EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 672 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 672 (2025) 02019 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 672, 2025
The 17th ROOMVENT Conference (ROOMVENT 2024)
Article Number 02019
Number of page(s) 8
Section Modelling & Measuring: Modelling & Measuring
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567202019
Published online 05 December 2025
  1. R. Atiyani, S. Mustafa, S. Alsari, A. Darwish, E.M. Janahi, Clearing the air about airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2., Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 25 (2021) 6745–6766. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202111_27120. [Google Scholar]
  2. Z.-W. Ye, S. Yuan, K.-S. Yuen, S.-Y. Fung, C.-P. Chan, D.-Y. Jin, Zoonotic origins of human coronaviruses., Int. J. Biol. Sci. 16 (2020) 1686–1697. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.45472. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Mirzaie, E. Lakzian, A. Khan, M.E. Warkiani, O. Mahian, G. Ahmadi, COVID-19 spread in a classroom equipped with partition – A CFD approach, J. Hazard. Mater. 420 (2021) 126587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126587. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Foster, M. Kinzel, Estimating COVID-19 exposure in a classroom setting: A comparison between mathematical and numerical models, Phys. Fluids. 33 (2021) 021904. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0040755. [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Motamedi, M. Shirzadi, Y. Tominaga, P.A. Mirzaei, CFD modeling of airborne pathogen transmission of COVID-19 in confined spaces under different ventilation strategies, Sustain. Cities Soc. 76 (2022) 103397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103397. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mariam, A. Magar, M. Joshi, P.S. Rajagopal, A. Khan, M.M. Rao, B.K. Sapra, CFD Simulation of the Airborne Transmission of COVID-19 Vectors Emitted during Respiratory Mechanisms: Revisiting the Concept of Safe Distance, ACS Omega. 6 (2021) 16876–16889. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c01489. [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Li, H. Qian, J. Hang, X. Chen, P. Cheng, H. Ling, S. Wang, P. Liang, J. Li, S. Xiao, J. Wei, L. Liu, B.J. Cowling, M. Kang, Probable airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a poorly ventilated restaurant, Build. Environ. 196 (2021) 107788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107788. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Ye, H. Qian, J. Ma, R. Zhou, X. Zheng, Using air curtains to reduce short-range infection risk in consulting ward: A numerical investigation, Build. Simul. 14 (2021) 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0649- 7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Suleiman, A. Elshaer, M. Billah, M. Bassuony, Propagation of Mouth-Generated Aerosols in a Modularly Constructed Hospital Room, Sustainability. 13 (2021) 11968. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111968. [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Fan, L. Liu, H. Zhang, Y. Deng, Y. Wang, M. Duan, H. Wang, L. Wang, L. Han, Y. Liu, Exposure of Ophthalmologists to Patients’ Exhaled Droplets in Clinical Practice: A Numerical Simulation of SARS-CoV-2 Exposure Risk, Front. Public Heal. 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.725648. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Komperda, A. Peyvan, D. Li, B. Kashir, A.L. Yarin, C.M. Megaridis, P. Mirbod, I. Paprotny, L.F. Cooper, S. Rowan, C. Stanford, F. Mashayek, Computer simulation of the SARS- CoV-2 contamination risk in a large dental clinic, Phys. Fluids. 33 (2021) 033328. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043934. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Liu, J. Liu, Q. Cao, X. Li, S. Liu, S. Ji, C.-H. Lin, D. Wei, X. Shen, Z. Long, Q. Chen, Evaluation of different air distribution systems in a commercial airliner cabin in terms of comfort and COVID-19 infection risk, Build. Environ. 208 (2022) 108590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108590. [Google Scholar]
  13. Q. Cao, M. Liu, X. Li, C.-H. Lin, D. Wei, S. Ji, T. (Tim) Zhang, Q. Chen, Influencing factors in the simulation of airflow and particle transportation in aircraft cabins by CFD, Build. Environ. 207 (2022) 108413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108413. [Google Scholar]
  14. Q. Luo, C. Ou, J. Hang, Z. Luo, H. Yang, X. Yang, X. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Fan, Role of pathogen-laden expiratory droplet dispersion and natural ventilation explaining a COVID-19 outbreak in a coach bus, Build. Environ. 220 (2022) 109160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109160. [Google Scholar]
  15. C.K. Ho, R. Binns, Modeling and mitigating airborne pathogen risk factors in school buses, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 129 (2021) 105663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105663. [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Miller, M. King, J. Nally, J.R. Drodge, G.I. Reeves, A.M. Bate, H. Cooper, U. Dalrymple, I. Hall, M. López‐García, S.T. Parker, C.J. Noakes, Modeling the factors that influence exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2 on a subway train carriage, Indoor Air. 32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12976. [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Li, K. Zhong, Z. (John) Zhai, Investigating the influences of ventilation on the fate of particles generated by patient and medical staff in operating room, Build. Environ. 180 (2020) 107038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107038. [Google Scholar]
  18. A.R. Sarhan, P. Naser, J. Naser, COVID-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study, J. Environ. Heal. Sci. Eng. 19 (2021) 1969–1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00748-0. [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Pei, M. Taylor, D. Rim, Human exposure to respiratory aerosols in a ventilated room: Effects of ventilation condition, emission mode, and social distancing, Sustain. Cities Soc. 73 (2021) 103090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103090. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Aganovic, Y. Bi, G. Cao, F. Drangsholt, J. Kurnitski, P. Wargocki, Estimating the impact of indoor relative humidity on SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission risk using a new modification of the Wells-Riley model, Build. Environ. 205 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108278. [Google Scholar]
  21. L. Schumann, J. Lange, Y.E. Cetin, M. Kriegel, Experimental analysis of airborne contaminant distribution in an operating room with different ventilation schemes, Build. Environ. 244 (2023) 110783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110783. [Google Scholar]
  22. B.E. Yuce, P.V. Nielsen, P. Wargocki, The use of Taguchi, ANOVA, and GRA methods to optimize CFD analyses of ventilation performance in buildings, Build. Environ. 225 (2022) 109587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109587. [Google Scholar]
  23. B.E. Yuce, A. Aganovic, P.V. Nielsen, P. Wargocki, Analysis of parameters influencing pathogen concentration in a room with displacement ventilation using computational fluid dynamics and Taguchi methods, J. Build. Eng. 80 (2023) 108002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108002. [Google Scholar]
  24. P. V. Nielsen, Specification of a Two- Dimensional Test Case: (IEA), Inst. Bygningsteknik, Aalborg Univ. R9040 (1990). https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/specification-of-a-two-dimensional-test-case-iea. [Google Scholar]
  25. W.H. Yang, Y.S. Tarng, Design optimization of cutting parameters for turning operations based on the Taguchi method, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 84 (1998) 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00079-X. [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Niu, M. Shi, Z. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Cao, S. Pan, Multi-objective optimization of supply air jet enhancing airflow uniformity in data center with Taguchi-based grey relational analysis, Build. Environ. 208 (2022) 108606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108606. [Google Scholar]
  27. B.E. YÜCE, Application of the Taguchi and ANOVA Methods to Optimize Ventilation Parameters for Infection Risk Based on the Wells-Riley Model, Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilim. Derg. 12 (2023) 199–206. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1222870. [Google Scholar]
  28. N. Arslanoglu, A. Yigit, Investigation of efficient parameters on optimum insulation thickness based on theoretical-Taguchi combined method, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy. 36 (2017) 1824–1831. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12628. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.