci. 109, 2943 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2020.07.011 [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Chatzidai, D. Karalekas, Experimental and numerical study on the influence of critical 3D printing processing parameters. Frat. and Struct. Integr. 13, 407 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.50.34 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Elbadawi, A.-W. Basit, S. Gaisford, Energy consumption and carbon footprint of 3D printing in pharmaceutical manufacture. Int. J. Pharm. 639, 122926 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122926 [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Grabowska, S. Saniuk, B. Gajdzik, Industry 5.0: improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.0. Scientometrics 127, 3117 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04370-1 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Tambouratzis, D. Karalekas, N. Moustakas, A Methodological Study for Optimizing Material Selection in Sustainable Product Design. J. Ind. Ecol. 18, 508 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12035 [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Jennings, M. Rao, Towards a carbon neutral NHS. BMJ 371, m3884 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3884 [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Garg, R. Rani, V.-K. Meena, S. Singh, Significance of 3D printing for a sustainable environment. Mater. Today Sustain. 23, 100419 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100419 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Kreiger, J. Pearce, Environmental Life Cycle Analysis of Distributed Three-Dimensional Printing and Conventional Manufacturing of Polymer Products. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 1, 1511 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/sc400093k [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.