Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 671, 2025
3rd International Symposium on Environmental and Energy Policy (ISEEP 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 05006 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Socio-Environmental Dimensions of Sustainability | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567105006 | |
| Published online | 01 December 2025 | |
- S. Farias-Gaytan, I. Aguaded, and M. S. Ramirez-Montoya, “Digital transformation and digital literacy in the context of complexity within higher education institutions: a systematic literature review,” Dec. 01, 2023, Springer Nature. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01875-9. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO, Education for sustainable development: a roadmap. UNESCO, 2020. doi: 10.54675/YFRE1448. [Google Scholar]
- L. A. T. Nguyen and A. Habók, “Digital literacy of English majors: subjective versus objective assessment,” J Comput High Educ, May 2025, doi: 10.1007/s12528-025-09448-2. [Google Scholar]
- J. Hackston, “MBTI ® type, attitudes to the environment, and sustainable organizations: A research report from The Myers-Briggs Company,” Feb. 2024. [Google Scholar]
- H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” J Bus Res, vol. 104, pp. 333–339, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Mazzoni and S. R. Sedita, “Unpacking the drivers of the socio-environmental sustainability of new ventures: insights from innovative digital start-ups in Italy,” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11365-024-01019-8. [Google Scholar]
- I. Gabelaia, T. Dolidze, and N. Vasadze, “The Relevance of Sustainable Education in Project-Based Learning Through Technology Integration in EFL Classroom,” I. Kabashkin, I. Yatskiv, and O. Prentkovskis, Eds., Spinger, 2025, pp. 507–517. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-87532-8_45. [Google Scholar]
- C. J. Lai and Y. F. Wang, “Transformative impact of pre-service CLIL science workshops on pedagogical content knowledge and language teaching competencies,” Humanit Soc Sci Commun, vol. 12, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-04917-6. [Google Scholar]
- J. E. Kjeldsen, “The study of visual and multimodal argumentation,” Argumentation, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 115–132, May 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10503-015-9348-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W. Wu, L. Chen, Q. Yang, and Y. Li, “Inferring Students’ Personality from Their Communication Behavior in Web-based Learning Systems,” Int J Artif Intell Educ, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 189–216, May 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40593-018-00173-9. [Google Scholar]
- S. McGrew and A. M. Kohnen, “Tackling misinformation through online information literacy: Structural and contextual considerations,” 2024, Routledge. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2023.2280385. [Google Scholar]
- R. Huang, M. A. Adarkwah, M. Liu, Y. Hu, R. Zhuang, and T. Chang, “Digital Pedagogy for Sustainable Education Transformation: Enhancing Learner-Centred Learning in the Digital Era,” Frontiers of Digital Education, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 279–294, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44366-024-0031-x. [Google Scholar]
- S. Mahapatra and S. Koltovskaia, “A framework for focalising critical digital literacies in second language teacher education in the Global South,” Dec. 01, 2025, Springer Science and Business Media B.V. doi: 10.1186/s40862-025-00350-z. [Google Scholar]
- M. Weller, “The Rise and Development of Digital Education,” in Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education, S. Bedenlier and T. Belawati, Eds., Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023, pp. 75–91. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_5. [Google Scholar]
- P. Garcés and R. O’Dowd, “Upscaling Virtual Exchange in University Education: Moving From Innovative Classroom Practice to Regional Governmental Policy,” J Stud Int Educ, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 283–300, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1177/1028315320932323. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.