EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 672 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 672 (2025) 03029 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 672, 2025
The 17th ROOMVENT Conference (ROOMVENT 2024)
Article Number 03029
Number of page(s) 8
Section Ventilation & Energy Efficiency: Heat Exchangers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567203029
Published online 05 December 2025
  1. R. F. Al-Waked, M. S. Nasif. Air to Air Energy Recovery from HVAC Systems under Different Membrane Materials. Universal Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2, 37–49 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Min, M. Su. Performance analysis of a membrane-based enthalpy exchanger: Effects of the membrane properties on the exchanger performance. Journal of Membrane Science. 348, 376–382 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Shakir Nasif. Effect of utilizing different permeable material in air-to-air fixed plate energy recovery heat exchangeron energy saving. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 21, 10153–10158 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  4. J. L. Niu, L. Z. Zhang. Membrane-based Enthalpy Exchanger: material considerations and clarification of moisture resistance. Journal of Membrane Science. 189, 179–191 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. K. Albdoor, Z. Ma, P. Cooper. Experimental investigation and performance evaluation of a mixed-flow air to air membrane enthalpy exchanger with different configurations. Applied Thermal Engineering, 114682 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Engarnevis, S. Romani, A. Sylvester, R. Huizing, S. Green, S. Rogak. The effects of temperature and humidity on the permeation properties of membrane transport media used in energy recovery ventilators (2017). [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Min, M. Su. Performance analysis of a membrane-based energy recovery ventilator: Effects of outdoor air state. Applied Thermal Engineering. 31, 4036–4043 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Shakir Nasif, R. Al-Waked. Seasonal Weather Conditions Effect on Energy Consumption and CO2 Emission for Air Conditioning Systems Coupled with Enthalpy Energy Recovery Heat Exchanger. APCBEE Procedia, 42–48 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Siegele, F. Ochs. Effectiveness of a membrane enthalpy heat exchanger. Applied Thermal Engineering, 114005 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  10. A. K. Albdoor, Z. Ma, F. Al-Ghazzawi, J. Liu, M. B. Awan. Experimental and numerical investigation of the operating performance of air- to-air membrane enthalpy exchangers. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 101722 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Sotokawa, J. Chung, S.-J. Yoo, K. Ito. Numerical sensitivity analyses for identifying rate- limiting factors influencing total energy exchange efficiency in energy recovery ventilator. Indoor and Built Environment. 2, 245–263 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Zhi Zhang. Progress on heat and moisture recovery with membranes: From fundamentals to engineering applications. Energy Conversion and Management. 63, 173–195 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Li, Q. Zhang, Y. Li. Application of an Air-Air Energy Exchanger in a Building HVAC System in Xiamen. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2474– 2477 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Liu, W. Li, J. Liu, B. Wang. Efficiency of energy recovery ventilator with various weathers and its energy saving performance in a residential apartment. Energy and Buildings. 42, 43–49 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Liu, M. Justo Alonso, H. Martin Mathisen, C. Simonson. Energy transfer and energy saving potentials of air-to-air membrane energy exchanger for ventilation in cold climates. Energy and Buildings. 135, 95–108 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Z. Zhang, J. L. Niu. Energy requirements for conditioning fresh air and the longterm savings with a membrane-based energy recovery ventilator in Hong Kong. Energy. 26, 119–135 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Fauchoux. The effect of energy recovery on indoor climate, air quality and energy consumption using computer simulations (2006). [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Rasouli, C. J. Simonson, R. W. Besant. Applicability and optimum control strategy of energy recovery ventilators in different climatic conditions. Energy and Buildings. 9, 1376–1385 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Zhi Zhang. Conjugate Heat and Mass Transfer in Heat Mass Exchanger Ducts (2014). [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Maier, D. Jansen, F. Wüllhorst, M. Kremer, A. Kümpel, T. Blacha, D. Müller. AixLib: an open- source Modelica library for compound building energy systems from component to district level with automated quality management. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 1–24 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Kremer, P. Mathis, D. Müller. Moisture Recovery – A Dynamic Modelling Approach. E3S Web of Conferences, 1099 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  22. Energetische Bewertung von Gebäuden - Lüftung von Gebäuden - Teil 1: Eingangsparameter für das Innenraumklima zur Auslegung und Bewertung der Energieeffizienz von Gebäuden bezüglich Raumluftqualität, Temperatur, Licht und Akustik. DIN EN 16798 - 1. [Google Scholar]
  23. E. M. Sterling, A. Arundel, T. D. Sterling. Criteria for human exposure to humidity in occupied buildings. ASHRAE Trans. 1, 611–622 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Lauster, A. Constantin. Verification of a Low Order Building Model for the Modelica Library AixLib using ASHRAE Standard 140, in Proceedings of Building Simulation 2017: 15th Conference of IBPSA (2017). [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Remmen, M. Lauster, M. Mans, M. Fuchs, T. Osterhage, D. Müller. TEASER: an open tool for urban energy modelling of building stocks. Journal of Building Performance Simulation. 1, 84–98 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  26. Raumnutzungsdaten für Energie- und Gebäudetechnik. SIA 2024. [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Kremer, P. Mathis, D. Müller. Moisture in thermal zones – a dynamic modelling approach. 1st International Conference on Moisture in Buildings 2021, ICMB21 (2021). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.